Page 4 of 4

Re: O.P.P criuser impounded under 172

Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:19 pm
by hwybear
Bookm wrote:You ever notice that some people have no problem completely blocking the isle with their cart at the local supermarket, while they wander around looking for that special brand of bathroom spray they like so much?

You mean you don't help them and "add" an extra grocery item or two to the "abandoned cart"?? Would love to see their faces at check out :lol:


Re: O.P.P criuser impounded under 172

Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:31 pm
by Squishy

HAHAHA

Duct tape, rope, hunting knife, bleach, garbage bags, condoms. :twisted:

Bookm - did they do a lot of "coaching" on CWD? Are the contestants really as bad as they come across as, or are they coached into doing certain things? :(


Re: O.P.P criuser impounded under 172

Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 9:45 am
by Bookm

Ooops! Sworn to secrecy (contract). Must take cyanide pill now ;)


Re: O.P.P criuser impounded under 172

Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:31 pm
by Squishy

Sorry, I should have known there would be something in your contract.

I'll just wait for more slip-ups and put the pieces together. :twisted:


Re: O.P.P criuser impounded under 172

Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:22 pm
by hwybear
Squishy wrote:HAHAHA

Duct tape, rope, hunting knife, bleach, garbage bags, condoms. :twisted:

sardines, olives :lol:


Re: O.P.P criuser impounded under 172

Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:59 pm
by Radar Identified

Anchovies, artificial sweeteners, synthetic milk flavouring, and, of course, non-alcoholic beer. :twisted:


Re: O.P.P criuser impounded under 172

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 2:14 am
by Reflections

Y'all is forgettin the tin foil.....


Re: O.P.P criuser impounded under 172

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:50 pm
by tdrive2

Hey hwybear if you wear a tinfoil hat on a 400 series highways i heard you can use it to be warned of any speed traps.

If you got pulled over with one would that also count as a speed measuring warning device. Would you confiscate the hat or impound the person to a mental hospital :lol:


Re: O.P.P criuser impounded under 172

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:51 pm
by hwybear

Thought I saw you going down the 401.....thanks for the confirmation :shock:

Image


Re: O.P.P criuser impounded under 172

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:21 pm
by tdrive2

haha now dressing up like that is infact a STUNT confiscate the hat!


Re: O.P.P criuser impounded under 172

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:25 pm
by tdrive2

It's the 24th i want to hear what happened and see the real integrity of this system.

This Officer did this by no accident and was not on call or on or in range of duties. After reading that article about crashing into a women going over a hillcrest at 168 i hope she gets it worse.

Anyone hear what happened yet?


Re: O.P.P criuser impounded under 172

Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 6:03 pm
by tdrive2

It's the 25th any news? I guess no one cares and it got thrown out.

Shame when we here stories of others doing this it seems such a big deal but it seems Okay if an officer does it regardless of the situation on duty or off duty. I didnt know that having a black and white cruiser with a Fancy LED light bar on the top was a license to speed at any time.

This should be a big deal. Especially after reading about the other time she got caught going 168 and crashing into another van this doesn't seem like she did it by accident...