I am still a little unclear on the situation, so I am re posting with all the details that may be relevant. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
My son was convicted of Class G-2 Licence Contravention. He was originally charged with BAC above 0. He was a .003 on the roadside screening device. He missed his court date and was convicted in absentia. He then found out at the court that he was convicted and appealed the decision (it was allowed) and plead guilty to 32-9 Driving in Contravention. Paid the fine on time and thought this was the end of it.
His driver abstract from the MTO shows the violation and then a suspension for 7 months (he recieved no notice of suspension until getting an Insurance quote they informed him, that is why he got the abstract). It then shows the suspension was expired or rescinded, on the date it would have been reinstated according to the original suspension. It seems like a rather lengthy suspension for the above conviction. He has nothing else on his driver abstract.
When he plead guilty to driving in Contravention he understood form the prosecutor that it would be 0 demerit points and no suspension just a fine. Can the MTO suspend your licence for any period they wish for the HTA 32-9 violation?
I do not know if 32-9 is a suspension offence.
If the suspension is proper and his abstract is correct, case closed for me. I just would like to be sure I understand the process and punishment as this has had a dramatic affect on Insurance premiums (naturally).
Thanks for any help.
Ed