A place to discuss any general Highway Traffic Act related items.

Moderators: Radar Identified, Reflections, admin, hwybear, Decatur, bend

User avatar
Posts: 2934
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!

Posting Awards


by: hwybear on

This is old news. There is way more to this then just what was in the paper and how it came about. I am not of liberty to speak about it!


There is also part of the definition under the definitions in the stunt section, and wonder how it applies..(coles version)...excemptions to the act...

- fire (while responding to a call)

- EMS (while responding to a call OR transporting a patient)

- Police (while on-duty/lawful execution of our duties)

Why would the Act not be specific like fire and EMS and say must be responding?

Also according to the PSA (Police Service Act) we are on-duty 24/7, until we officially retire.

It will be interesting of the outcome and how it came about.

Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
User avatar
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm
Location: somewhere in traffic


by: Reflections on

Like you said, there is more to this then just the charge. I, Joe Public, would like to know the whole story. Just hope we get it.

http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
Post a Reply

Return to “General Talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest