No you can't appeal if you win. That's ridiculous.
It seems ridiculous, but should be allowed... How does the average person who can not afford a Supreme Court challenge stand up for everybody else and these court rulings recognized?
So after reading R v Jackson 2015 ONCA 832 (paragraph 45 to 59) I think that you could actually file an appeal ...
Search found 1722 matches
- Thu Sep 22, 2016 10:01 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Radar Manual- No tuning forks and No tracking history
- Replies: 84
- Views: 33136
- Thu Sep 22, 2016 8:56 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Catching a break?
- Replies: 53
- Views: 13830
- Wed Sep 21, 2016 7:14 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 50 km/h or more
- Topic: 490 days after ticket -Insurance cancelled
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8802
Re: 490 days after ticket -Insurance cancelled
You also quoted incorrectly...
Reg. 144/91: OATHS AND AFFIRMATIONS (and seems duplicated in Reg. 268/10: GENERAL)
2. The oath or affirmation of office to be taken by a police officer, special constable or First Nations Constable shall be in one of the following forms:
I solemnly swear (affirm) that I will be loyal to Her Majesty the Queen and ...
Reg. 144/91: OATHS AND AFFIRMATIONS (and seems duplicated in Reg. 268/10: GENERAL)
2. The oath or affirmation of office to be taken by a police officer, special constable or First Nations Constable shall be in one of the following forms:
I solemnly swear (affirm) that I will be loyal to Her Majesty the Queen and ...
- Wed Sep 21, 2016 3:40 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Accident while license suspended
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4205
Re: Accident while license suspended
I just found this:
https://www.fsco.gov.on.ca/en/auto/brochures/Pages/brochure_autoins.aspx
Exclusions in Standard Auto Policy
Recognize that:
Mechanical failure or breakdown, rusting, wear and tear, freezing or explosion within the engine and damage to tires, are not covered unless they result from an insured peril (such as a collision ...
https://www.fsco.gov.on.ca/en/auto/brochures/Pages/brochure_autoins.aspx
Exclusions in Standard Auto Policy
Recognize that:
Mechanical failure or breakdown, rusting, wear and tear, freezing or explosion within the engine and damage to tires, are not covered unless they result from an insured peril (such as a collision ...
- Wed Sep 21, 2016 3:37 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Accident while license suspended
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4205
Re: Accident while license suspended
My understanding is that the insurance company would have to cover any liability claims for damage (say to property or signs or telephone polls).
I am not sure about the vehicle itself though and whether they have to cover it or not.
Was the car and insurance in your sons name or in somebody else's?
I am not sure about the vehicle itself though and whether they have to cover it or not.
Was the car and insurance in your sons name or in somebody else's?
- Wed Sep 21, 2016 3:02 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Disobeying Lane Light (No Lane Light Present)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7651
Re: Disobeying Lane Light (No Lane Light Present)
There is no special form that you need to use. They have one that you can use if you want, but basically you just need to say "I am requesting disclosure for my ticket #12345. Please provide me with officers notes."
- Wed Sep 21, 2016 1:46 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Disobeying Lane Light (No Lane Light Present)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7651
Re: Disobeying Lane Light (No Lane Light Present)
You wait until the trial date to meet with the prosecutor. Or in you could try to meet with prosecutor before trial date if you want, but make sure you are past the 6 month mark from date of ticket.
As far as disclosure goes, you DO need to see the officers notes to see what he wrote down. The prosecutor will probably want to see them as well ...
As far as disclosure goes, you DO need to see the officers notes to see what he wrote down. The prosecutor will probably want to see them as well ...
- Wed Sep 21, 2016 10:20 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 50 km/h or more
- Topic: 490 days after ticket -Insurance cancelled
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8802
Re: 490 days after ticket -Insurance cancelled
My concept is that there needs to be harm, injury or damage. Harm can be defined as simply as "being scared", so nobody has to be hit or injured and nothing has be damaged for this to apply. An example would be erratic driving like weaving in and out of traffic on the 401.
I guess if I ever run for Premier's office, I won't get your vote!
