Ontario Highway Traffic Act

What elements are to be proven in court by the JP?
As mentioned in my last post

officer zoomed past me, and in the video he observed me only for 3 seconds. In 3 seconds you can zoom by and not even make out what they are doing.

Heres what the dash cam showed


11:22: 41 seconds cop passes me
11:22:43 STOPPED
BEYOND ME, RIGHT BESIDE THE CAR IN ...

and from my last post
i shared an example of a phone on a lap= resting on a surface
i never said it was really on my lap

only scenarios and examples.

ill update the forum, once I go to trial.

and yes I have a way of defence
how can the officer prove what was on my lap (first of all he couldnt see my lap, he was a distance, he would have to be really close to my car, and lean over to see.

An elevated cab is a vague statement, as elevated means that my seat was so high that he saw an object on ...

sorry can you clarify.

the officer wrote in his report
that my phone was on my lap, and hands on phone

when he pulled me over

i asked me the reason for your stop?

he said, i saw you using your phone, touching the phone, holding the phone.

he drove past me, for a mere 3 seconds he made 4 judgments (touching, holding, using, and phone being on ...

This is the disclosure i received in exact working
in Wb lane on lawrence ave in lane 3
defendant is in l2 west bound on lawrence ave
looking for distracted driving .. vehicles are stopped in l2
drive past defendant.. head is down... hands on phone on lap
light turns green approx 5 secs before moving

defendant still looking down does not see ...