Hi everyone, I was hoping you could help me out with some information and advice. I was in an accident and received a summons for Careless Driving. I would like some input, below is what happened. I was driving South Bound on a 2 lane road, with a median on the left, approaching an intersection that is not a street, but an off ramp from a highway. To the right is the traffic that would be exiting from the highway, and to the left there is no road. Our light was green, and had been green since I could see the light. I am car number 4 driving along at the limit (not above). All of a sudden, I heard lots of honking in front of me and other cars started braking and then swerving out of our lane to the right lane. I started braking right away when I saw and heard the honking. Car number 1 had decided to do a u-turn in that intersection, so the two cars in front of me were able to see this, and braked/honked, and swerved to the right. Once they did this, then I saw Car 1, now coming to a full stop in the middle of the intersection with his left turn signal on. As I mentioned, I already had started braking when I saw the commotion and braking of the cars in front of me, but it was too close, and raining and slippery, and I still rear-end the other driver's car. He then did the U-turn and stopped on the side of the road facing north bound, the light was still green at that point, so I followed him and stopped behind him. Police showed up later and talked to both of us, although I didn't hear much of what the other driver said. I am not sure if he was given a ticket or summons as well. I want to know what I should expect. The summons letter does not mention very much in terms of options, or ability to request disclosure. What will happen at the summons? I have read around this site a lot, and it seems like Careless Driving is very serious, but also a hard charge to prove, and I feel that I was in fact, paying attention to the traffic and driving carefully. I braked as soon as I saw others braking, but can't see 4 cars in front of me. I was not following too closely, but once a car in front of you swerves out of your lane to reveal a stopped object, there is not much time for anything. I slammed the brakes, but knew I did not have time to check my blind spot for swerving into the right lane, which would have been careless for not only me, but a potential other driver. Also my 2 month old was in the car seat in the back right, so I was not going to blindly change lanes. I also could not avoid the collision to the left because of the median. After telling the insurance company what happened, they called and said that I was not at fault, and that the other insurance company has accepted liability, and that I didn't need to pay anything. Will this also help my case? Any insight to this would be great, as I want to know, 1) what will happen 2) chances of it getting dropped 3) chances of lesser charge (still not desirable though) Thank you all so much for your help, and this great site that has tons of information on it.
Hi everyone, I was hoping you could help me out with some information and advice. I was in an accident and received a summons for Careless Driving. I would like some input, below is what happened.
I was driving South Bound on a 2 lane road, with a median on the left, approaching an intersection that is not a street, but an off ramp from a highway. To the right is the traffic that would be exiting from the highway, and to the left there is no road. Our light was green, and had been green since I could see the light. I am car number 4 driving along at the limit (not above). All of a sudden, I heard lots of honking in front of me and other cars started braking and then swerving out of our lane to the right lane. I started braking right away when I saw and heard the honking. Car number 1 had decided to do a u-turn in that intersection, so the two cars in front of me were able to see this, and braked/honked, and swerved to the right. Once they did this, then I saw Car 1, now coming to a full stop in the middle of the intersection with his left turn signal on. As I mentioned, I already had started braking when I saw the commotion and braking of the cars in front of me, but it was too close, and raining and slippery, and I still rear-end the other driver's car. He then did the U-turn and stopped on the side of the road facing north bound, the light was still green at that point, so I followed him and stopped behind him.
Police showed up later and talked to both of us, although I didn't hear much of what the other driver said. I am not sure if he was given a ticket or summons as well.
I want to know what I should expect. The summons letter does not mention very much in terms of options, or ability to request disclosure. What will happen at the summons? I have read around this site a lot, and it seems like Careless Driving is very serious, but also a hard charge to prove, and I feel that I was in fact, paying attention to the traffic and driving carefully. I braked as soon as I saw others braking, but can't see 4 cars in front of me. I was not following too closely, but once a car in front of you swerves out of your lane to reveal a stopped object, there is not much time for anything. I slammed the brakes, but knew I did not have time to check my blind spot for swerving into the right lane, which would have been careless for not only me, but a potential other driver. Also my 2 month old was in the car seat in the back right, so I was not going to blindly change lanes. I also could not avoid the collision to the left because of the median.
After telling the insurance company what happened, they called and said that I was not at fault, and that the other insurance company has accepted liability, and that I didn't need to pay anything. Will this also help my case?
Any insight to this would be great, as I want to know,
1) what will happen
2) chances of it getting dropped
3) chances of lesser charge (still not desirable though)
Thank you all so much for your help, and this great site that has tons of information on it.
Being charged with something by police and how your insurance determines fault is two completely seperate things. So, for example, your insurance does not care whether you were charged or not, and the police don't care whether the insurance found you at fault or not. So (i) you can be charged by police AND be found at fault by insurace, or (ii) you can be charged by police but found NOT at fault by insurance, or (iii) you can NOT be charged by police but still found at fault by insurance, or (iv) you can NOT be charged by police and NOT be found at fault by insurance. So police charges and insurance at fault determination is mutually exclusive and one does not affect the other. Now I am not sure how to do it, but it would nice if you could get something from insurance saying the other company accepted full fault, as this COULD possibly help your case. Maybe somebody else can chime in on if this is possible/feasible. The summons date on the ticket is NOT your trial/court date and the police officer will not be there and none of the witnesses will be there (trial date will be set for a later date, but you still need to show up for the summons date). The prosecutor will probably meet with you before the Justice of the Peace comes out, and may or may not offer you a plea deal. My advice is that even if they offer you a plea deal, you should ask if you can review the disclosure before you decide how to plead. So your options at the summons date are: (i) plead guilty (not recommended); (ii) plead not guilty and request disclosure and a trial date (recommended if they do not offer you any plea deal); (iii) request disclosure before you decide how to plead, and set another summons date (recommended if they offer you a plea deal); Remember it is not your trial/court date so don't worry too much about what happens at the summons date. And really there is no way to know whether you can easily beat the charge until you review the disclosure (officers notes). Once you get a copy of officers notes, then post them here so we can review them.
Being charged with something by police and how your insurance determines fault is two completely seperate things. So, for example, your insurance does not care whether you were charged or not, and the police don't care whether the insurance found you at fault or not. So (i) you can be charged by police AND be found at fault by insurace, or (ii) you can be charged by police but found NOT at fault by insurance, or (iii) you can NOT be charged by police but still found at fault by insurance, or (iv) you can NOT be charged by police and NOT be found at fault by insurance. So police charges and insurance at fault determination is mutually exclusive and one does not affect the other.
Now I am not sure how to do it, but it would nice if you could get something from insurance saying the other company accepted full fault, as this COULD possibly help your case. Maybe somebody else can chime in on if this is possible/feasible.
The summons date on the ticket is NOT your trial/court date and the police officer will not be there and none of the witnesses will be there (trial date will be set for a later date, but you still need to show up for the summons date). The prosecutor will probably meet with you before the Justice of the Peace comes out, and may or may not offer you a plea deal. My advice is that even if they offer you a plea deal, you should ask if you can review the disclosure before you decide how to plead.
So your options at the summons date are:
(i) plead guilty (not recommended);
(ii) plead not guilty and request disclosure and a trial date (recommended if they do not offer you any plea deal);
(iii) request disclosure before you decide how to plead, and set another summons date (recommended if they offer you a plea deal);
Remember it is not your trial/court date so don't worry too much about what happens at the summons date.
And really there is no way to know whether you can easily beat the charge until you review the disclosure (officers notes). Once you get a copy of officers notes, then post them here so we can review them.
The reason you received a summons is because there's no set fine in regards to your charge. There's a minimum and a maximum penalty which are to be determined. The officer can't write down a set fine (there isn't any), so that's why you have a summons date. That's why there's currently very little in terms of options. Once you appear at your summons, the ball will start rolling and you can start from there. You don't have to stress out too much as it's more of an appearance than anything else. Insurance providers all use the industry standard Fault Determination Rules to determine who is at fault for an accident. It's not the same as being charged by a police officer under the HTA. You could beat a charge in regards to an accident and still be hit with a chargeable accident by your provider. For the most part, they are treated separately. Take note that Careless Driving is a serious offence. You may not have been charged by your insurance company for a chargeable accident, but they'll roast you if Careless Driving gets dumped on your driving record. It's the worst of the worst. Stunt, racing, impaired driving, driving without insurance and or license, hit and run... and Careless Driving. It's all treated the same. 100% increase and the possibility they'll just cancel your policy altogether. There's a lot to lose. Chances are you'll be offered a plea deal. Most likely they're going to offer you a minor charge (eg. following too closely). Your insurance provider may not even charge you for a first minor offense or they might issue a surcharge at something like 5%. If you compare it to Careless, it's not even close. There's some people who will argue Careless Driving is handed out way too much and becomes a blanket charge for lots of events. It probably is, but it's your insurance on the line at the end of the day. A plea deal isn't all that bad in this type of situation. You got to know when to pick your battles. You can always review disclosure up until your trial date and take a plea then. Maybe you get lucky and the officer moves to Mexico. If you're the type of person who doesn't like this type of thing hovering over your head for a year or so, you can accept a plea deal sooner than later and move on. It's up to you.
The reason you received a summons is because there's no set fine in regards to your charge. There's a minimum and a maximum penalty which are to be determined. The officer can't write down a set fine (there isn't any), so that's why you have a summons date.
That's why there's currently very little in terms of options. Once you appear at your summons, the ball will start rolling and you can start from there. You don't have to stress out too much as it's more of an appearance than anything else.
Insurance providers all use the industry standard Fault Determination Rules to determine who is at fault for an accident. It's not the same as being charged by a police officer under the HTA. You could beat a charge in regards to an accident and still be hit with a chargeable accident by your provider. For the most part, they are treated separately.
Take note that Careless Driving is a serious offence. You may not have been charged by your insurance company for a chargeable accident, but they'll roast you if Careless Driving gets dumped on your driving record. It's the worst of the worst. Stunt, racing, impaired driving, driving without insurance and or license, hit and run... and Careless Driving. It's all treated the same. 100% increase and the possibility they'll just cancel your policy altogether. There's a lot to lose.
Chances are you'll be offered a plea deal. Most likely they're going to offer you a minor charge (eg. following too closely). Your insurance provider may not even charge you for a first minor offense or they might issue a surcharge at something like 5%. If you compare it to Careless, it's not even close.
There's some people who will argue Careless Driving is handed out way too much and becomes a blanket charge for lots of events. It probably is, but it's your insurance on the line at the end of the day. A plea deal isn't all that bad in this type of situation. You got to know when to pick your battles. You can always review disclosure up until your trial date and take a plea then. Maybe you get lucky and the officer moves to Mexico. If you're the type of person who doesn't like this type of thing hovering over your head for a year or so, you can accept a plea deal sooner than later and move on. It's up to you.
Thank you both for your insight. I'm a lot less worried now about the summons, knowing that I have time and options after. I also have an email from my insurance provider that states just what you said jsherk. My summons is in 3 days, so I will let you all know how it goes.
Thank you both for your insight. I'm a lot less worried now about the summons, knowing that I have time and options after. I also have an email from my insurance provider that states just what you said jsherk.
My summons is in 3 days, so I will let you all know how it goes.
Seek out the crown means talk to the prosecutor. When you check in at the court room on your summons date, tell them you would like to meet with the prosecutor before everything starts.
Seek out the crown means talk to the prosecutor. When you check in at the court room on your summons date, tell them you would like to meet with the prosecutor before everything starts.
Thank you everyone. I went to the summons this morning and met with the prosecutor. Before I said anything, they told me all charges were dropped!!! So glad it's over now. Thank you again for all the insights, really really appreciate it.
Thank you everyone. I went to the summons this morning and met with the prosecutor. Before I said anything, they told me all charges were dropped!!!
So glad it's over now. Thank you again for all the insights, really really appreciate it.
I will be going to trial for my red light camera offence.
I'll be arguing two issues, centered on the fact that there are two essential elements of 144(18) - a) a vehicle approaching the intersection shall stop; and b) the vehicle shall not proceed until green. Both essential elements must be contravened beyond a reasonable doubt to be an offence.
1) My ticket says I (being the owner) am "charged…
I know that the RIDE program has been covered extensively in these great forums, but I have a question about the stop itself:
I recently was stopped for a RIDE Program and the officer asked me to roll the window down all of the way (I had it at half and could easily communicate with them). I told them that I could hear them just fine and they insisted I roll it down all of the way. Again I told…
Not sure the right place for this so if it needs to be moved please do so.
I was stopped today for 15 over the speed limit, I gave all the documents to the officer and he said he could not accept a photocopy of my ownership only the original I had a photo copy front and back and I had my plate sticker number with it.
he gave me a ticket for HWY ACT Section 7(5)(a) he said only the original would…
Hey! I'm from Sudbury Ontario. Hope that general talk is fine for this subject
I am very serious about looking for exact ruling about underfacing lighting
Section 14 clearly states:
Red and blue lights to the front restricted
(14.1) In addition to the lighting requirements in this Part, a police department vehicle may carry lamps that cast red and blue lights, but no other motor vehicle shall carry…
i was driving my dad's car when i was caught by the red light camera in Brampton. My dad would've to take time off work to go ask for a trial and then go to one.
Can i represent him? if yes, what do i need to do?
I was pulled over and told I went through a red light during a right turn. I learned through a friend who is a police constable that the one who pulled me over is new to the job (under a year, and possibly even the first month or two of real duty).
I was given a ticket for $180. I have some questions:
(1) Is this offense automatically associated with 3 demerit points? I see no mention of them on…
I got a ticket for 'Disobey Stop Sign' in November of 2013 (in York Region), requested disclosure and went to court in August of 2014. At my first appearance, I did not plea but requested an ajournment to to consult legal advice. The JOP set the next appearance in September.
I contacted a paralegal about my options. He told me that on my next appearance, if the police officer did not show, the…
I had a trial and found guilty, but the trial seemed to go wrong since the beginning.
The JP asked me if i am intending to take the stand- I said NO.
I asked how to submit my evidence-documents and photos.
JP said-i have to take the stand if i want to submit evidence.(Now i am finding this is wrong-i could introduce my evidence during cross examination and my defense would be much stronger)
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for motorists who drive at over 40 km/h at under 60 km/h zones, speed at 50 km/h at 60 to 90 km/h areas and…
Make big trucks go slower and the roads will become safer.
Obvious, isn't it? It's also obvious when you look out the window that the world is flat.
Last Monday, truckers in Ontario tried to mount a convoy to Queen's Park to show their opposition to electronic speed limiters. These devices, electronic chips in trucks' engine management systems, restrict speeds…
I was out on a four lane highway around Orangeville Ontario and I noticed a school bus coming south (I was going north). I kept my eyes on the bus in case it was going to stop. As I approached it, it was slowing down a little, but no lights, and especially no arm with the STOP sign. As I was just about to pass the bus, I still did not see the lights, nor did I see the STOP sign.
Hey everyone first off I'd like to say great website, I have been reading and it is very useful
I'm posting today as I'd like to get some feedback on my situation and have a couple of questions. Please excuse the vagueness in some areas - I don't want my case to be identifiable given the small town.
So I was driving up north and was pulled over by an OPP SUV for doing 31 over. Cop drove past me,…
Driving on a 80km/hr highway the car ahead hits the brakes and slows to 55, l slow down right behind him no reason to slow down traffic was moving between 80 and 90. I notice the driver is on the phone and looking through papers on the passenger seat. He begins to start to go a opp officer drives by doing 80 plus in oncoming lane turns around and says l was following to close. Told him what was…
My son was making a right turn at the intersection he had a green so slowed down looked and proceeded into the turn. It was pouring rain and the was a big pool of water as he got arround the curb. He tried to keep the car going sharp right however it slid into the car making a left turn. the lane he was turning into is very narrow and at a very busy corner. He paniced and left the scene only…
I had an collision the other day. I was turing left and ran into a car going straight in the opposite direction. The insurance company has already determined that I'm at fault, since I made the left turn. But I'm wondering whether I should go on trail and at least I might get rid of the ticket. The ticket was under 142(1)
I was told that if I go on court, both the guy I hit and the officer who…
question for a friend of mine.....says she got a 3 day suspension for giving a A on a roadside. Thing is she wasnt driving. She is a g2 driver and the car was parked in a parking lot, she just ran out to get something and turned the car on. Can a 3 day be issued if you arent driving on a highway - (I've read for impaired it doesnt matter, but 3 day isnt criminal)? And is there any way to…
I can't find the category for this post so I'm posting it here.
Two questions...
1. Are golf carts considered a 'vehicle' under the Highway traffic act? I know carts can't drive across roads or on roads but if you try to bring one from the USA into Canada they are considered a 'vehicle'.
2. If you are on private property are you allowed to carry 'opened' alcohol in your golf cart? I know golf…
I got pulled over (along with about 10 other cars) for going through a road closed sign. I had just pulled out of a parking lot pretty much right beside the road closed sign, and with about 4 cars behind me there wasn't much I could do but go through, so I think I have a good chance of fighting it. However, on my ticket under the Signature of issuing Provincial Offences Officer, it's left…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural area and I sometimes see vehicles doing mail delivery. The vehicle then started accelerating and…
I was pulled over yesterday in a community safety zone and told I was doing 84 in a 50. When i passed the officer I looked at my odometer and I was only doing 64. I was given a summons on the spot to appear in court at the end of June. Do I have any chance in this if it comes down to his word over mine. I was in the car alone but have travelled these same roads every day, twice a day for 6 years…
who is at fault when :a) a passenger opens door and jumps out of vehicle onto the road with traffic. b) he gets hit by a car travelling in the adjoining lane. c) traffic lights were green. d) pedestrian crossing was further up and indicated "no crossing" light e) the vehicle that he exited from leaves the scene as soon as accident occurred. f) no charges have been laid after police filed report…