There isn't really a off-topic thread or polling feature on these forums, but I want to pose this question anyways. In regards to speeding, what do commuters think about speeding on a highway/expressway versus in a school zone, while kids are getting out? Based on my interruption of the speeding section, of the Ontario highway traffic act; it seems to be very cut and dry that the school zone is not as serious. And that harsher penalties should be handed out on places like expressways or highways. Code: Select all Penalty (14) Every person who contravenes this section or any by-law or regulation made under this section is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable, where the rate of speed at which the motor vehicle was driven, (a) is less than 20 kilometres per hour over the speed limit, to a fine of $3 for each kilometre per hour that the motor vehicle was driven over the speed limit; (b) is 20 kilometres per hour or more but less than 30 kilometres per hour over the speed limit, to a fine of $4.50 for each kilometre per hour that the motor vehicle was driven over the speed limit; (c) is 30 kilometres per hour or more but less than 50 kilometres per hour over the speed limit, to a fine of $7 for each kilometre per hour that the motor vehicle was driven over the speed limit; and (d) is 50 kilometres per hour or more over the speed limit, to a fine of $9.75 for each kilometre per hour that the motor vehicle was driven over the speed limit. 2005, c. 26, Sched. A, s. 17 (7). This is based on a simple theory that Quebec uses for speeding tickets. Each zone is different and speed penalties should be measured by a sliding scale not by actual kilometer readings. We seem to think that 70 in a safe 50 zone is normal, but 130 in a 100 zone isn't. In reality, both of these speeds would be equivalent under the assumption that going 30% over, is just as dangerous in both locations with clear and dry roads.
There isn't really a off-topic thread or polling feature on these forums, but I want to pose this question anyways. In regards to speeding, what do commuters think about speeding on a highway/expressway versus in a school zone, while kids are getting out?
Based on my interruption of the speeding section, of the Ontario highway traffic act; it seems to be very cut and dry that the school zone is not as serious. And that harsher penalties should be handed out on places like expressways or highways.
Penalty
(14) Every person who contravenes this section or any by-law or regulation made under this section is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable, where the rate of speed at which the motor vehicle was driven,
(a) is less than 20 kilometres per hour over the speed limit, to a fine of $3 for each kilometre per hour that the motor vehicle was driven over the speed limit;
(b) is 20 kilometres per hour or more but less than 30 kilometres per hour over the speed limit, to a fine of $4.50 for each kilometre per hour that the motor vehicle was driven over the speed limit;
(c) is 30 kilometres per hour or more but less than 50 kilometres per hour over the speed limit, to a fine of $7 for each kilometre per hour that the motor vehicle was driven over the speed limit; and
(d) is 50 kilometres per hour or more over the speed limit, to a fine of $9.75 for each kilometre per hour that the motor vehicle was driven over the speed limit. 2005, c. 26, Sched. A, s. 17 (7).
This is based on a simple theory that Quebec uses for speeding tickets. Each zone is different and speed penalties should be measured by a sliding scale not by actual kilometer readings. We seem to think that 70 in a safe 50 zone is normal, but 130 in a 100 zone isn't. In reality, both of these speeds would be equivalent under the assumption that going 30% over, is just as dangerous in both locations with clear and dry roads.
A number of municipalities have established by-laws for "community safety zones", which municipalities are able to do under the Highway Traffic Act. These community safety zones can be used on roads near schools (or other community areas) to help promote safety. Section 214 (community safety zones) of the Highway Traffic Act generally doubles the fines for traffic offences committed in community safety zones, including speeding. So, I wouldn't necessarily say the Highway Traffic Act is set out that school zones are not as serious. Highway driving makes it easier for drivers to speed because it's open and the difference between 100km/h and 120km/h doesn't seem as significant as 40km/h and 60km/h. In some European countries, there is no speed limit on highways and it's actually been shown to be safer with reduced number of collisions (they're also testing out higher speed limits [120km/h] in British Columbia, and Ontario is watching closely at the BC results) Meanwhile, on city streets, there's stop lights and stop signs, there's traffic, there's pedestrians. So I would argue that it's more dangerous to speed on city streets, especially school zones, and hence the placement of community safety zones.
A number of municipalities have established by-laws for "community safety zones", which municipalities are able to do under the Highway Traffic Act. These community safety zones can be used on roads near schools (or other community areas) to help promote safety.
Section 214 (community safety zones) of the Highway Traffic Act generally doubles the fines for traffic offences committed in community safety zones, including speeding.
So, I wouldn't necessarily say the Highway Traffic Act is set out that school zones are not as serious.
Highway driving makes it easier for drivers to speed because it's open and the difference between 100km/h and 120km/h doesn't seem as significant as 40km/h and 60km/h. In some European countries, there is no speed limit on highways and it's actually been shown to be safer with reduced number of collisions (they're also testing out higher speed limits [120km/h] in British Columbia, and Ontario is watching closely at the BC results)
Meanwhile, on city streets, there's stop lights and stop signs, there's traffic, there's pedestrians.
So I would argue that it's more dangerous to speed on city streets, especially school zones, and hence the placement of community safety zones.
In the USA they need to do engineering studies on all roads to determine what a "safe" speed is. In Canada it's just an arbitrary number and going 1 over means you are guilty and the prosecution/police do not have to prove that the speed you were going was somehow unsafe, even though they continually regurgitate how it is all about safety. In 2013 (newest data I can find), the OPP alone got 1,184,219 convictions of which 654,036 were speeding convictions, so speeding accounts for more than 50% of charges and therefore should be spelled $$$peeding. http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/public ... t-2013.pdf
In the USA they need to do engineering studies on all roads to determine what a "safe" speed is. In Canada it's just an arbitrary number and going 1 over means you are guilty and the prosecution/police do not have to prove that the speed you were going was somehow unsafe, even though they continually regurgitate how it is all about safety.
In 2013 (newest data I can find), the OPP alone got 1,184,219 convictions of which 654,036 were speeding convictions, so speeding accounts for more than 50% of charges and therefore should be spelled $$$peeding.
Yes because everyone should be able to go any speed they want and it's only an issue when they hit someone. Argue the unnecessary enforcement in areas where limits are artificially low but not the fact that making people drive at a limited speed doesn't save people.
Yes because everyone should be able to go any speed they want and it's only an issue when they hit someone. Argue the unnecessary enforcement in areas where limits are artificially low but not the fact that making people drive at a limited speed doesn't save people.
Former Ontario Police Officer. Advice will become less relevant as the time goes by !
In Ontario, the default maximum rate of speed for city streets (50km/h) and country roads (80km/h) does seem to be arbitrarily set. How can the provincial legislature decide which maximum rate of speed is appropriate for every single road in Ontario? It is only when a municipality enacts a by-law to adjust the maximum rate of speed, this is when most municipalities would conduct traffic studies and investigations to determine what the appropriate speed is for the area, considering factors such as community concerns, the surrounding area (i.e. schools, commercial centres, residential areas), curves and slopes in the road, traffic volumes, traffic signals, etc. If there is any speed limit that is not 50km/h or 80km/h, a by-law has been enacted and a traffic study or investigation has likely been conducted to enact it, and in that case, the speed limit is not arbitrary. But 50 and 80 default does seem to be arbitrary on the face of it. In Ontario, the maximum rate of speed can be adjusted as long as it does not exceed 100km/h. This number also seems to be arbitrarily set. I'm sure there have been countless studies to justify why Ontario (and Canada) sets it at this limit, but Ontario (and Canada) has some of the lowest speed limits anywhere in the world and there's no evidence to suggest that it makes our highways any safer. CBC Marketplace actually looked into this: http://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/episodes/ ... ster-safer But in terms of artificially low speed limits, there doesn't seem to be any recourse in Ontario as there is in the United States. In some jurisdictions in the U.S., you can have a speeding charge dropped if an engineering study shows that the speed limit is artificially low. Where I live in Markham, you can request to have a speed limit to be re-evaluated on a street, but I'm not sure how successful that would be if you bring it to court (luckily I haven't had to test this yet) Side note to jsherk's point: In York Region, the police do not issue any tickets for anything 1-10km/h over the speed limit. I'm not sure about other jurisdictions. Also, I think you'll find these Provincial Offences court statistics interesting: http://www.ontariocourts.ca/ocj/files/s ... tatute.pdf Speeding does have the highest number of charges (559,013 in 2016), but that is the nature of the job of the police officer. It's difficult for the officer to give out the vast majority of the other charges unless s/he explicitly observes you committing the offence while s/he is driving around on patrol. Some of the other popular Provincial Offences charges: - s. 144 Red light - proceed before green (127,386) - s. 7 Drive motor vehicle, no currently validated permit (117,470) - Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act (114,516) - s. 136 Disobey stop sign - fail to stop (51,263) - s. 78.1 Drive - hand-held communication device (51,210) - Municipal by-laws [i.e. parking, signs] (46,878)
In Ontario, the default maximum rate of speed for city streets (50km/h) and country roads (80km/h) does seem to be arbitrarily set. How can the provincial legislature decide which maximum rate of speed is appropriate for every single road in Ontario?
