Hey guys, filed for trial on a red light camera ticket. 11b doesn't apply because it's only 8 months from offence to trial. Next is filing for disclosure which I read somewhere a person said they'll only provide the photographs as disclosure. I can obviously argue incomplete disclosure if I want the officer's certification, etc. However, I'm wondering if it's a better defense to use: Waterloo v. Yan (http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/20 ... 32076.html) Ticketcombat and many others mentioned this case. Basically the court said a photograph is not admissible if it doesn't have the location on the actual photograph (section 32) of that link above. QUESTION IS: does anyone know if this argument is still valid or if it had ever worked in court?
Hey guys, filed for trial on a red light camera ticket.
11b doesn't apply because it's only 8 months from offence to trial.
Next is filing for disclosure which I read somewhere a person said they'll only provide the photographs as disclosure.
I can obviously argue incomplete disclosure if I want the officer's certification, etc.
However, I'm wondering if it's a better defense to use:
Ticketcombat and many others mentioned this case. Basically the court said a photograph is not admissible if it doesn't have the location on the actual photograph (section 32) of that link above.
QUESTION IS: does anyone know if this argument is still valid or if it had ever worked in court?
So none of your photographs have the date, location & time of day? What do you mean by officer's certification? Waterloo v. Yan has set the threshold for summoning the officer really high; the regulation doesn't require the disclosure of the officer's certification to secure a conviction. http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/e ... 0277_e.htm Another member here seems to have gotten something with his disclosure request: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com ... [quote]the disclosure package I received contained the following; a letter from the Registrar of Motor Vehicles attesting to the truthfulness of the records provided; certificate of ownership; enlarged prints of the photos included on the ticket.[/quote]If there aren't any fatal errors on the face of the ticket... you're much better off working on a guilty-plea statement. If you have financial difficulties, the courts can reduce the fine and set you up with a payment plan (ie. $10/mth) to help pay your fine.
So none of your photographs have the date, location & time of day?
What do you mean by officer's certification? Waterloo v. Yan has set the threshold for summoning the officer really high; the regulation doesn't require the disclosure of the officer's certification to secure a conviction. http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/e ... 0277_e.htm
Another member here seems to have gotten something with his disclosure request: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com ... [quote]the disclosure package I received contained the following; a letter from the Registrar of Motor Vehicles attesting to the truthfulness of the records provided; certificate of ownership; enlarged prints of the photos included on the ticket.[/quote]If there aren't any fatal errors on the face of the ticket... you're much better off working on a guilty-plea statement.
If you have financial difficulties, the courts can reduce the fine and set you up with a payment plan (ie. $10/mth) to help pay your fine.
The Yan decision still applies. However, I'd be quite surprised if there is still any Ontario jurisdiction who hasn't implemented those requirements on their photographs. Keep in mind that the "location" does not need to be set out by name, but rather is done by setting out the municipal codes as per the regulations. It is usually on Line 2 under the word "Code". The various municipal Codes are set out in this regulation. The letter enclosed with your photos will then provide you with specific information such as the exact intersection location. It is therefore quite hard to win on a red light camera case due to a defect. As iFly55 states, the threshold to require the officer to attend court is quite high, so you'll need to craft some very creative arguments to succeed in that area as well.
The Yan decision still applies. However, I'd be quite surprised if there is still any Ontario jurisdiction who hasn't implemented those requirements on their photographs.
Keep in mind that the "location" does not need to be set out by name, but rather is done by setting out the municipal codes as per the regulations. It is usually on Line 2 under the word "Code". The various municipal Codes are set out in this regulation. The letter enclosed with your photos will then provide you with specific information such as the exact intersection location. It is therefore quite hard to win on a red light camera case due to a defect.
As iFly55 states, the threshold to require the officer to attend court is quite high, so you'll need to craft some very creative arguments to succeed in that area as well.
Hi - I was looking for some advise for the above speeding ticket I got this afternoon. I was travelling in Newmarket on Davis drive making a left hand turn onto Bathurst. The office pulled me over for failing to stop on the yellow light. I told her I did not feel I could stop safetly, as it was…
I have a question. I was driving recently and was caught and charged under the distracted driving law as someone called me. It mentions I have 15 days to pay but I want to consider my options. I also read in the newspaper that the set fine of $155 will be going up March 18th.
A few months ago, IDKY I still remember it, but for some reason I do, I saw this guy do this one thing that I did not know what it would be classified as. I would of called it running an amber light, but idk. It was at this one intersection where it has a green arrow for both sides so they can turn…
I was recently driving Northbound on Kipling, just south of Eglington. As I went through the intersection a black, undercover police cruiser turned its lights on and pulled me over. I believed I had been going approx. 80 - 85.
Hi. I recently got a ticket for the above offence. I was driving a commercial rig, used for soil investigations. I was stopped on the shoulder of Mayfield Rd in Caledon, waiting for traffic control to be put in place (flagmen, signs, etc) so that I could commence my work. I was stopped beside…
This is a commercial from ENGLAND, was shown on Detroit news tonight. England crashes with texting has sky rocketed so the government launched this video.
I got pulled over on friday on the 401 and was given a careless driving ticket. It was the result of another driver calling in a complaint of my following too closely on the highway. Is this for real?? Do i have a good case to fight this charge? Apparently after the police gave me my ticked the…
Need some help from anyone please. Second driving offence in 9 years time. I was driving at night and apparently my headlight was out so i got stopped. Accidentally left my insurance card at home so I ended up getting 2 tickets. One was for improper headlights and the other for failing to have…
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?