I guess if I ever run for Premier's office, I won't get your vote!
- Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:48 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 50 km/h or more
- Topic: 490 days after ticket -Insurance cancelled
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8802
Re: 490 days after ticket -Insurance cancelled
I'd love for you to go and tell the family of someone killed by a speeder that you think speed enforcement is not doing what's right.
If enforcement was so effective then nobody would get killed by speeders!
Some speeds are not safe. But speed limits are not about safe speeds. They are just a random numbers on a sign.
I have seen 50 zones ...
If enforcement was so effective then nobody would get killed by speeders!
Some speeds are not safe. But speed limits are not about safe speeds. They are just a random numbers on a sign.
I have seen 50 zones ...
- Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:44 am
- Forum: Stunt Driving
- Topic: STUNT DRIVING CHARGE - NEED ADVICE
- Replies: 13
- Views: 10137
Re: STUNT DRIVING CHARGE - NEED ADVICE
Usually you do not request disclosure before a SUMMONS date. At a summons date there are several things that can happen:
(1) You can just plead guilty (not recommended).
(2) If offered a plea deal, you can plead guilty to plea deal. Not usually recommended, but in this case stunt driving is a SERIOUS offence for insurance purposes and your rates ...
(1) You can just plead guilty (not recommended).
(2) If offered a plea deal, you can plead guilty to plea deal. Not usually recommended, but in this case stunt driving is a SERIOUS offence for insurance purposes and your rates ...
- Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:32 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Disobeying Lane Light (No Lane Light Present)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7651
Re: Disobeying Lane Light (No Lane Light Present)
HTA says:
Obeying lane lights
144(10) Every driver shall obey every traffic control signal that applies to the lane that he or she is in.
Okay so this is good news for you!
Do NOT tell the prosecutor that the charge is the wrong one, until after 6 months have gone by. It you tell them it is the wrong charge, they could withdraw it and re-issue ...
Obeying lane lights
144(10) Every driver shall obey every traffic control signal that applies to the lane that he or she is in.
Okay so this is good news for you!
Do NOT tell the prosecutor that the charge is the wrong one, until after 6 months have gone by. It you tell them it is the wrong charge, they could withdraw it and re-issue ...
- Wed Sep 21, 2016 7:50 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Catching a break?
- Replies: 53
- Views: 13830
Re: Catching a break?
Actually the manuals for Decatur Genesis radar conveniently says nothing about regular maintenance or recalibration. Manual says if you press the test button and if it says PASS then the unit is in perfect working order and nothing could be wrong with it!
- Wed Sep 21, 2016 7:45 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 50 km/h or more
- Topic: 490 days after ticket -Insurance cancelled
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8802
Re: 490 days after ticket -Insurance cancelled
The excessive penalties described here are insurance costs, nothing to do with the police nor even the government.
The government makes insurance mandatory and therefore we have to pay for it or else they send their guys with guns to enforce it. The government is the one sending the police to charge for pre-crime speeding when there is no proof ...
The government makes insurance mandatory and therefore we have to pay for it or else they send their guys with guns to enforce it. The government is the one sending the police to charge for pre-crime speeding when there is no proof ...
- Wed Sep 21, 2016 7:38 am
- Forum: Stunt Driving
- Topic: STUNT DRIVING CHARGE - NEED ADVICE
- Replies: 13
- Views: 10137
Re: STUNT DRIVING CHARGE - NEED ADVICE
Did you receive a SUMMONS with the October 20 court date on it?
Or did you get a NOTICE OF OFFENCE and then you pled Not Guilty and requested a trial, and October 20 is the Trial date they sent you on a Notice of Trial?
Or did you get a NOTICE OF OFFENCE and then you pled Not Guilty and requested a trial, and October 20 is the Trial date they sent you on a Notice of Trial?
- Tue Sep 20, 2016 10:16 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Disobeying Lane Light (No Lane Light Present)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7651
Re: Disobeying Lane Light (No Lane Light Present)
What is the exact charge and section number on your ticket?
So you already plead not guilty and got a trial date?
So you already plead not guilty and got a trial date?