Hta Charge Modified To By-law Charge (advice?)

Got a Failing to obey signs traffic ticket?
Post Reply
GTAcommuter17
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 5:53 pm

Hta Charge Modified To By-law Charge (advice?)

Unread post by GTAcommuter17 »

Earlier today I received an offence notice in the city of Mississauga. Rather than a charge under HTA the officer issued a charge under City of Mississauga By-Law 555/2000. The correct By-Law is 555-00 so I'm wondering if this is a fatal error and/or an error that will allow me to have the charge withdrawn?


I certainly appreciate that the officer was looking to help me by charging the By-Law infraction rather than the HTA infraction. I'm curious if the officer intentionally wrote an incorrect By-Law so I could fight the offence notice and have it dismissed?


Any input and suggestions/assistance very much appreciated.

Zatota
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2016 10:09 am
Location: Thornhill

Posting Awards

Unread post by Zatota »

They mean the same thing. The absence of the first two digits won't change anything.

GTAcommuter17
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 5:53 pm

Unread post by GTAcommuter17 »

I think you have it backwards.


The By-Law on the books is 555-00 but the By-Law written by hand on the offence notice is 555/2000.


That would make them the same thing?


Edit: the latter (to me) looks like 555 out of 2000.

Zatota
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2016 10:09 am
Location: Thornhill

Posting Awards

Unread post by Zatota »

"555-00" and "555/2000" both mean By-Law Number 555, enacted in 2000.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics

Return to “Failing to obey signs”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests