Ontario Highway Traffic Act

#1 This link to the manual is for the US manual and should not be relied upon for use in Canada. They are quite different.
#2 The Genesis II SD can not display the speed of more than one target at a time. They can track and indicate whether the vehicle is travelling towards or away from the police vehicle from both front and rear antennaa(if ...

Laying a charge in an MVC and being "at fault" are often two different things. Regulation 668 of the Insurance Act sets out At Fault Rules for Insurance companies. In this case, i believe the other driver would be 100% at fault. They could also be charged with the unsafe lane change HTA section 142(1). Determining your speed in this situation would ...

No.
Google Ontario photo ID card and you will find a link to the MTO for this card. Same size as a Licence but is a purple colour. They may not issue you one though because it says it's for persons who do not hold a drivers licence. Technically you still do but it's suspended. Cant hurt to phone and ask though.

Ontario Highway Traffic Act
Abandoned or unplated vehicles

221. (1) A police officer or an officer appointed for carrying out the provisions of this Act who discovers a vehicle apparently abandoned on or near a highway or a motor vehicle or trailer without proper number plates may take the vehicle into the custody of the law and may cause it to be ...

Mayday might want to edit the last sentence of the above post as it certainly doesn't offer any assistance to the original post.

Like I said, I've never seen or heard of a new province wide regualtion that would prohibit officers from setting up radar at the top of or bottom of a hill.
I don't believe it exists. A speed limit is a speed limit, regarless of whether there is a hill or not.

I know of no such provincial regulation that would prohibit the use of radar in these locations. Could it just be a local agency policy?

Last I checked, Mississauga isn't covered by Metropolitan Toronto Bylaws. You may have to check for something similar in Peel Region.

As far as I know there is no standard for the codes used in this box. It's left up to each agency. the only one I've ever used is an R to indicate that a speeding ticket has already been reduced at roadside.

In my experience, all of my evidence for a Part I is written on the back of the ticket and very little is in the notebook. The only thing in my notebook is simply a quick repeat of the very basic information found on the front of the ticket.

Simon is correct. The internal tests take about 20 seconds and the only other test to do is to make sure the patrol speed indicated on the radar co-relates to the patrol vehicles speed. If the antenna on the radar is straight, then the speeds will co-relate easily. Just a thought. By any chance doe s the manual you have say "This manual not ...

Give us the actual charge wording, section number, set fine and total payable and I'm sure we can give you a more accurate answer.

Either that or report the collision to your insurance company. So you're either going to pay for it up front or possibly with an insurance rate hike. Regardless of whether you were charged as a result of the collision or not, the insurance company will find you 100% at fault.

Actually there is a set of rules to follow for a Suspect Apprehension Pursuit. Instead of spewing them all out, here's the link to the Reg.
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/e ... 0266_e.htm

A quick note about any "manual" you may find on the internet. Chances are: 1) It may be out of date and 2) The Canadian manual is very different than the U.S version. I certainly wouldn't rely on its accuracy for court purposes.