Ontario Highway Traffic Act

Best thing would be to just ask them if its an xray machine when you get there.

If you take it trial and LOSE then they can raise the speed back up to the highest speed that the officer testifies. So he if says 140, then it would be SPEEDING 60 OVER. I do not think they can change it back to STUNT, but I am not sure so somebody else had better confirm how that works.

Good info!

Yes there are going to be issues with three people testifying about speed which is why I suggested a 50/50 chance of it working. What they say and how they say it will be important to the JP's decision. If it was just the driver testifying himself then the chances are pretty much 0 that JP will believe driver over officer. Add a couple more ...

If you and your witnesses take the stand and testify you were only going 65 in a 50, I honestly do not know how it will turn out for you. It is up to the JP... with three of you testifying the same thing, the JP might believe you all over the officer. But the JP might also say she thinks the three of you are all colluding and go with the officers ...

+1

I pretty much agree with everything you are saying.

The test button on the radar does NOT send or receive a beam form the antenna. It only verifies the internal electronics. So really it does not actually test that the unit is functioning properly at all.

I have a Diploma in Electronics Engineering Technology so I think I am going to start some ...

So the biggest negative you have is that the speeding 55 over would cause you to have super high insurance rates for the next three years. If you are not going to have your own insurance, then I guess it does not matter. The insurance would be the biggest concern that I would have with pleading guilty, so in this case you probably did the right ...

They do not think they need to provide them, so most likely you wont get them.

But I am still working on those anyways... just had a motion to try and get those but was denied by JP. My next step will be Charter challenge at the next trial date. Then hopefully onto Appeal court at some point to try and get a Judge to agree they need to be released.

Call the provincial offences office and ask for the status.

Do his notes say you were doing 107 in a 50 (57 over) but he dropped it to 49 over?

The key of course is to bring doubt to the accuracy of the radar device. Do you have the money to hire an expert witness to testify on your behalf? If you do, PM so we can talk more about it. If you do not, then your opinion (although correct) will not be ...

If you can bring doubt to the accuracy of the radar or lidar device the officer used in a speeding ticket, then you can probably get the radar evidence thrown out and beat the ticket.

There are two ways to do this:
(1) Bring your own expert witness to testify for you. Very expensive!
(2) Cross-examine the officer with questions that bring doubt to ...

So your court date tomorrow is NOT your trial. It is a summons date. You will have the following options:

(1) Plead guilty to the charge and be done with it (highly NOT recommended).
(2) Plead guilty to a plea deal charge that is offered to you by prosecutor. If they offer you 49 over speeding, then this is probably your best option.
(3) Tell them ...

In that particular subsection it is saying that it is the OFFICER that needs to post OR cause to be posted OR place OR cause to be placed.

I am not saying he has to do them all, but for the purpose of subsection 3, I would argue that he does. Especially since the title of section 134 is "Direction of traffic by police officer".

Anyways, you can ...

Subsection (2) says that the sign must be posted by the police officer ... This does not look like a sign that the police officer posted, but one posted by the construction company doing the work on the road.

It clearly doesn't say that.
I think it does...
Highway closing
134(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a police officer may close a ...