Ontario Highway Traffic Act

A motor assisted bicycle is a motor vehicle for purposes of the HTA.

If you cannot find an insurance company to insure a motor assisted bicycle it is still a motor vehicle for purposes of the HTA and cannot be ridden on a highway without insurance.

Since a motor assisted bicycle is a motor vehicle, it also appears it requires a current ...

If your vehicle is stolen and then found and impounded, s. 172 (9) and (15) require you as the owner to pay towing and storage fees before your stolen property will be returned to you.

Should you refuse refuse to pay, the impound facility who is now in possession of your stolen property is entitled to sell your stolen property.

Have you ever ...

My God this province is corrupt. On a first read of certain sections I find many problems. Heres a few more.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal refuses to hear cases relating to licence suspensions under s. 48 or s. 172.

However, HTA 50.(1) and Licence Tribunal Act s. 3.(1) requires them to hear such cases yet without justification the Tribunal ...

There is a massive scam going on at the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT).

If you drivers licence has been suspended under HTA s. 48.3 and the Tribunal has refused to reinstate your licence you have been scammed by the government.

Most hearings at the Tribunal are heard long before the ordinary court hearing is held that deals with the offence you ...

Thanks TC. Not sure how much Ill be able to post though. If you ever handle one of these cases please, please make these arguments.

I was happy to see the BC Motor Vehicle case, Kanda case, and Sault Saint Marie cases cited in the decisions. I was the first (at least on here) to use those cases in regards to proving s. 172 is bogus.

Thanks for ...

Each of the following is a separate offence under the stunt definition. The court claims its a strict liability offence, meaning you have a due diligence defence.

How can one have a due diligence excuse for driving a motor vehicle with a person in the trunk?

How could it be unintentional?

How can one have a due diligence excuse for driving a ...

I'm reading the second case now.

The justice said:

Thirdly, there is the issue of penalty. The penalties are far reaching and the consequences appear to be severe. They are however not extreme or outside the parameters of the Highway Traffic Act when compared to other offences such as Driving while Suspended or Driving without Insurance ...

Hi everyone. How are you?

I couldn't remember my email address or password so I had to create a new account.

Just in the process of reading the first case TC posted and found many errors.

I already proved last September that s. 172 is an absolute liability offence and also contains mens rea offences.

The judge claims all of s. 172 is strict ...