I won't get into the specifics of the case, but the paralegal's defense for me involves showing up for my trial date and pointing out to the prosecutor that a serious error has occurred with the charge (which could involve the issuing officer being charged with lying on the summons), and basically saying this should be dismissed in order to avoid this from occurring. My paralegal says they will either throw out the ticket at that point, or they will correct the error that occurred (don't ask, but according to the circumstances it IS possible) and order a new trial date with the correction made and then proceed. At this point I will be charged with the original offense, but then he will take it to appeal. He also said something about filing an 11a (which is not the 11b which has to do with having a trial in a reasonable amount of time, so I'm not too sure what this means). If this occurs, the paralegal says that he will charge me another $800 because this isn't covered under the original $600 I had to pay for the original offense (and another possible up to $200 for court documents!?!). Sorry if my situation is a bit vague or confusing, which in most part is due to my lack of knowledge concerning anything legal, but all I'm really asking in this case is, does it seem proper that he charge me another $800 to see this case to the conclusion. It doesn't seem right to me even though more work is possibly going to be involved - shouldn't the original fee cover it? Just wondering what other paralegals have to say. Thanks for your time.
-
UnluckyOne
- Newbie

- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 7:55 pm
Can a paralegal charge more if case becomes more involved?
Re: Can a paralegal charge more if case becomes more involve
Lawyers and paralegals can charge what they want pretty much. It's our great Canadian justice system that allows true justice for all that can afford it. Once I paid paralegal $500 for trial then another $1500 for appeal.
I am not sure what "serious error" mean but you should read up on Fatal Errors ... if there is a Fatal Error on the ticket, then you should NOT got to trial (and not have anybody attend for you) and if the JP sees the error they will drop the charge. If the JP does not see the error, then you can then appeal based on fatal error and have it dropped. As long as nobody shows up for trial on your behalf, then a trial has not actually taken place and the prosecutor can NOT amend/fix the ticket. If you or paralegal go to trial and there is a fatal error on the ticket, the prosecutor can amend/fix it on the spot and then they say "thanks for pointing out our error" and then go on with trial and you get charged and you cannot appeal the fatal error anymore because they were allowed to fix it at trial. Also if they amend/fix it at trial then there is no more "officer lied on the summons issue" either (because they fixed it). And if the officer did lie on the summons and you can prove it, that is a separate charge against the officer that does not have anything to do with your charge.
I am just making assumptions here that a "serious error" is a fatal error, which of course it might not be, but either way it is usually a bad idea to point out to the prosecutor problems with their case as you have now given them a heads up to what they need to either fix or address in their case.
Can you post a copy of your Offence Notice (with license plate blacked out and officers name blacked out and your personal information blacked out)?
Similar Topics
-
-
- Paralegal on File (how to terminate services with paralegal)
- Posted in General Talk
- By alexu on
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
- Careless driving Charge. No other car involved
- Posted in Careless Driving
- By maryjohn on
- Replies: 10
-
-
-
- filed 11b on 10 months and 26 days case, but lost the case
- Posted in Courts and Procedure
- By billses on
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
- Is my case really a case of "mis use parking permit"??
- Posted in Summon
- By stockt28 on
- Replies: 28
-
-
-
- Paralegal telling me to fight careless charge, should I?
- Posted in Careless Driving
- By lin on
- Replies: 5
-
-
-
-
- Explanation of "Motor Vehicle involved" on ticket
- Posted in General Talk
- By ignite on
- Replies: 5
-
-
-
- Speeding - Motor Vehicle Involved (N) Checked
- Posted in General Talk
- By Draiter on
- Replies: 3
-
-
-
- Motor Vehicle Involved (N) Checked - When to bring up.
- Posted in General Talk
- By Draiter on
- Replies: 10
-
-
-
-
- I was involved in a major accident and i don't know if I will be charged or not.
- Posted in Criminal Offences
- By zman2000 on
- Replies: 10
-
-
-
-
-
- Charge lowered by officer-Can JP charge you with the origina
- Posted in General Talk
- By pr1244883 on
- Replies: 5
-
-
-
-
- Case law regarding a justice or prosecutor changing a charge
- Posted in General Talk
- By Mr. Peabody on
- Replies: 7
-
-
-
- Defending Charge HTA 182 (2) Disobey a Sign A Case Study
- Posted in Failing to obey signs
- By stargezer17 on
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
- Careless Driving Charge - Case Law Presentation
- Posted in Careless Driving
- By Johnny b on
- Replies: 9
-
-
-
- Can a case be dismissed if Crown mailed to wrong addy then..
- Posted in Stunt Driving
- By funkyfro on
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
- Can't find case on CanLII
- Posted in Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- By PaulinCanada on
- Replies: 2
-
Featured Topics
Hand-held device placed securely in motor vehicle
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Exemption for pressing buttons
14.…
People are Driving Faster
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
136km/h in a 100km/hr, possible win?
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Ontario reintroducing Photo Radar/Speed Cameras?
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
Slowest of multiple targets, ticketed anyway....
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I was not going that…
Officer Alters Official Notes
Hi everyone,
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
Careless driving on a Bicycle - hit by a taxi driver
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
Is this 141(6) ?
Hello,
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
going 50 over the limit
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
An absolute nightmare
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…