It is only when a municipality enacts a by-law to adjust the maximum rate of speed, this is when most municipalities would conduct traffic studies and investigations to determine what the appropriate speed is for the area, considering factors such as community concerns, the surrounding area (i.e. schools, commercial centres, residential areas), curves and slopes in the road, traffic volumes, traffic signals, etc. If there is any speed limit that is not 50km/h or 80km/h, a by-law has been enacted and a traffic study or investigation has likely been conducted to enact it, and in that case, the speed limit is not arbitrary. But 50 and 80 default does seem to be arbitrary on the face of it.
In Ontario, the maximum rate of speed can be adjusted as long as it does not exceed 100km/h. This number also seems to be arbitrarily set. I'm sure there have been countless studies to justify why Ontario (and Canada) sets it at this limit, but Ontario (and Canada) has some of the lowest speed limits anywhere in the world and there's no evidence to suggest that it makes our highways any safer. CBC Marketplace actually looked into this: http://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/episodes/ ... ster-safer
But in terms of artificially low speed limits, there doesn't seem to be any recourse in Ontario as there is in the United States. In some jurisdictions in the U.S., you can have a speeding charge dropped if an engineering study shows that the speed limit is artificially low. Where I live in Markham, you can request to have a speed limit to be re-evaluated on a street, but I'm not sure how successful that would be if you bring it to court (luckily I haven't had to test this yet)
Side note to jsherk's point: In York Region, the police do not issue any tickets for anything 1-10km/h over the speed limit. I'm not sure about other jurisdictions.
Speeding does have the highest number of charges (559,013 in 2016), but that is the nature of the job of the police officer. It's difficult for the officer to give out the vast majority of the other charges unless s/he explicitly observes you committing the offence while s/he is driving around on patrol.
Some of the other popular Provincial Offences charges:
- s. 144 Red light - proceed before green (127,386)
- s. 7 Drive motor vehicle, no currently validated permit (117,470)
- Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act (114,516)
- s. 136 Disobey stop sign - fail to stop (51,263)
- s. 78.1 Drive - hand-held communication device (51,210)
- Municipal by-laws [i.e. parking, signs] (46,878)
The problem here is not the law, it's how the speed limit is decided. As it's been mentioned earlier in the thread, we do not set the speed limit based on engineering facts, it's decided by a bunch of politicians. Some times it is to please the nagging group and get their vote and some times it is a simple money grab. Here is an example, Danforth Ave. over the DVP bridge, there is absolutely nothing there, no store front, no cross walk and a long stretch of wide street, speed limit 40 Km/h. A perfect speed trap, I am not sure when the speed limit was changed in this section of the road from 50 to 40, as I was driving home the other day I saw the speed limit and thought to myself this is a money grab zone, sure enough 150 meters down the road a car was pulled over by an officer enforcing the speed limit. Now let's look at HWY 7 in Markham, between Kennedy and McCowan, ton of stores and other traffic, speed limit 70 Km/h. Really? And then it drops to 50 east of McCowan, why? No reason... HWY 7 speed limit goes up and down like a yoyo in Markham and if you are not keeping up with the change you are asking for trouble. If the speed limit was set by either city planning engineers or the police department based on what the road can actually handle, then things would be much better. We continue to complain about traffic and how congested it is, but rather than use engineering solutions and technology to improve flow, we simply reduce speed limit and put up more obstacles to slow down traffic movement. Downtown intersections with criss cross pedestrian crossings, great idea, but they forgot about motorist... Once the light changes, the pedestrians continue to cross the street like an ordinary intersection, this prevents the cars from making a right turn, as a result the right lane is taken out by cars trying to make a turn. But if the pedestrians were blocked and cars were allowed to make right turns, this would improve traffic flow and speed traffic through the intersection. In Germany bicycles do not ride on the road, they share the side walk with pedestrians, there is clear marking showing which side is for bikes and which side for pedestrians. Off course I was not used to this and always walked on the wrong side like an idiot and they had to ring their bell, telling me to get out of their way...
The problem here is not the law, it's how the speed limit is decided.
