I got the disclosure including the LIDAR manual, and also the officer notes stated that it was tested 2 hours before he used it on my speed.
Is this enough? I mean the court will take the officer hand writing notes for grants? why not questioning an evidence showing he really tested on same time?
If the answer is yes, do you think I should accept the settlement from Prosecutor who offered me to accept dropping the charges to speed 149 k/m, and removing the stunt driving charge?
Search found 2 matches
- Sat Nov 30, 2024 7:20 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Court Doesn't agree to disclose the LIDAR electronic output or any calibration report
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2799
- Fri Nov 01, 2024 12:19 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Court Doesn't agree to disclose the LIDAR electronic output or any calibration report
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2799
Court Doesn't agree to disclose the LIDAR electronic output or any calibration report
Hello everyone,
I’m facing a stunt driving charge for going 162 km/h in a 100 km/h zone in Ontario. In preparing my defense, I requested the LIDAR device’s electronic output and calibration records, but the judge denied it, stating I would only receive the officer’s notes and the LIDAR manual. My hearing hasn’t occurred yet. Has anyone encountered a similar issue? Is it normal for such evidence requests to be denied, and does anyone have advice for defending this?
I’m facing a stunt driving charge for going 162 km/h in a 100 km/h zone in Ontario. In preparing my defense, I requested the LIDAR device’s electronic output and calibration records, but the judge denied it, stating I would only receive the officer’s notes and the LIDAR manual. My hearing hasn’t occurred yet. Has anyone encountered a similar issue? Is it normal for such evidence requests to be denied, and does anyone have advice for defending this?
