hmm interesting!

in my first request I did specifically ask for "a full copy of the police officers notes on the day of the alleged offence", but you think I'm best off asking specifically for testing times anyways?

I've had a read around notations already. My thinking is that because they didn't provide it to me, they can't use his day book as evidence so as of right now there is no written evidence of any testing at all.

Would I be wise to request additional notes, which could contain evidence against me?

received my disclosure today. http://i.snag.gy/TF9M0.jpg this is ALL I got in terms of notes. No record of calibration before or after. my question is, should I send a second request for the officer's notes from the day? or can I run with this and press the point that he didn't test the unit before ...

exactly in your shoes. I was one of the chumps nabbed on Friday :( 2.5 hr drive from hamilton to Napanee! I mailed the notice of trial today, and will get disclosure- I'm thinking training records, manual, officer notes (particularly paying attention to if he tested AFTER tagging me with the laser)....

they got back to me and said they can email disclosure, indeed!

is it still required under case law that there is documentation that the unit was tested after being pulled over? you'd think the officer would just say he did test the unit afterwards and that would be the end of it then, even though the notes did not mention any testing afterwards?

does anyone else have any info in this? I see some posts referring to mailed disclosures..