I haven't read the sections that apply. Post the exact provision and we can tell you what we think it says.
Always remember though, what you read on line is opinion; not fact.
Don't go buying or building something just because someone online told you it was okay.
Search found 256 matches
- Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:22 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: lift laws, bumper height laws, headlight height laws
- Replies: 17
- Views: 35461
- Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:39 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Zero Tolerance for 1st 5 years of driving...
- Replies: 78
- Views: 24144
Re: Zero Tolerance for 1st 5 years of driving...
So the new law also prohibits a teenage driver from having more than one other teenager in the car. This is pathetic. A 19 year old can vote and fight in wars, but he cannot have more than one other teenager in his car. Ha!
- Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:49 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: lift laws, bumper height laws, headlight height laws
- Replies: 17
- Views: 35461
Re: lift laws, bumper height laws, headlight height laws
Whatever is legal or illegal can be found hre.
Read every regulation to be sure. Cut and paste the entire address below into your address bar.
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/Browse?queryText=dDocName+%3Cmatches%3E+%60ELAWS_STATUTES_*_e%60+%3CAND%3E+%28xRegUnderAct+%3Cstarts%3E+%60H%60%29&resultCount=200&sortField=dDocTitle&sortOrder=ASC&startIndex=1 ...
Read every regulation to be sure. Cut and paste the entire address below into your address bar.
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/Browse?queryText=dDocName+%3Cmatches%3E+%60ELAWS_STATUTES_*_e%60+%3CAND%3E+%28xRegUnderAct+%3Cstarts%3E+%60H%60%29&resultCount=200&sortField=dDocTitle&sortOrder=ASC&startIndex=1 ...
- Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:06 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Zero Tolerance for 1st 5 years of driving...
- Replies: 78
- Views: 24144
Re: Zero Tolerance for 1st 5 years of driving...
The kid had two speeding tickets and was later killed drinking and driving. If he had lost his licences, the chances are he would still have driven as it doesn't sound like he had much respect for laws.
Some people think their is a "legal limit" of .08. They are incorrect. There is no such think as a legal limit. You can be charged for impaired ...
Some people think their is a "legal limit" of .08. They are incorrect. There is no such think as a legal limit. You can be charged for impaired ...
- Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:47 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Definition of "lane" for 142(1)
- Replies: 29
- Views: 7154
Re: Definition of "lane" for 142(1)
Actually, it's my mistake. I just re-read the thread. You did say damage to the car, no injuries. Sorry.
The cop is clueless, or gave you a major break. The turn offence doesn't apply. You crossed into another lane, even though it has no lines. An accident occurred. In my opinion he had to charge you with careless driving, but he didn't ...
The cop is clueless, or gave you a major break. The turn offence doesn't apply. You crossed into another lane, even though it has no lines. An accident occurred. In my opinion he had to charge you with careless driving, but he didn't ...
- Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:35 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Definition of "lane" for 142(1)
- Replies: 29
- Views: 7154
Re: Definition of "lane" for 142(1)
You said there was no accident i.e., damage or injury?
- Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:19 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Fail to obey stop sign sec. 136(1)(a)
- Replies: 26
- Views: 8323
Re: Fail to obey stop sign sec. 136(1)(a)
The 6 month limitation period can be tricky. If you were issued a certificate of offence under Part I of the POA, it must be served upon the accused within 30 days.
If one makes the cop or court aware any errors after 30 days, but within 6 months, it appears the cop can simply reissue the ticket with corrections under Part III of the POA, but he ...
If one makes the cop or court aware any errors after 30 days, but within 6 months, it appears the cop can simply reissue the ticket with corrections under Part III of the POA, but he ...
- Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:08 pm
- Forum: Failing to remain at the scene of a collision
- Topic: car-bicycle accident- fail to remain...
- Replies: 158
- Views: 54009
Re: car-bicycle accident- fail to remain...
