Folks, My alleged offence is rather simple - speeding 134km/h in a 100km/h zone (quoted from the ticket). After reading all the vast troves of info here. I still have 2 pressing questions, in advance of my upcoming trial (where I may ask for an adjournment, to prepare my defence, as unexpectedly, I've received partial disclosure, a couple of weeks prior to the trial): 1. The ticket states "Highway Traffic Act" in the "contrary to" section - doesn't it have to list a specific subsection of the HTA to be valid? If I'm correct, then its invalid? 2. In the notes, the officer is claiming to have pulled over a different colour and make vehicle, than what I was driving. Only the model and license plate are correct. Am I correct in believing that this could be used to establish a lack of credibility, i.e. if you can't tell one make and colour from another, then how do you know it was me you wanted to pull over? All thoughts are highly appreciated.