Ontario Highway Traffic Act

Not sure what else we can tell you. The reason the officer arrested you seems to be for a violation under s. 12 (1) HTA - which he is lawfully entitled to do as per s 217 of the HTA .

The HTA states an offence under 12 (1) HTA can happen anywhere.

I don't think anyone particularly enjoys being arrested and there's no where it says the cop has ...

Not telling you not to attempt a trial. However ... S. 217(2) permits the officer to arrest you for an offence under 12(1) of the HTA and the offence under 12(1) can occur anywhere even on private property. So the arrest and charge wasn't unlawful. You may have not liked the manner in which it occurred but nothing unlawful about it. The officer was ...

Moreover I can't see what would be useful in the manual other than the testing and operation portion of the manual. The officer (at least in my 10 years as an operator/instructor) won't likely be able to testify to anything other than the operation of the speed measurement device. They in most cases wouldn't have installed it or anything of that ...

If you delay your conviction until after you get your G you will avoid the suspension.

I don't know if this necessarily true. While the regulations discussing Novice Drivers don't cover what happens when you graduate on a first strike, it goes into detail when discussing a third.

(6) If the holder of a Class G1, G2, M1 or M2 drivers licence is ...

I won't say it happens everywhere but around here most police service don't provide notes in the e-ticket system. The e-ticket is submitted without evidence on it and all notes are in notebook.

Based on the severity of the collision the police could also get a warrant/production order for the uber records to prove you were or were not in the area. However if it's not a serious injury collision I doubt they would go through the trouble

Lying is not necessarily obstruction .

Obstruction under s. 129 states :

129 Every one who

(a) resists or wilfully obstructs a public officer or peace officer in the execution of his duty or any person lawfully acting in aid of such an officer,


(b) omits, without reasonable excuse, to assist a public officer or peace officer in the execution ...

yes

Any idea what those two typed pages are? They are not signed. Are the notes required to be signed?

Its hard to say what the pages are unless you tell us what they say .. typically notes aren't signed.

It could be notes if is a typed page from an eticket , notes can also be handwritten from the back of the offence notice that the officer ...

Jsherk, I've been lurking on this forum for about a year now without joining or posting. Your posts continually become more and more borderline freeman of the land or sovereign citizen like. Just sayin..

You could ask the prosecutor to amend it to ''Drive with seat belt inoperative s. 106(1) w/ total payable $240.00'' at least it saves you some points, I have seen it done more than once.

A ''rolling right turn'' is still a ''Fail to stop at red light'' and warrants the $325.00 total payable.

Photo enforcement is coming , red light cameras are only the beginning. Might as well get used to it.

Take the City of Edmonton for example which is now testing a mobile unmarked photo radar unit and dozens of photo enforcement sites ...

motorider wrote:Also...is it their responsibility to prove i was in fact the driver of the motorcycle, or mine to prove i wasn't. (Which im not sure how i could aside from saying it wasnt)

Request disclosure and review it.

The OP didn't upload his tickets. I did. What I was trying to show is that I believe that he is telling the truth behind the false charges. My headlights weren't out but I still got charged for it. Bear in mind, I was originally pulled for Stunt Driving, and he gave me a break, which is what I'm assuming happened to the OP.

Your original post 2 ...