So this is my first ticket and I got this in September 2013 for failing to stop at the stop sign. I believe that I did stop, however the officer proceeded to hand me the ticket. I decided to go to trial and received notice of trial in a couple of days. Now my court date in tomorrow and I'm freaking out. I have never done this and I am unsure on how to go on about this. I am hoping the officer does not show up. But if they do, can I still plead guilty, although I did decide to go to trial by pleading not guilty. If the officer, does show up, I know it's going to be their word against mine. Do I/Can I still plead guilty and ask them to omit 3 demerit points by explaining them that I am a university student and would not be able to afford any hikes in my insurance? Any suggestion? Tips? Freaking out, this is my first time...thank you
So this is my first ticket and I got this in September 2013 for failing to stop at the stop sign. I believe that I did stop, however the officer proceeded to hand me the ticket. I decided to go to trial and received notice of trial in a couple of days. Now my court date in tomorrow and I'm freaking out. I have never done this and I am unsure on how to go on about this.
I am hoping the officer does not show up. But if they do, can I still plead guilty, although I did decide to go to trial by pleading not guilty. If the officer, does show up, I know it's going to be their word against mine. Do I/Can I still plead guilty and ask them to omit 3 demerit points by explaining them that I am a university student and would not be able to afford any hikes in my insurance?
Any suggestion? Tips? Freaking out, this is my first time...thank you
At the start of your trial youll be asked how you want to plea. If you no longer want to have a trial, you can simply enter a plea of guilty. During sentencing, you can explain your financial situation and the Justice of the Peace may reduce your fine. They cannot however reduce the demerit points. Once youre convicted of an offence, theyre automatically applied by the MTO.
At the start of your trial youll be asked how you want to plea. If you no longer want to have a trial, you can simply enter a plea of guilty. During sentencing, you can explain your financial situation and the Justice of the Peace may reduce your fine. They cannot however reduce the demerit points. Once youre convicted of an offence, theyre automatically applied by the MTO.
Yes, you can still plead guilty. They may or may not offer you a reduced charge. They'll do so in return for a guilty plea and avoiding a time consuming trial. They cannot make points disappear. Points are automatically attributed to the charge and not assessed on a person to person basis. If your charge is reduced, the amount of points may change based on the charge being offered. You cannot plead guilty to a charge that has points and simply have the points reduced. They are applied automatically by the MTO according to the charge. If you leave your trial with any points, they will expire September 2015. They start from the date you were charged and last 2 years. Insurance companies don't care about points. They don't use them and they don't look at them. Either you are convicted or you weren't. If you could have the points removed from your charge, which you can't, it wouldn't matter to your insurance anyways. Points are a penalty system used by the MTO to punish repeat offenders. It doesn't matter to your insurance company. Being charged may change your rates whether there's points or not. You could be charged with zero points and still have your rates go up. They'll decide your rates based on the charge and your current driving record. Points are not a factor unless you rack up enough to get suspended.
jonathanfront18 wrote:
Can I still plead guilty and ask them to omit 3 demerit points by explaining them that I am a university student and would not be able to afford any hikes in my insurance?
Yes, you can still plead guilty. They may or may not offer you a reduced charge. They'll do so in return for a guilty plea and avoiding a time consuming trial.
They cannot make points disappear. Points are automatically attributed to the charge and not assessed on a person to person basis. If your charge is reduced, the amount of points may change based on the charge being offered. You cannot plead guilty to a charge that has points and simply have the points reduced. They are applied automatically by the MTO according to the charge. If you leave your trial with any points, they will expire September 2015. They start from the date you were charged and last 2 years.
Insurance companies don't care about points. They don't use them and they don't look at them. Either you are convicted or you weren't. If you could have the points removed from your charge, which you can't, it wouldn't matter to your insurance anyways. Points are a penalty system used by the MTO to punish repeat offenders. It doesn't matter to your insurance company. Being charged may change your rates whether there's points or not. You could be charged with zero points and still have your rates go up. They'll decide your rates based on the charge and your current driving record. Points are not a factor unless you rack up enough to get suspended.
In fail to stop cases where the officer is the only witness, then if the officer doesn't attend court, the charge is generally dismissed since the prosecution has no evidence to call. If the officer's nonattendance is unexpected (i.e. officer's ill, family death or has a personal emergency) then an adjournment is usually granted. However, if their nonattendance is due to shift conflicts or because they are out on another police matter, then an adjournment is rarely granted by the court and the prosecutor will simply dismiss.
In fail to stop cases where the officer is the only witness, then if the officer doesn't attend court, the charge is generally dismissed since the prosecution has no evidence to call. If the officer's nonattendance is unexpected (i.e. officer's ill, family death or has a personal emergency) then an adjournment is usually granted. However, if their nonattendance is due to shift conflicts or because they are out on another police matter, then an adjournment is rarely granted by the court and the prosecutor will simply dismiss.
I hope I can paint the picture with the accuracy that the truth deserves. I have no intention of just beating a ticket.. but more like beating a really unfair ticket. You decide!
I had entered Canada after a short trip downsouth through Detroit on my way to Toronto. Not being equipped with a GPS…
In June at 401 London and Wellington I got hit twice, speeding which I didn't realize I was doing and cell phone. The Officer made me open my purse and show him my phone. I was going to meet a Rep of my Company in Kitchener, he called I answered. WRONG! The Officer wasn't even nice. My record…
I'm going to preface this with a little concern....I know that at least one moderator on this forum is likely a co-worker of the officer who tagged me. I'm hoping that by being involved here, this moderator is already acting unbiased towards incidents he/she is not directly involved in. Also…
I received a ticket the other day that has my wrong name, wrong address and wrong set fine amount. Is the best thing to do default on it and hope it is quashed and if it isn't file for appeal as per London v. Young ?
Also for an incorrect offence or an offence "not known to law." as an example :
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could…
I got a ticket for going 20 km/h over 50 in Toronto around March of last year and received my court summons for a hearing in February 2012 approx. 3 weeks ago. Mailed out a request for disclosure a week after that. It's now been 2 and a 1/2 weeks since the request and I was…