Search found 32 matches

by Keroba
Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:54 am
Forum: Courts and Procedure
Topic: Speeding - what should the set fine and total payable be?
Replies: 4
Views: 3793

Re: Speeding - what should the set fine and total payable be

Ok, so the ticket is right if it shows $75 as the set fine, with a total payable of $95? 20 x $3.75 = $75 set fine + $15 VFS + $5 service cost = $95 total payable If the HTA table was used, it would be: 20 x $4.50 = $90 set fine + $20 VFS + $5 service cost = $115 total payable I was thinking a Londo...
by Keroba
Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:40 pm
Forum: Courts and Procedure
Topic: Speeding - what should the set fine and total payable be?
Replies: 4
Views: 3793

Speeding - what should the set fine and total payable be?

Hi, A friend got a ticket Jan. 9th of this year for doing 110 kph in a 90 kph zone, so 20 over. What should the set fine and total payable read? It's confusing to me, as the prescribed fine under HTA s.128 is different than the set fine enumerated by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice...
by Keroba
Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:56 am
Forum: Courts and Procedure
Topic: My successful 11b carter motion
Replies: 20
Views: 16455

The prosecution does have grounds to bring you back to court for a retrial. The charges have been stayed, and there is no statue of limitations for them to challenge you or revise the stayed decision. When you file a charter motion to get the charges stayed.. It basically means you want the charge ...
by Keroba
Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:50 pm
Forum: Following too closely
Topic: My day in court fighting a FTC ticket
Replies: 1
Views: 3969

My day in court fighting a FTC ticket

Court was for 9 am … after the prosecutor had talked to everyone that was there, it was near 9:45! I would guess there were 25 people there, and only I asked for a trial (well, there was another, but she soon took a plea). The prosecutor at first offered to swap the FTC for an "unsa...
by Keroba
Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:25 am
Forum: Courts and Procedure
Topic: R vs White Defence
Replies: 13
Views: 3707

I thought that a R. v. White exclusion was only allowable in a criminal offence context? See Toronto v. Baillie, 2007 ONCJ 244 . J.P. Quon did a pretty comprehensive overview of the "principle against self-incrimination" caselaw to that point, including R. v. White . It says that in a regu...
by Keroba
Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:02 am
Forum: Courts and Procedure
Topic: 13 months = stay of charges?
Replies: 11
Views: 3290

Keroba, I'm still confused. What I would like to do right now is send a letter to the court office requesting that they "speed up" the trial date. This way I'm proving that I would like this solved ASAP just in case the judge questions my 11(b) request. The 11(b) forms willl be submitted ...
by Keroba
Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:28 pm
Forum: Courts and Procedure
Topic: 13 months = stay of charges?
Replies: 11
Views: 3290

Is this disclosure request form ok? http://respect.to/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=LegalInfo.RequestForDisclosureForm As for the 4F template, that's when I submit a request for stay of charges (11(b)), at least two weeks before the trial date, right? Thanks! As for the disclosure form, looks fine to me. I wou...
by Keroba
Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:16 pm
Forum: Courts and Procedure
Topic: List of errors that are fatal in a POA ss. 9/9.1 setting
Replies: 5
Views: 3457

Simon Borys wrote:Not sure but I'm interested to hear what comes of this.
For anyone new to this thread, this is how it played out.
by Keroba
Fri Aug 13, 2010 3:51 pm
Forum: Courts and Procedure
Topic: 13 months = stay of charges?
Replies: 11
Views: 3290

You can search or goto a paralegal to draft your File form 4F, "Notice of Constituional Question" I believe it is. Your choice. Hi Reflections, I would like to send a letter to the court office saying that I haven't received the notification yet and requesting if they could "speed up...
by Keroba
Fri Aug 13, 2010 7:22 am
Forum: Following too closely
Topic: Following too closely ticket with contact
Replies: 12
Views: 8384

R. v. Reiber, 2007 ONCJ 343 , para 15: In R v Smith, [2002] OJ No 3270, Halikowski J, sitting as a POA appellate court accepted the necessity of having all of the essential elements of the included offence as part of the original offence. In that decision, the court at paragraph 8 stated: Mr. Smith...
by Keroba
Thu Aug 12, 2010 3:04 pm
Forum: Courts and Procedure
Topic: 13 months = stay of charges?
Replies: 11
Views: 3290

Re: 13 months = stay of charges?

I got this ticket in November of 2009 and requested a trial date. I haven't receiving any notification yet. It's been almost 10 months. So today I visited the court office and the lady searched the system. She says there's a date for the trial, end of December of 2010. That's going to be 13 months....
by Keroba
Thu Aug 12, 2010 2:28 pm
Forum: Courts and Procedure
Topic: My experience with a s.135 POA appeal
Replies: 11
Views: 5917

My experience with a s.135 POA appeal

My experience with a s.135 POA appeal First, the short strokes for those that like to skim: 1. Got a ticket for Fail to Have Insurance Card 2. Total payable for that should be $65 ($50 set fine + $10 victim fine s/c + $5 costs for servicing of ticket), it was written as $60 3. Seeing this, I delibe...
by Keroba
Fri Jul 23, 2010 6:39 pm
Forum: Following too closely
Topic: Following too closely ticket with contact
Replies: 12
Views: 8384

If you are charged with FTC, and it's clear from the evidence that really you were just driving carelessly, then there's no way they can convict on FTC, and no way that they can substitute a Careless Driving charge for the FTC (definitely no way after 6 mos from the offence date). If you are charged...
by Keroba
Wed May 05, 2010 2:44 am
Forum: General Talk
Topic: Fatal Error on the Ticket
Replies: 22
Views: 13277

what if the speed limit is posted at 70km but the ticket said 60km? would the ticket be wrong? Yes the ticket is wrong, but you will have to prove it. how would i prove this with pictures? video? so who needs to take the pictures? can it be myself? if i can prove it is wrong do i win the case? The ...
by Keroba
Tue May 04, 2010 7:23 pm
Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
Topic: Sppeeding Ticket Error!
Replies: 4
Views: 1439

Respectfully disagree........ This mistake does not set out proper offence and the certificate should be quashed rather than amended. Personally, I would let this ticket go FTR (fail to respond) and file an appeal to get this matter quashed. Agreed. Any JP looking at this should quash it right away...

Go to advanced search