Search found 18 matches
- Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:31 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: bicycle fails to trip green light sensor coil
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3401
Re: bicycle fails to trip green light sensor coil
Section 144.(18) is particularly unforgiving. "Red light (18) Every driver approaching a traffic control signal showing a circular red indication and facing the indication shall stop his or her vehicle and shall not proceed until a green indication is shown." This problem is also experienced with some motorcycles when the sensitivity of the signal is set too high (or is that too low?) and will not trip the light to change. Running the red light on a motorcycle would be 3 demerit points. Dismounting and pushing the pedestrian button can be problematic instead of the fine and demerits....
- Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:06 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: bicycle fails to trip green light sensor coil
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3401
bicycle fails to trip green light sensor coil
I cannot find this topic, I am sure it has been discussed as it is the bane of motorcyclists and cyclists when the sensor coils fail to trip for a green light and it stays red forever. It seems there is no provision in section 144 to proceed through a red light that has failed to trip. We are discussing this situation on a bicycle forum on what to do, how legal is it to proceed, and if on a motorcycle would one have to defend a red light camera ticket? Can one proceed through the red light considering the light to be defective, even though this is not addressed in the law. If not what options ...
- Sun Feb 08, 2015 11:12 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Can I use a bicycle trailer as a motorcycle trailer?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2006
Can I use a bicycle trailer as a motorcycle trailer?
I will be getting a light duty bicycle utility box trailer to pull behind my bicycle, and would like to know if I could use the same trailer for my motor scooter. First, I would need to add a red light and a licence plate light, and reflectors, and of course legally requires mudguards. So there are two main questions. 1. How difficult would it be to get a licence plate? I cannot find any regulations as to what a trailer should be. Do I declare is as home built as it might not have a serial number? 2. It will have the two methods, basically a bracket and pin, with a tether. However it does not ...
- Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:34 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Improper Licence-dirtbike?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4051
Re: Improper Licence-dirtbike?
Under the HTA a
in other words all public roads, no matter who maintains them, municipalities, etc., not just Ontario."highway" includes a common and public highway, street, avenue, parkway, driveway, square, place, bridge, viaduct or trestle, any part of which is intended for or used by the general public for the passage of vehicles and includes the area between the lateral property lines thereof;
- Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:13 am
- Forum: Red Light Camera Ticket
- Topic: Running Red Light on Bicycle. Bicycle = Motorized Vehicle?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4140
Re: Running Red Light on Bicycle. Bicycle = Motorized Vehicl
There should be a check box on the ticket saying yes/no motor vehicle involved , the box should be checked no if bicycle. If it not you must get it corrected.
A power-assisted bicycle has a battery and an electric motor and under the HTA is a bicycle.
A power-assisted bicycle has a battery and an electric motor and under the HTA is a bicycle.
- Wed Nov 13, 2013 12:27 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Licence suspension for non payment of bicycle fines?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1539
Re: Licence suspension for non payment of bicycle fines?
Thankyou.
Just to clarify is the licence suspension also for unpaid municipal bylaw fines, for example riding your bicycle on the sidewalk which is a municipal bylaw offence; or is licence suspension only for HTA offences while on a bicycle, for example disobeying a stop sign, which is an HTA offence?
Just to clarify is the licence suspension also for unpaid municipal bylaw fines, for example riding your bicycle on the sidewalk which is a municipal bylaw offence; or is licence suspension only for HTA offences while on a bicycle, for example disobeying a stop sign, which is an HTA offence?
- Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:28 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Licence suspension for non payment of bicycle fines?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1539
Licence suspension for non payment of bicycle fines?
Section 47 of the HTA says your licence will be suspended for non-payment of fines. If you have a drivers licence, will your licence be suspended for fines received riding a bicycle and not paid?. Does this include all fines, including municipal bylaw fines and HTA fines. One woman told me her young son got a ticket for a bicycle offence, did not tell her and did not pay the fine. She was told they issued a temporary licence to her son, then suspended it. Will this suspended licence now hang around until the son goes to get a real drivers licence, and have to get the temporary licence un-suspe...
- Sun Sep 29, 2013 1:19 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Unpaid bicycle fines and licence supension
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1512
Unpaid bicycle fines and licence supension
I am trying to find out where it is written that unpaid fines will result in a suspended licence. I am familiar with the HTA but not the section regarding unpaid fines suspending your drivers licence. The main HTA body states a permit will not be renewed, I assume that is for the licence plate, legislation about unpaid fines must be elsewhere. The question has arisen, if you have unpaid fines from a HTA infraction on a bicycle, does the same rules apply and you can have your drivers licence suspended? I add my own question would this affect your permit sticker renewal for your plates as well? ...
- Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:40 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: impeding the flow of traffic on a highway, what is section?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7647
impeding the flow of traffic on a highway, what is section?
I wish to refute a statement.. The rules of the road state that a cyclist is entitled to use a road but cannot obstruct the flow at speed limit for lengthy periods of time. It also says that a vehicle must give a bicycle 1meter of room when passing. I know there is no such 1 metre rule in Ontario. I am familiar with what sections govern the responsibilities of a slower vehicle being passed and the responsibilities of the overtaking vehicle. Sections 148. I also know that bicycles must keep to the right where practicable (whatever that means). Section 147 However my difficulty is finding the se...
- Fri Dec 02, 2011 3:54 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: 103.1 (2) on a Power-Assisted Bicycle
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3639
Re: 103.1 (2) on a Power-Assisted Bicycle
Annoying as the conduct of the officer was, if he was ticketed with not wearing a helmet, if memory serves me correctly, it is only an $85 plus costs fine, topping out at somewhere around $105, while not chicken feed, might be chalked up to being an expensive lesson. There are no implications about it affecting his dirver's license, or I am assuming would not affect automobile insurance or garner any points. Sometimes we are just guilty of an offense and have to pay the piper. I fixate on the walking of the bike because if that is true, then he is a pedestrian and does not need a helmet. If he...
- Sat Nov 26, 2011 2:56 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: 103.1 (2) on a Power-Assisted Bicycle
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3639
Re: 103.1 (2) on a Power-Assisted Bicycle
I am not that familiar with Charter law, but a lot of the ruling seem to be quite liberal in their interpretations. However this is a side issue to the original helmet charge, and largely irrelevent. He was a pedestrian walking his bike at the time of the ticket, he was not observed riding with no helmet. I do not know at what age children can be charged with failure to wear a helmet, but their parents can be charged with section 104 (2.2) allowing them to ride with no helmet, therefor laws were being broken in the presence of the officer as she was searching for a charge. The question also sh...
- Thu Nov 24, 2011 5:20 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: 103.1 (2) on a Power-Assisted Bicycle
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3639
Re: 103.1 (2) on a Power-Assisted Bicycle
I agree ignorance of the law is no excuse. You were misinformed. You have to be 16+ and everyone must wear either a bicycle helmet or motorcycle helmet while operating a power-assisted bicycle. As you were walking the bicycle the statute does not apply. Some people might be confusing this with care and control which if you were impaired you could be charged, but that is not this statute, clearly you have to be riding ["ride on, drive or operate"] the ebike in this statute. When walking a bicycle you are a pedestrian, according to MTO publication with reference to section 179 http://w...
- Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:20 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: E-Bikes and the HTA
- Replies: 30
- Views: 12473
Re: E-Bikes and the HTA
I have looked at the Highway Traffic Act and the original poster could have been charged with three different sections of the HTA. The statement that removing the pedals reclassifies the ebike into an motor vehicle are false and I will explain why. First of all, the ebiker without pedals should have been charged with HTA section 103.1 (1) 103.1 (1) Every power-assisted bicycle shall have the prescribed equipment and conform to the prescribed requirements and standards. 2009, c. 5, s. 35. I cannot find the set fines for this section of the HTA and am not sure what 2009, c. 5, s. 35 means. . Alt...
- Sat Aug 13, 2011 9:51 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Need Advice on Bicycle-Car Collision
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2374
Re: Need Advice on Bicycle-Car Collision
Laws since 1998 amalagamtion are available online. The others I do not know, I think you would have to call City Hall to find out, however I suspect they would be available at any Toronto library. What you are looking for is Toronto bylaw 1992-0032 which is how they have been renamed YYYY-####. See the link here for title and other info you need in your search. Of course you have to find the correct section amongst the 333 pages of the document entitled UNIFORM TRAFFIC BY-LAW. http://app.toronto.ca/BLSRWEB_Public/BylawDetails.do?bylawId=13755 I have not read the full version of the law, but it...
- Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:30 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: S. 62 (7) Headlight Modified = yellow DRL?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7430
Re: S. 62 (7) Headlight Modified = yellow DRL?
Section 62 (1) requires two lights on the front of the vehicle, and for them to be white or amber, which is what you have. Obviously section 62 (7) must mean any other colour than the required amber. Saying they have to be amber, and then saying they cannot be amber does not make sense, and it clearly says so here Exception (7.1) Clause (7) (a) does not apply if the lamps are of the prescribed type or meet the prescribed standards. 2002, c. 18, Sched. P, s. 19 (1). Your lights are of the prescribed type e.g. white or amber, thus clause 7 (a) does not apply. At least that is how I read this sec...