I got a hand-held device ticket in early April 2018. I received the Notice of Trial in early July 2018. I submitted my Disclosure Request immediately after receiving the Notice of Trial. I have been asking the York Region Prosecutor's Office about the disclosure almost every month 2 months after I submitted my request. However, I still haven't received it yet. My court date is this week. Any advice what I should do when I go to trial without receiving the disclosure I requested? Thanks
I got a hand-held device ticket in early April 2018. I received the Notice of Trial in early July 2018. I submitted my Disclosure Request immediately after receiving the Notice of Trial.
I have been asking the York Region Prosecutor's Office about the disclosure almost every month 2 months after I submitted my request. However, I still haven't received it yet.
My court date is this week.
Any advice what I should do when I go to trial without receiving the disclosure I requested?
Go to court with several copies of your e-mails, logs of your phone calls, etc. When you arrive, the Prosecutor will ask you what you want to do. Tell him or her that you requested disclosure eight months ago and have followed up diligently. The Prosecutor may have copies of your e-mails to verify; if not, give him or her one of the copies. If the Prosecutor has the disclosure, he or she will give it to you so you can review it. You will probably not be in a position to make a full answer and defence, so you should ask for an adjournment to give you time to study the disclosure. The Prosecutor may object, so dig in your heels if necessary. Make sure the JP notes that the delay is the result of the Crown's failure to provide timely disclosure. That way, the "clock" continues to run if it takes too long to deal with your ticket. If the Prosecutor does not have it, one of three things will happen. (a) The Prosecutor says or does nothing. Tell him or her you will be seeking an adjournment for disclosure, then sit down and wait your turn (see more below). (b) The Prosecutor will offer you an adjournment for disclosure. The JP will agree to it. Again, make sure the adjournment is noted as being on the part of the prosecution. (c) The Prosecutor will acknowledge that his or her office does not have and is not likely to receive the disclosure and will withdraw the charge (this is the least likely outcome). Unless you see something in the disclosure that clearly hurts the prosecution's case, do not, under any circumstances, allow the trial to proceed. If the Prosecutor does not offer you an adjournment (as described in outcome (a) above), ask for one. Tell the JP you need the disclosure to make full answer and defence. This is the same argument as the one you would make if the Prosecutor gives you disclosure on the spot.
Go to court with several copies of your e-mails, logs of your phone calls, etc. When you arrive, the Prosecutor will ask you what you want to do. Tell him or her that you requested disclosure eight months ago and have followed up diligently. The Prosecutor may have copies of your e-mails to verify; if not, give him or her one of the copies.
If the Prosecutor has the disclosure, he or she will give it to you so you can review it. You will probably not be in a position to make a full answer and defence, so you should ask for an adjournment to give you time to study the disclosure. The Prosecutor may object, so dig in your heels if necessary. Make sure the JP notes that the delay is the result of the Crown's failure to provide timely disclosure. That way, the "clock" continues to run if it takes too long to deal with your ticket.
If the Prosecutor does not have it, one of three things will happen. (a) The Prosecutor says or does nothing. Tell him or her you will be seeking an adjournment for disclosure, then sit down and wait your turn (see more below). (b) The Prosecutor will offer you an adjournment for disclosure. The JP will agree to it. Again, make sure the adjournment is noted as being on the part of the prosecution. (c) The Prosecutor will acknowledge that his or her office does not have and is not likely to receive the disclosure and will withdraw the charge (this is the least likely outcome).
Unless you see something in the disclosure that clearly hurts the prosecution's case, do not, under any circumstances, allow the trial to proceed. If the Prosecutor does not offer you an adjournment (as described in outcome (a) above), ask for one. Tell the JP you need the disclosure to make full answer and defence. This is the same argument as the one you would make if the Prosecutor gives you disclosure on the spot.
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…