NOTE: I didn't post this in the "Failure to Remain" section, because I haven't been charged with anything, and this happened on private property. Some years ago, I was backing one of my parents' vehicles out of their garage and bumped into another person's vehicle that was behind me, which was sitting in my parents' driveway. After hitting the vehicle, I got out to look for damage and I don't remember seeing anything. I decided not to tell anyone what happened. However, from what I've read, even a slight "tap" on a bumper can cause internal damage, which, among other potential effects, may render the bumper less effective in a future accident. Also, I think with any kind of damage involving metal (which I think there might have been, if there was internal damage), there is also the possibility of rust forming. As such, I would like to inform whoever it was, so that he can get his vehicle checked out. Since I don't remember whose vehicle it was, I am considering sending emails to various people, hoping that one of them is the owner. Let's say that one of these people finds damage and reports it to his insurance company. My question is: would the consequence to my parents' insurance simply be an increase in rates or could their plan be cancelled? If an increase in rates, would it be something astronomical? I am thinking that if my parents' insurance policy requires them to report all accidents, and this accident was technically a "failure to stop", then isn't that serious enough for there to be serious consequences to my parents' insurance? Or, would the insurance company take into consideration the fact that I'm not actually convicted of anything and that my parents had no knowledge of the event and, therefore, not impose very serious consequences? To provide some context on my parents' current insurance, I think they have a very good rating and I think their rates are fairly low right now. I used to be listed as an occasional driver, including at the time this event occurred, but I live in an apartment now, and therefore I barely use the car and am not listed as a driver on the policy any longer.
NOTE: I didn't post this in the "Failure to Remain" section, because I haven't been charged with anything, and this happened on private property.
Some years ago, I was backing one of my parents' vehicles out of their garage and bumped into another person's vehicle that was behind me, which was sitting in my parents' driveway.
After hitting the vehicle, I got out to look for damage and I don't remember seeing anything. I decided not to tell anyone what happened.
However, from what I've read, even a slight "tap" on a bumper can cause internal damage, which, among other potential effects, may render the bumper less effective in a future accident. Also, I think with any kind of damage involving metal (which I think there might have been, if there was internal damage), there is also the possibility of rust forming.
As such, I would like to inform whoever it was, so that he can get his vehicle checked out.
Since I don't remember whose vehicle it was, I am considering sending emails to various people, hoping that one of them is the owner.
Let's say that one of these people finds damage and reports it to his insurance company. My question is: would the consequence to my parents' insurance simply be an increase in rates or could their plan be cancelled? If an increase in rates, would it be something astronomical?
I am thinking that if my parents' insurance policy requires them to report all accidents, and this accident was technically a "failure to stop", then isn't that serious enough for there to be serious consequences to my parents' insurance? Or, would the insurance company take into consideration the fact that I'm not actually convicted of anything and that my parents had no knowledge of the event and, therefore, not impose very serious consequences?
To provide some context on my parents' current insurance, I think they have a very good rating and I think their rates are fairly low right now. I used to be listed as an occasional driver, including at the time this event occurred, but I live in an apartment now, and therefore I barely use the car and am not listed as a driver on the policy any longer.
Im kinda lost. So the person you hit some years ago never filed a claim with you and now you want to tell them because your worried their car is going to rust or break down soon? If its been some years ...why not just move on? I admire the good samaritan stuff, but like thats something you should have done right away. like why wait "some years" to tell them, the damage is long done.
Im kinda lost. So the person you hit some years ago never filed a claim with you and now you want to tell them because your worried their car is going to rust or break down soon? If its been some years ...why not just move on?
I admire the good samaritan stuff, but like thats something you should have done right away. like why wait "some years" to tell them, the damage is long done.
Yeah, in this case I'd probably let it go. Not that I'm supporting any form of "hit and run," but realistically, this is WAY too late to do anything, and trying to fix this now is going to cause more problems than it will solve.
Yeah, in this case I'd probably let it go. Not that I'm supporting any form of "hit and run," but realistically, this is WAY too late to do anything, and trying to fix this now is going to cause more problems than it will solve.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
If this is several years old and nobody has said anything by now, I really wouldn't worry about it. What ever damage may have been done I'm sure has long since been dealt with. Anyway even if you somehow manage to find the owner of the car, and if that person finds damage, that person will still not be able to make an insurance claim. The accident happened so long ago that there will be no way to prove that any damage found resulted from you hitting the car as so many things could have happened to that car between then and now. Also I'm sure the time limit set out in the insurance contract for the owner to file a claim has long since expired. If I were in your position I would probably just let it go and move on with life worry free.
If this is several years old and nobody has said anything by now, I really wouldn't worry about it. What ever damage may have been done I'm sure has long since been dealt with. Anyway even if you somehow manage to find the owner of the car, and if that person finds damage, that person will still not be able to make an insurance claim. The accident happened so long ago that there will be no way to prove that any damage found resulted from you hitting the car as so many things could have happened to that car between then and now. Also I'm sure the time limit set out in the insurance contract for the owner to file a claim has long since expired. If I were in your position I would probably just let it go and move on with life worry free.
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…