Hi, I just recently notcied on my Ticket I received on 2008/11/26, the street signs have been mis-spelled. At: "E/B Steels Ave East At Kenney road" Both street names have been mis-spelled. I heard rumors that this makes the ticket void. Do I still need to file a Trial Option, that states I intent to appear in court? Please advise.
Hi,
I just recently notcied on my Ticket I received on 2008/11/26, the street signs have been mis-spelled.
At: "E/B Steels Ave East At Kenney road"
Both street names have been mis-spelled. I heard rumors that this makes the ticket void.
Do I still need to file a Trial Option, that states I intent to appear in court? Please advise.
Yes, select the trial option. I think you can fairly easily prove that the streets named do not exist, but that probably won't be enough to quash the ticket. Which sign were you ticketed for disobeying? Was it a "right lane exits" sign?
Yes, select the trial option. I think you can fairly easily prove that the streets named do not exist, but that probably won't be enough to quash the ticket. Which sign were you ticketed for disobeying? Was it a "right lane exits" sign?
If you select trial and go to the trial the court can fix all errors on the ticket. Do not respond to the ticket. The court cannot fix the errors if you do not respond to the ticket. You goal is to beat the ticket. Therefore, if you want to win, don't respond to the ticket at all. The court will convict you and can appeal at which time you will cite the French Languages Service Act. The appeal court cannot fix the errors on the ticket. The appeal court's sole task is to ensure the trial court made the correct decison, based upon the evidence before it. Since the ticket isn't in both languages clearly they will not have made the correct decision, since the ticket is not in both languages and it must be.
If you select trial and go to the trial the court can fix all errors on the ticket.
Do not respond to the ticket. The court cannot fix the errors if you do not respond to the ticket.
You goal is to beat the ticket. Therefore, if you want to win, don't respond to the ticket at all. The court will convict you and can appeal at which time you will cite the French Languages Service Act.
The appeal court cannot fix the errors on the ticket. The appeal court's sole task is to ensure the trial court made the correct decison, based upon the evidence before it. Since the ticket isn't in both languages clearly they will not have made the correct decision, since the ticket is not in both languages and it must be.
If you ignore the ticket, you get convicted. I'm assuming that you want the easiest way of beating this charge. The appeals process is a long and lengthy one with no guarantee of success. The clock is ticking on the charge, if you haven't decided to fight it yet. The "right lane exits" SIGN, if it was in Toronto, has to be bilingual. If the SIGN is not bilingual, you can cite the FLSA and the case R. v Myers indicating that the sign is invalid. York Region, however, is NOT a designated bilingual area per the French Language Services Act and the sign can be in English only and still be valid. I mention this because, as you know, Steeles is the boundary between Toronto and York Region. Take a photo of the sign with a date-time stamp, if it is English only AND in Toronto. Also, French Language Services Act designates that Government of Ontario ministries and some agencies must have French language services available. If you want to bet the farm that the officer not writing French on the ticket is sufficient to quash it, that's your call, but here's a link to the agency responsible for enforcing FLSA: http://www.ofa.gov.on.ca/english/FLSA.html. They'd be able to tell you who's obligated to use French and who isn't. From experience, the courts in Ottawa, which is extremely bilingual, get about one case a month where a Francophone got a ticket with only English written on it by the officer. My friend with the Ottawa Police was in court on more than one occasion where the argument that "French wasn't written on the ticket by the cop" was tried as a reason to quash it. It failed every time. Not saying it can't work but you should be aware of that.
If you ignore the ticket, you get convicted. I'm assuming that you want the easiest way of beating this charge. The appeals process is a long and lengthy one with no guarantee of success.
The clock is ticking on the charge, if you haven't decided to fight it yet. The "right lane exits" SIGN, if it was in Toronto, has to be bilingual. If the SIGN is not bilingual, you can cite the FLSA and the case R. v Myers indicating that the sign is invalid. York Region, however, is NOT a designated bilingual area per the French Language Services Act and the sign can be in English only and still be valid. I mention this because, as you know, Steeles is the boundary between Toronto and York Region. Take a photo of the sign with a date-time stamp, if it is English only AND in Toronto.
Also, French Language Services Act designates that Government of Ontario ministries and some agencies must have French language services available. If you want to bet the farm that the officer not writing French on the ticket is sufficient to quash it, that's your call, but here's a link to the agency responsible for enforcing FLSA:
They'd be able to tell you who's obligated to use French and who isn't. From experience, the courts in Ottawa, which is extremely bilingual, get about one case a month where a Francophone got a ticket with only English written on it by the officer. My friend with the Ottawa Police was in court on more than one occasion where the argument that "French wasn't written on the ticket by the cop" was tried as a reason to quash it. It failed every time. Not saying it can't work but you should be aware of that.
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…