As it's been mentioned earlier in the thread, we do not set the speed limit based on engineering facts, it's decided by a bunch of politicians. Some times it is to please the nagging group and get their vote and some times it is a simple money grab.
Here is an example, Danforth Ave. over the DVP bridge, there is absolutely nothing there, no store front, no cross walk and a long stretch of wide street, speed limit 40 Km/h. A perfect speed trap, I am not sure when the speed limit was changed in this section of the road from 50 to 40, as I was driving home the other day I saw the speed limit and thought to myself this is a money grab zone, sure enough 150 meters down the road a car was pulled over by an officer enforcing the speed limit.
Now let's look at HWY 7 in Markham, between Kennedy and McCowan, ton of stores and other traffic, speed limit 70 Km/h. Really? And then it drops to 50 east of McCowan, why? No reason...
HWY 7 speed limit goes up and down like a yoyo in Markham and if you are not keeping up with the change you are asking for trouble.
If the speed limit was set by either city planning engineers or the police department based on what the road can actually handle, then things would be much better.
We continue to complain about traffic and how congested it is, but rather than use engineering solutions and technology to improve flow, we simply reduce speed limit and put up more obstacles to slow down traffic movement.
Downtown intersections with criss cross pedestrian crossings, great idea, but they forgot about motorist... Once the light changes, the pedestrians continue to cross the street like an ordinary intersection, this prevents the cars from making a right turn, as a result the right lane is taken out by cars trying to make a turn. But if the pedestrians were blocked and cars were allowed to make right turns, this would improve traffic flow and speed traffic through the intersection.
In Germany bicycles do not ride on the road, they share the side walk with pedestrians, there is clear marking showing which side is for bikes and which side for pedestrians. Off course I was not used to this and always walked on the wrong side like an idiot and they had to ring their bell, telling me to get out of their way...
Hi so I have a bizzare situation. Today I received a summons for "being the owner of a motor vehicle bearing Vehicle Identification Number ###, failed to submit the vehicle, equipment or drawn vehicle for inspection or tests as required by an officer" for a vehicle I previously owned. Apparently a violation of HTA 82(9).
The date of offense is June 15, the summons was issued on October 26th and I…
Hi, I need some help for the ticket of lmproper left turn.
When i drove my car from east to west, intending to make a left turn and stop in front of stop line. There was a car in front of me, which has turn on yellow light. The light was turning red and then I thought I cannot leave in the intersection and turned, an incoming car was runing the light and hit me. No one got hurt but both cars had…
Have a ticket in which the radar used was a Genesis VP Directional. I had downloaded the manual for a Genesis VP but I now realize that the unit is not the same so it is the wrong manual. My trial is very soon so I do not have time to ask for disclosure of the manual.
Does anyone have access to an electronic version of the manual for Genesis VP Directional?
I was pulled over today in the city of Oakville for going 75 in a 40 zone. However, I am 100 percent certain that I was going only 50 in the 40 zone. When I was pulled over, I was driving my Dad's car which I felt was the reason I was getting stopped since two teenagers driving a 2013 S Class. He asked does I know why I am being pulled over and I…
I really need help on fighting my 9 tickets i received from one police officer. Here is some background of what happened!
I was caught speeding 66km on a 40km (school zone) on January 29, 2010. I was driving my friend's car and turns out she didnt renew the validation on the vehicle and didnt leave the up to date insurance paper on the car.
Hey question that I think here's probably the best place to get the answer:
I was charged with a careless driving offence in oct, trail in early april, so as of right now my insurance record is 100% clean... except the officer did file an accident report at the scene where I was classified at fault due to it being PI (although very minor). The person I hit did not sue etc, so the insurance company…
Very much unintentionally passed a stopped bus, with sign and flashing lights. Didn't realize I had done it until I was at the end of the bus. I'll save you my sob story, but it was truly accidental. I'm generally very cautious and have a perfect driving record. Never been stopped.
While I realize if a cop had seen me that I would have gotten a ticket, there were none in sight. Though I may very…
I was recently pulled over for running a red and I wasnt able to find my wallet in the car at the time to hand over my license. I had a passport in the vehicle that he used. The wallet was in the vehicle, it just fell through the seats. (Tough to find a black leather wallet in a black/black leather truck at night).
