OPP Officer Charged

Moderators: admin, hwybear, Radar Identified, Reflections, Decatur, bend

Post Reply

User avatar
hwybear
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2933
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!

Moderator

by: hwybear on
Mon May 26, 2008 8:22 am

This is old news. There is way more to this then just what was in the paper and how it came about. I am not of liberty to speak about it!
*********************************************************
There is also part of the definition under the definitions in the stunt section, and wonder how it applies..(coles version)...excemptions to the act...
- fire (while responding to a call)
- EMS (while responding to a call OR transporting a patient)
- Police (while on-duty/lawful execution of our duties)
Why would the Act not be specific like fire and EMS and say must be responding?
Also according to the PSA (Police Service Act) we are on-duty 24/7, until we officially retire.

It will be interesting of the outcome and how it came about.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Top

User avatar
Reflections
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1490
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm
Location: somewhere in traffic

Moderator

by: Reflections on
Mon May 26, 2008 9:48 am

Like you said, there is more to this then just the charge. I, Joe Public, would like to know the whole story. Just hope we get it.
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
Top

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics

Return to “General Talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests