Just as a further note an additional study was done in 2004 by the California Dept. of Motor Vehicles. Please note the quote from the conclusion section of that study:
AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS
OF IGNITION INTERLOCK IN CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN ACCORD WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 762
CHAPTER 756, 1998 ...
Search found 18 matches
- Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:58 pm
- Forum: Other Ontario Provincial Acts Related to Traffic
- Topic: Ignition Interlocking Device-Except from Bill 118
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3297
- Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:28 pm
- Forum: Other Ontario Provincial Acts Related to Traffic
- Topic: Ignition Interlocking Device-Except from Bill 118
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3297
Re: Ignition Interlocking Device-Except from Bill 118
I have an Ignition Interlocking Device in my vehicle. I recently received a warning letter from OPP stating that it was a warning that I was using a hand held device while driving and if it happened again I would be charged with Careless driving when I in fact I was using the Interlocking device as is required at various times while the vehicle is ...
- Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:49 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Just Received My Notice Of Suspension For Alcohol Dependence
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2658
Re: Just Received My Notice Of Suspension For Alcohol Depend
Exact same thing happened to me in exactly the same detail. I do feel there are some serious issues with this practice. If you have not been charged with an offense then the reasons for such a suspension and the practices of dealing with it should not happen. How could such a thing happen if this fell under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Note ...
