Re: Driving without Headlights...Interpretation of Law Simon Borys wrote:When I had a person claiming their fog lights were head lights for the purpose of 62(1), I charged under O/Reg 596 s. 2(1) for the lack of high/low beam capability. It's an $85/110 fine as well.
Squishy wrote:That is the correct wordin…
Re: Driving without Headlights...Interpretation of Law Hi Stanton,
The reason I'm saying that my ticket should not be valid is based on the fact that the officer gave me that ticket on the incorrect perception that "headlights" are required. The ticket says "Drive without headlights - motor ve…
Driving without Headlights...Interpretation of Law So my luck (and arrogance) has finally run out. But I still need to understand if I'm interpreting Section 62(1) correctly.
Background: I've been driving around GTA for several months now with no headlights, only my fog lights on. I've done this pretenti…
