Ontario Highway Traffic Act

The quoted section would actually be referring to the termination of a school safety zone, not the actual highway itself. Its basically saying when the school safety zone ends, you need to post a new sign with the (presumably) higher limit.
You are wrong here. When the school zone or community safety zone continues after the next intersection ...

Whether the sign must be there or not is not an issue now. The issue in the trial was that the only supportive evidence from the officer for my conviction was the 70 speed limit sign.The officer testifies there is a speed limit sign posted. I did prove there is no sign posted and never been posted before . The senior traffic engineers can proove ...

R.R.O. 1990, REGULATION 615
"(6) A speed limit sign as prescribed in section 1 shall be erected at the termination of the designated portion of the highway, except that the maximum speed shown thereon shall be the appropriate speed limit for the adjoining portion of the highway. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 615, s. 5 (6)."
Termination of the highway is every ...

Lesson 1: The only chance to win is the officer no show or Motion for 11b if you have to wait more than a year for the trial( i did won one and was easy-may be i was lucky)
Lesson 2: The Provincial offenses court is not a court where you can get Justice.They will get you convicted no matter
Lesson 3: The Justice of Piece is actually acting as a ...

It is getting interesting here. I was convicted on the first trial . i filed an appeal and i won it. The Judge desision was that my right were violated and ordered a new trial. Went on the new trial , but no trial was held because of no time. I did request to proceed with the trial , but the Judge refused. New date was scheduled and now this is ...

Appeal won! Grounds for appeal improper ruling for submitting evidence in trial.

I got a disclosure in form of a printout. The officer doesn't have hand written notes. He made his notes on the laptop.
There is no copy of his notes recorded elsewhere, so only the officer has control over it. Is this acceptable in a court and how that can be proved to be authentic and not modified at a later time? In the Evidence Act is shown ...

I just won my case using 11b. It was quite easy. Just file it in time an get all the party stamp the application.
The funny thing in the court was the prosecutor said they never received it but their stamp was on the first page.
Also i sent 2 requests for disclosure and i did not get any. In the court the prosecutor send the officer to bring me his ...

I think you misunderstood the section you've quoted. It's referring to the fact that when there is a change in the speed limit (i.e. a 80 drops down to a 50 zone), the speed limit sign should have the word "BEGINS" affixed below it. The requirement for where and how often speed limit signs need to be posted is directly above that section (600 or ...

Here guys

http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_900615_e.htm#BK0

3. (1) The commencement of the part of a highway for which a maximum rate of speed is prescribed shall be indicated by a speed limit sign accompanied immediately below by a sign bearing the markings and having the dimensions as illustrated in the following Figure ...

I know what you're saying, but the limit would be whatever is posted on the highway, even if there is no sign present where you turned on. I can think of a few highways near where I live which have limits lower then 80, yet the speed isn't posted at the intersections where motorists enter the highway.

OK here is the Ontario Traffic Manual .
http ...

Fight it!
You are going to have a record anyway.$10 or $20 up and down doesn't make difference for the insurance purposes .The points are the last thing to worry about.
At least you have a chance if the cop doesn't show up.

That was in Durham. Also there was another strange thing i notice in the court room.One of the officers called as a witness was with the uniform and all the guns and ammunition with him. He was in the room when the prosecutor asked the JP to let him stay like that because he did not have time to dress otherwise or something like that. There is no ...

Thanks guys!
I know it is not worth the hassle to appeal but the trial was a real farce. At one point there was no difference between the JP and the Prosecutor.
Both of them were going to eat me alive. As for the duty of the JP to assist me in a way so i can defend my self and there is a case law and is a good reason for appeal.Here is the link to ...

I had a trial and found guilty, but the trial seemed to go wrong since the beginning.
The JP asked me if i am intending to take the stand- I said NO.
I asked how to submit my evidence-documents and photos.
JP said-i have to take the stand if i want to submit evidence.(Now i am finding this is wrong-i could introduce my evidence during cross ...