It is valid. The actual speed is not part of the short wording for a stunt offence.

There’s no requirement to lock the device at the highest speed obtained. It’s quite common to clear a locked speed to see if someone is speeding up or slowing down. There’s also no requirement to show you the speed displayed on the device.

I'm just curious, where was the alleged offence, and what type of speed measuring device was used. Some of the disclosure doesn't make sense for an officer written ticket.

No. The registered owner is issued the ticket. Identification of the driver isn’t necessary.

https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2 ... pletePos=7

Region of York v McGuigan

And it’s binding on lower courts. The only possibility of turning this one over would be taking a similar case to the Ontario Court of Appeal.

There seems to be a serious flaw in the process that the officer has followed. Under section 172(5) it states that the if the officer believes on rpg that a person has driven in contravention of subsection 1, the officer shall request that the person surrender their licence and SHALL detain the moto...

In order for you to proceed wth an O’Connor application, you’re likely to spend several days in court, even before you see a trial if that’s where you end up.

Just so you’re aware. A 2017 OCA case R v Davis, allows the officer to modify the ticket after service in most cases.

You can’t score if you don’t shoot the puck! If you have time to go to the meeting and don’t have any convictions, they may reduce it further if you’re apologetic and don’t go in with a chip on your shoulder. If they don’t offer you anything further , you can simply offer to pay it. If y...

On the first page of the notes, last line, arrow pointing down usually means you were slowing 150 down to 149. Technically stunt driving at 150. The officer decided to charge you at 149. If you take this to trial and the officer testifies that you were driving 150, the prosecutor will probably amend...

Disclosure is the responsibility of the prosecutor. The police wont give you the manual.

That book is not used in training officers on the use of radar in Ontario. Most officers have probably never even heard of it. Depending on its publication date, it may even be very outdated.

As per this case: https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2 ... sc436.html

There is no longer a requirement to provide any portion of the manual.

This thread is over a year old. Please do not post to outdated threads.

You’re not likely to get a lot of assistance with case law from Alberta. We are much more familiar with Ontario case law here.
For example, in Ontario the manual does not have to be produced nor an operator certificate.

This post is over six years old. Do not post to threads more than 30 days old unless you’re the OP. Please read the forum rules prior to posting again.