Well you had better check with your insurance company on the status (Minor, Major, Serious) of each charge. Obviously minor charges are preferred.
If you can get a charge changed to OWNER instead of as DRIVER, then it does NOT affect your insurance at all, and there are NO demerit points. Only charges to DRIVER incur demerits and insurance ...
Search found 1722 matches
- Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:58 am
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: 144(18) Disclosure
- Replies: 19
- Views: 9872
- Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:52 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Stupid Turn
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1939
Re: Stupid Turn
If there was a red light camera then you will get a ticket (to the owner of the vehicle) because light was red.
It is to the OWNER not the driver, so there are no demerit points and no insurance increases.
If there was no camera then you will not get a ticket.
It is to the OWNER not the driver, so there are no demerit points and no insurance increases.
If there was no camera then you will not get a ticket.
- Tue Nov 15, 2016 2:01 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: no valid permit - no valid sticker plate 7(1)(a) 7(1)(c)(i)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4674
Re: no valid permit - no valid sticker plate 7(1)(a) 7(1)(c)
Take a look at this thread, towards the bottom of page 1 and onto page 2:
http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic7631.html
The sticker is NOT required per Ontario Regualtion 628
https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/900628
Section 6(2) says:
Evidence of validation for a permit shall be affixed to a number plate for the vehicle in ...
http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic7631.html
The sticker is NOT required per Ontario Regualtion 628
https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/900628
Section 6(2) says:
Evidence of validation for a permit shall be affixed to a number plate for the vehicle in ...
- Tue Nov 15, 2016 1:55 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: no driver's license 32(1)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7147
Re: no driver's license 32(1)
Section 32(1) says:
Drivers licence
32. (1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway unless the motor vehicle is within a class of motor vehicles in respect of which the person holds a drivers licence issued to him or her under this Act .
So now we need to dig into the part that says "issued under this act". Does a drivers license ...
Drivers licence
32. (1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway unless the motor vehicle is within a class of motor vehicles in respect of which the person holds a drivers licence issued to him or her under this Act .
So now we need to dig into the part that says "issued under this act". Does a drivers license ...
- Tue Nov 15, 2016 1:50 pm
- Forum: Careless Driving
- Topic: Stressing out......
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3893
Re: Stressing out......
Okay it is under REGULATION 340/94 ...
that is why I could not find it. It is section 5.(1) of that regulation that says:
5. (1) The holder of a Class G1 drivers licence may drive a Class G1 motor vehicle on a highway if a holder of a Class A, B, C, D, E, F or G drivers licence or its equivalent authorizing the holder to drive the motor vehicle ...
that is why I could not find it. It is section 5.(1) of that regulation that says:
5. (1) The holder of a Class G1 drivers licence may drive a Class G1 motor vehicle on a highway if a holder of a Class A, B, C, D, E, F or G drivers licence or its equivalent authorizing the holder to drive the motor vehicle ...
- Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:11 am
- Forum: Careless Driving
- Topic: Stressing out......
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3893
Re: Stressing out......
Okay well again section 31 and 51 don't make any sense either for the charges of fail to surrender card and driving g1 without licensed drivers. Scan the tickets and post so we can figure out correct charges.
They MIGHT offer you a deal to plead guilty to one and drop the other two, but there is no guarantee for this.
They MIGHT offer you a deal to plead guilty to one and drop the other two, but there is no guarantee for this.
- Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:51 am
- Forum: Careless Driving
- Topic: Stressing out......
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3893
Re: Stressing out......
I recommend that you do NOT tell anybody (not the officer, not the prosecutor, not the JP) that you did not have insurance because that is a $5000 fine and they will throw everything they can at you.
Section 53 says:
Driving while drivers licence suspended
53. (1) Every person who drives a motor vehicle or street car on a highway while his or her ...
Section 53 says:
Driving while drivers licence suspended
53. (1) Every person who drives a motor vehicle or street car on a highway while his or her ...
- Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:19 am
- Forum: Careless Driving
- Topic: Stressing out......
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3893
Re: Stressing out......
So you did NOT get a ticket for "not having insurance", but you did get a ticket for "not surrendering insurance card"?
Can you list the section numbers for each of the three charges?
Can you list the section numbers for each of the three charges?
- Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:48 am
- Forum: Careless Driving
- Topic: Stressing out......
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3893
Re: Stressing out......
So you already got charged with Careless driving, which would have caused your insurance to increase a HUGE amount already. More charges like the ones you mentioned are going to cause another huge increase, or you may not even be able to get insurance after this.
Did you have insurance on the vehicle but just did not have card with you, or you did ...
Did you have insurance on the vehicle but just did not have card with you, or you did ...
- Mon Nov 14, 2016 8:53 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: No written notes only In car camera from police
- Replies: 33
- Views: 15263
Re: No written notes only In car camera from police
The officers remarks about the lines that are not there may help you a little, but in the end the only part that matters is if the officer says you did not stop.
If there is no by-law for the stop sign though, then you need to make sure you bring that up at the trial. If you can even get a response from somebody in the municipality saying that ...
If there is no by-law for the stop sign though, then you need to make sure you bring that up at the trial. If you can even get a response from somebody in the municipality saying that ...
- Mon Nov 14, 2016 2:50 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: 144(18) Disclosure
- Replies: 19
- Views: 9872
Re: 144(18) Disclosure
So if you go to trial then they will want to charge you with both and that will be two MINOR charges against your insurance.
If you take the plea, then you will only have the one MINOR charge.
Tickets like this are very very hard to beat because it is basically your word against the officers. So with no video evidence and no other witnesses you ...
If you take the plea, then you will only have the one MINOR charge.
Tickets like this are very very hard to beat because it is basically your word against the officers. So with no video evidence and no other witnesses you ...
- Mon Nov 14, 2016 12:27 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: 144(18) Disclosure
- Replies: 19
- Views: 9872
Re: 144(18) Disclosure
So unless you have video (or another eye witness) that will testify that the light was not red when you went thru it, you will most likely lose at trial.
So let's consider some options... Sometimes prosecutors will drop a charge like "fail to have insurance" if you show them the valid one and plead guilty to the other charge. The other thing to ...
So let's consider some options... Sometimes prosecutors will drop a charge like "fail to have insurance" if you show them the valid one and plead guilty to the other charge. The other thing to ...
- Mon Nov 14, 2016 8:44 am
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: No written notes only In car camera from police
- Replies: 33
- Views: 15263
Re: No written notes only In car camera from police
So did you drive right on thru the stop sign without even slowing down because you did not see it, or did you slow down and almost stop but roll thru?
The reason I ask is that if you did not stop because you did not see it then the cement truck thing would be good and you need to find the law/regulation about the 60metres. However if you slowed ...
The reason I ask is that if you did not stop because you did not see it then the cement truck thing would be good and you need to find the law/regulation about the 60metres. However if you slowed ...
- Mon Nov 14, 2016 7:42 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Disobey Sign 182 (2) - Mississauga - turn and no turn signs
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4842
Re: Disobey Sign 182 (2) - Mississauga - turn and no turn si
Take the win anyway you can! Congratulations! 
- Mon Nov 14, 2016 7:35 am
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: 144(18) Disclosure
- Replies: 19
- Views: 9872
Re: 144(18) Disclosure
Ticketcombat site has not been updated for years. The courts have decided that it is now up to YOU to check if disclosure is ready, and it is not up to the prosecution to have to hunt you down. So if it was ready and you did not check then they will count this first adjourment time delay against you not the prosecution.
As far as fighting the red ...
As far as fighting the red ...