This is not the same as fighting a reduced speeding ticket because in this case you could end up being charged with both the obstruct plate AND the fail to stop.
Now, most likely the officer won't know you are fighting the ticket until you ask for disclosure. If you plead not guilty and request a trial and the trial date is more than 6 months from ...
Search found 1722 matches
- Wed Oct 12, 2016 8:26 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Licence Plate Obstruction
- Replies: 13
- Views: 12555
- Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:07 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Licence Plate Obstruction
- Replies: 13
- Views: 12555
Re: Licence Plate Obstruction
Yes they can give you a ticket for the thing from the dealer around your plate.
The officer has 6 months to give you a ticket for rolling the stop sign. So if you choose to fight the obstruct plate charge they may (or may not) write you up for rolling the stop sign.
The officer has 6 months to give you a ticket for rolling the stop sign. So if you choose to fight the obstruct plate charge they may (or may not) write you up for rolling the stop sign.
- Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:07 am
- Forum: Stunt Driving
- Topic: Stunt driving at 144 km/h in an 80 zone really need advise
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5483
Re: Stunt driving at 144 km/h in an 80 zone really need advi
The prosecutor has no obligation to offer you 49 over speeding. But they might. Most insurance companies consider 49 over just a MINOR infraction whereas they consider 50+ over and Stunt as a Serious offence. A serious offence will cause your insurance to skyrocket (more than double) and maybe even be cancelled.
So your court date that you have is ...
So your court date that you have is ...
- Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:55 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Insecure load - open for discussion
- Replies: 33
- Views: 17548
Re: Insecure load - open for discussion
If they try to get the other officer to testify, you can object because they did not provide you with his notes.
But they really have no reason to get the other officer to testify. So I would not worry about it. If he does show up and they are calling him to testify then you have a good reason to object to it and that should get him excluded.
But they really have no reason to get the other officer to testify. So I would not worry about it. If he does show up and they are calling him to testify then you have a good reason to object to it and that should get him excluded.
- Sun Oct 09, 2016 9:19 pm
- Forum: Stunt Driving
- Topic: STUNT DRIVING CHARGE - NEED ADVICE
- Replies: 13
- Views: 10542
Re: STUNT DRIVING CHARGE - NEED ADVICE
In Ontario you will see "shall" which means you must. There is no confusion about this word as the courts have decided "shall" means must and "may" means optional. I do not know the case law off the top of my head, but I have read it several times where this was decided.
FAA rules do not apply in Canada, only in the USA. Make sure you are reading ...
FAA rules do not apply in Canada, only in the USA. Make sure you are reading ...
- Fri Oct 07, 2016 11:54 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Trial Date Question
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2631
Re: Trial Date Question
Best option is to call them and ask them directly for the status.
- Fri Oct 07, 2016 11:52 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Speeding ticket (LIDAR) - very poor disclosure
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4441
Re: Speeding ticket (LIDAR) - very poor disclosure
1) yes
2) yes
3) yes
4) maybe. would not hurt to try
2) yes
3) yes
4) maybe. would not hurt to try
- Fri Oct 07, 2016 11:42 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: section 136(1)(a) trial - HELP
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4196
Re: section 136(1)(a) trial - HELP
I am not a lawyer and am not a paralegal and the folloing is not legal advice and is just my opinion, but I do not think the paralegal you hired is very experienced.
You do NOT have to show up to trial for provincial offences as long as you send somebody to represent you.
But I see that the paralegal wants you there in order to try and say "we ...
You do NOT have to show up to trial for provincial offences as long as you send somebody to represent you.
But I see that the paralegal wants you there in order to try and say "we ...
- Fri Oct 07, 2016 8:00 am
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: Fail to Obey a stop sign-ticket has no intersection
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4007
Re: Fail to Obey a stop sign-ticket has no intersection
Can you scan and post your ticket? If there is no section number at all, then this is a fatal error IF you do not show up for trial.
- Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:20 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Speeding ticket (LIDAR) - very poor disclosure
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4441
Re: Speeding ticket (LIDAR) - very poor disclosure
There are three copies to every ticket:
(1) Notice of Offence - the copy that you get.
(2) Certificate of Offence - the officers copy that gets submitted to the court.
(3) Enforcement Agency Record - the officers copy that they keep for their records.
They can not change the Certificate of Offence after they have given you the Notice of Offence ...
(1) Notice of Offence - the copy that you get.
(2) Certificate of Offence - the officers copy that gets submitted to the court.
(3) Enforcement Agency Record - the officers copy that they keep for their records.
They can not change the Certificate of Offence after they have given you the Notice of Offence ...
- Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:48 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Speeding ticket (LIDAR) - very poor disclosure
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4441
Re: Speeding ticket (LIDAR) - very poor disclosure
You can not count on the officers not showing up, but it does happen sometimes. When you check in with prosecutor, you can ask them if both officers are there. Some prosecutors will be honest and tell you yes or no. If one is not there, then ask the prosecutor if they are going to withdraw the charge. If both officers are not there, then you should ...
- Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:24 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Insecure load - open for discussion
- Replies: 33
- Views: 17548
Re: Insecure load - open for discussion
Section 111(2) reads:
Proper loading (2) No person shall operate or permit to be operated upon a highway a motor vehicle that carries a load or draws a vehicle that carries a load unless the load is loaded, bound, secured, contained or covered so that no portion of the load may become dislodged or fall, leak, spill or blow from the vehicle ...
Proper loading (2) No person shall operate or permit to be operated upon a highway a motor vehicle that carries a load or draws a vehicle that carries a load unless the load is loaded, bound, secured, contained or covered so that no portion of the load may become dislodged or fall, leak, spill or blow from the vehicle ...
- Thu Oct 06, 2016 8:49 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: Late Disclosure and Trial Date, 34 over
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4062
Re: Late Disclosure and Trial Date, 34 over
Yes it is a good angle to attack... basically you need to ask the officer what test they did and how they did it. You need to check the manual and see if the officer did everything they were supposed to do, the way they were supposed to do it. If they did not, then you get them to confirm what they did and how they did it. You then ask them if the ...
- Thu Oct 06, 2016 8:06 am
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: section 136(1)(a) trial - HELP
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4196
Re: section 136(1)(a) trial - HELP
If you have NOT got disclosure then your paralegal should NOT tell them you are ready for trial. Paralegal should say you are not ready for trial because you have not got disclosure and request an adjournment.
Failure to have disclosure at the first trial is not a reason to get ticket dismissed. Yes it should get adjourned to new date.
You might ...
Failure to have disclosure at the first trial is not a reason to get ticket dismissed. Yes it should get adjourned to new date.
You might ...
- Tue Oct 04, 2016 5:35 pm
- Forum: Stunt Driving
- Topic: Stunt driving- racing -- LOOKING FOR HELP
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3615
Re: Stunt driving- racing -- LOOKING FOR HELP
The roadside suspension and car being impounded does not affect her insurance at all.
If you get convicted, because you are listed on her policy, it will affect her insurance HUGE. If she takes you off her policy, then it will not affect her insurance at all, but you may not be allowed to drive her vehicle anymore.
What is the charge or charges ...
If you get convicted, because you are listed on her policy, it will affect her insurance HUGE. If she takes you off her policy, then it will not affect her insurance at all, but you may not be allowed to drive her vehicle anymore.
What is the charge or charges ...
- Tue Oct 04, 2016 2:06 pm
- Forum: Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act
- Topic: Provided insurance, officer didn't take it
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3910
Re: Provided insurance, officer didn't take it
Yes if the prosecutor is in a good mood, they MIGHT drop it. They don't have to, but they might so it is worth a try.
- Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:24 am
- Forum: Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act
- Topic: Provided insurance, officer didn't take it
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3910
Re: Provided insurance, officer didn't take it
What is the exact charge you got and the section number?
- Sun Oct 02, 2016 6:16 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Trial Date Question
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2631
Re: Trial Date Question
For future reference, usually you would have a trial date set in at most 6 months. Once you receive the Notice of Trial, you would then send a letter to the prosecutor asking for disclosure (officers notes, manuals, witness statements, etc.).
- Sun Oct 02, 2016 6:08 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Trial Date Question
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2631
Re: Trial Date Question
Sounds like good news for you! Call tomorrow and confirm it was withdrawn though just to make sure. You dont need to give them any details, other than just ask them to confirm the status.
Then the next time you are near an MTO office, you might want to go in and confirm there is nothing on your record regarding this incident.
Then the next time you are near an MTO office, you might want to go in and confirm there is nothing on your record regarding this incident.
- Fri Sep 30, 2016 9:29 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: 44km/h over - 5 Great Questions Inside :)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7066
Re: 44km/h over - 5 Great Questions Inside :)
Because you admit to speeding, you should NOT take the stand and should NOT testify and should NOT give your side of the story. This means that the only way to beat it is by cross-examining the officer and bringing reasonable doubt to what the officer said.
You should read these two threads:
http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic7039.html ...
You should read these two threads:
http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic7039.html ...
- Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:28 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: 36km over on HWY 401
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2606
Re: 36km over on HWY 401
Yes that should be fine. Ask the people at provincial offences office for contact info for prosecutors office as well.
Hand deliver or fax are the best way to make sure they get them.
Hand deliver or fax are the best way to make sure they get them.
- Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:18 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: 36km over on HWY 401
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2606
Re: 36km over on HWY 401
I would send a letter to BOTH the clerk at the provincial offences office AND to the prosecutor and make your request for a new date and the reasons why.
If you do it soon enough, then the JP should not have a problem rescheduling as you gave them sufficient notice. Of course they could say no and convict, so then you would have to ask for a re ...
If you do it soon enough, then the JP should not have a problem rescheduling as you gave them sufficient notice. Of course they could say no and convict, so then you would have to ask for a re ...
- Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:47 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: 36km over on HWY 401
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2606
Re: 36km over on HWY 401
So you got the ticket in April of 2015, pleaded Not Guilty, requested a trial, and they are just now (September of 2016) giving you a trial date?
If it has been over a year as you say, then you can file for an 11B Charter violation of your right to a speedy trial.
If you meant to say April 2016, then you should request disclosure as soon as ...
If it has been over a year as you say, then you can file for an 11B Charter violation of your right to a speedy trial.
If you meant to say April 2016, then you should request disclosure as soon as ...
- Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:20 am
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: 144/18
- Replies: 23
- Views: 9653
Re: 144/18
If it is a Part 1 Summons, and it was given to you on Sept 11, which was about 40 days after the incident, then you can ask for the charge to be quashed/dropped per Section 3(3) of POA:
"POA 3. Service (3) The offence notice or summons shall be served personally upon the person charged within thirty days after the alleged offence occurred."
"POA 3. Service (3) The offence notice or summons shall be served personally upon the person charged within thirty days after the alleged offence occurred."
- Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:12 am
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: 144/18
- Replies: 23
- Views: 9653
Re: 144/18
Please read the POA PART 1 and PART 3 before you ask more questions yourself...
Now, I just read thru the POA again, and let me correct a couple things I said:
(1) Under PART 1 (filing a certificate of offence), the officer can give you either a Notice of Offence or a Summons within 30 days of the incident . The officers copy of both of these is ...
Now, I just read thru the POA again, and let me correct a couple things I said:
(1) Under PART 1 (filing a certificate of offence), the officer can give you either a Notice of Offence or a Summons within 30 days of the incident . The officers copy of both of these is ...
- Fri Sep 30, 2016 9:41 am
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: 144/18
- Replies: 23
- Views: 9653
Re: 144/18
You will need to plead Not Guilty and request disclosure (officers notes AND all witness statements). Until you get those, we are just speculating and need to know what everybody said before we can determine how he came about giving you the red light ticket.
Now, you keep getting confused about the officer filling times... according to what you ...
Now, you keep getting confused about the officer filling times... according to what you ...
- Fri Sep 30, 2016 9:30 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: 44km/h over - 5 Great Questions Inside :)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7066
Re: 44km/h over - 5 Great Questions Inside :)
My suggestion is to plead not guilty, request a trial and get disclosure before deciding whether to take a plea.
WHAT SHOULD I DO? HOW DO I FIGHT MY TICKET?
Regardless of how simple or complex the charge is (from parking tickets to DUI), you have the RIGHT to a fair trial and a RIGHT to see the evidence they have against you. Even if you admit ...
WHAT SHOULD I DO? HOW DO I FIGHT MY TICKET?
Regardless of how simple or complex the charge is (from parking tickets to DUI), you have the RIGHT to a fair trial and a RIGHT to see the evidence they have against you. Even if you admit ...
- Thu Sep 29, 2016 7:54 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: 144/18
- Replies: 23
- Views: 9653
Re: 144/18
I do not see much benefit in it as it does not help prove which one of you ran the red light.
- Thu Sep 29, 2016 7:52 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: 44km/h over - 5 Great Questions Inside :)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7066
Re: 44km/h over - 5 Great Questions Inside :)
I stand corrected. Good to know.highwaystar wrote:If you don't show up for your ER, section 9(1)(b) of the POA says you are deemed not to want to dispute the charge. In other words, CONVICTION!!!
- Thu Sep 29, 2016 1:57 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: 44km/h over - 5 Great Questions Inside :)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7066
Re: 44km/h over - 5 Great Questions Inside :)
1) Early Resolution is a waste of time in most situations, unless you have proof that the charge should be dropped. There is no way a prosecutor is going to drop a charge completely just because you ask, and they don't really care about your side of the story as you can give that statement during trial if you want. If you do go to early resolution ...