The officer still wrote the tickets for both he signed the one ticket (failure to…
I was passing a vehicle that was going slow for me and there was an oncoming vehicle coming at me. I speed up to get around the person I was passing and the oncoming vehicle turns out to be a cop who turns around and tickets me for going 110km in a 80km zone. How does it work with passing a vehicle? Once I passed the vehicle I went back down to my original speed of just under 100. The officer…
I picked up a brand new (old stock) Fuzzbuster a while ago at auction (wopping $5!!) and I want to mount it on the dash of my old GTO as a cool accessory when I show it at car shows. But I'm not sure if it's legal or not.
Here's my thoughts:
- It is early 70's technology (x-band) so it won't detect modern police radar. That's assuming no police force uses the old x-band frequency.
Hi guys, I'm still a little in shock of getting my first traffic ticket...
On Monday afternoon, I was returning from Toronto to Ottawa on HW416, I was driving about 15 over 100 like always. Then a car came very close to me on the left lane and made me nervous, I speed up unintentionally to pass the car and change lane, but while doing that a police car pull out of the median. He was hiding in…
May i ask this question regarding transport trucks limited to 105 km/h. Moving road blocks or safety?
IMO it isnt speed that kills. I find transport trucks infact help keep the road going. With cars that choose to not move to the right and slow down the middle lane the trucks would try to pass in their passing lane therefore the slower traffic would move right.
Received a notice from the police that a motion is being put forward to adjourn upcoming trial date. Notice indicates that an officer has sworn an affidavit that the crucial witness cannot attend date trial is set for (we know there is a social engagement at 7:30 pm for the witness, trial time is 1:30 pm). This further delay is a big problem to my daughter's case. She is moving away to…
This is what happened. I was travelling west on a four lane city street that was very light with traffic. I was making a left hand turn into a wide driveway of a business. There was traffic lights about 100 yards past the driveway and were red for the east-west traffic. I was in the left lane with my signal on and there was no oncoming traffic due to the red light. I was slowed right down…
I was driving my families older car and got pulled over, and the police officer informed me my plate was dirty. He issued me a ticket of $110 for the 13(2) act and obstruct plate as the offense. He informed me that such a plate could be used to avoid red lights as well as 407 tolls, also that buying a new plate can help to lower the ticket if I fight the charge, and that he also took a picture…
I received a red light camera ticket. In the picture, you see an ambulance in front of me with flashing lights. I had moved to alleviate the traffic behind me for the emergency vehicles coming behind it.
Is this a possible defense, if so, does anyone know any good case law to justify this position?
what happens if they charge someone for driving at 151Km/hr in montreal and they put for trial, appear after some months and sadly lost the trial ?
In montreal its $300 fine and 5demerit points ...
I heard Ontario and Qubec share the information. So once the trial is over ( and when the file moved to ontario) will his car gets towed and licence get suspended for 7days (later to 30 days ) ? and he…
I got a notice in the mail that trial is set four weeks from today, so it's time to request disclosure. I have zero chance of getting an 11b since trial is less than two months after the offense date and the officer did not reduce the charge. I really want to try and create delays on the trial, to reduce the chance of the officer showing up on multiple occasions. Is there any known loop-holes…
This weekend my father was involved in an accident with a transit bus in Burlington, ON. After the police showed up he was charged with "Fail to obey stop sign" Sec. 136(1)(a). At this particular intersection there NO stop signs but there are traffic lights. There is construction going on there so one of the light posts is smaller.
Driving conditions were terribly wet and visibility was low.…
So my boyfriend and I recently started dating. I have a vehicle that was insured. Insurance cost too much and I found it was just as easy to walk to work due to how close it was. But I didn't want to get rid of my car just yet, plus I'm still making payments on it as well. When we moved into our appartment together, I had it towed to my parking spot out back.
I was making a left hand legal turn on a green light, a driver came through the lane I was supposed to be going into ran the red and hit me head on as I was turning into my lane. When the officer came he was telling me that I was racing and driving recklessly because apparently there was reports of street racing in the area. I was not charged on the scene for this but I'm scared i am going to be…
I got a ticket for failure to surrender insurance because I did not have my new insurance stubs with me, just a bunch of expired ones. My policy number has not changed, so I asked the officer to just run the policy number so I could prove that I was in fact insured. He said they don't have that ability, handed me the ticket and reminded me that my car could have been impounded.
So I'm in a bit of a pickle and would appreciate if someone could clarify something for me.
I'm less than a month away (test on April 6th) from getting my full G license, and got a speeding ticket recently. The ticket was for 49km/h over the posted limit of 100km/h on the 403 in Oakville/Halton region, but was reduced from the initial ~60km/h over.
