MadCow wrote:

Well the road was completely empty at that part, not even parked cars.

Already contradicting yourself here... you previously wrote

MadCow wrote:

He checked no, even though there were 3 others in the car with me, and at least 20 others who saw what happened

There is way more to this than what you are telling all of us.

Bookm wrote:

Careless Driving is intended to apply to drivers' who's actions would be considered inadvertent or negligent. I wouldn't think this section applies to your situation. You conducted yourself in a purposeful way. No negligence was present. There are other sections of the HTA that would apply to your scenario. They weren't used. The officer was being lazy (IMO).

If there are multiple infractions within a close time frame, I will and directed by our courts to lay the careless charge!

(ie, fail to signal, improper turn)

or

where there is an offence,while seing the driver talking on a cellphone.

hwybear wrote:

MadCow wrote:

Well the road was completely empty at that part, not even parked cars.

Already contradicting yourself here... you previously wrote

MadCow wrote:

He checked no, even though there were 3 others in the car with me, and at least 20 others who saw what happened

There is way more to this than what you are telling all of us.

Those people were behind me, I accelerated after I passed by them driving slowly.