You just want to win. Get the fail to report of his record, cancel the fine, get your $500 back from the counsel who mispresented you, and not have to pay the driver any damages since he caused the accident.
- Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:37 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Disclosure questions
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2850
- Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:04 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Definition of "lane" for 142(1)
- Replies: 29
- Views: 7154
Re: Definition of "lane" for 142(1)
Try the Supreme Court of Canada for caselaw with respect to lanes.
When did you get the ticket?
Have you sent in the notice to defend yet?
I don't think the charge will stick as it doesn't apply, in my view, as you also mentioned.
This is not a case involving turning. I think he may've had to charge you with careless driving in such a case ...
When did you get the ticket?
Have you sent in the notice to defend yet?
I don't think the charge will stick as it doesn't apply, in my view, as you also mentioned.
This is not a case involving turning. I think he may've had to charge you with careless driving in such a case ...
- Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:02 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Definition of "lane" for 142(1)
- Replies: 29
- Views: 7154
Re: Definition of "lane" for 142(1)
Interesting case. Keep searching case law and you might find something to help you.
So, you're traveling on a road with no centre line and the cop claims you went into the oncoming lane of traffic while rounding a bend in the roadway and caused a collison?
If so, then you're right, the section yo were charged under does not apply.
Do you know ...
So, you're traveling on a road with no centre line and the cop claims you went into the oncoming lane of traffic while rounding a bend in the roadway and caused a collison?
If so, then you're right, the section yo were charged under does not apply.
Do you know ...
- Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:21 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: O.P.P officers avoid instant penalties!
- Replies: 37
- Views: 14028
Re: O.P.P officers avoid instant penalties!
The other major problem with s. 172 is that it's too vague in some regards.
The words used are completely subjective and essentially arbitrary, and provided no guidance to allow courts to reasonably interpret the words or devise a test that achieved the legislative objective. Some terms are so open-ended that it failed to delineate with sufficient ...
The words used are completely subjective and essentially arbitrary, and provided no guidance to allow courts to reasonably interpret the words or devise a test that achieved the legislative objective. Some terms are so open-ended that it failed to delineate with sufficient ...
- Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:04 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: O.P.P officers avoid instant penalties!
- Replies: 37
- Views: 14028
Re: O.P.P officers avoid instant penalties!
I understand. But here's the thing with s. 172.
I called three different OPP and three different local cops to see what type of offence s. 172 is. They ALL claim it's an absolute liability offence.
The court claims it's a strict liability offence.
The reason why the cops impound cars on the spot is because they claim it's an absolute ...
I called three different OPP and three different local cops to see what type of offence s. 172 is. They ALL claim it's an absolute liability offence.
The court claims it's a strict liability offence.
The reason why the cops impound cars on the spot is because they claim it's an absolute ...
- Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:46 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Fail to obey stop sign sec. 136(1)(a)
- Replies: 26
- Views: 8323
Re: Fail to obey stop sign sec. 136(1)(a)
Fight it.
A stop sign is not a traffic signaling device.
Do not inform the police of the error on the ticket.
If you are correct that there is no stop sign, go take pictures of the traffic lights at this location. Be sure the camera posts a date on the picture.
Then, do not respond to the ticket at all. Fight it on appeal that the ticket ...
A stop sign is not a traffic signaling device.
Do not inform the police of the error on the ticket.
If you are correct that there is no stop sign, go take pictures of the traffic lights at this location. Be sure the camera posts a date on the picture.
Then, do not respond to the ticket at all. Fight it on appeal that the ticket ...
- Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:03 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Definition of "lane" for 142(1)
- Replies: 29
- Views: 7154
Re: Definition of "lane" for 142(1)
Tell us what happened to you?
I will guess that the answer is no. You would have to read the entire Act, all the regulations, find case law with other examples, and/or use a dictionary definition to find the correct answer, though.
I will guess that the answer is no. You would have to read the entire Act, all the regulations, find case law with other examples, and/or use a dictionary definition to find the correct answer, though.