Do I need to yield on a narrow street?
Thoughts?
The other driver has the right of way.
But thankyou for the information. Technically I was wrong.
Rather, we drive on the 1/2 of the road that's remaining to the left of the parked cars.
But in a collision situation I would say that you'd be in the wrong.
Former Ontario Police Officer. Advice will become less relevant as the time goes by !
- highwaystar
- Sr. Member
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 5:46 pm
Thanks, makes sense.argyll wrote: ↑Mon Jun 11, 2018 11:56 amIt does say the centre of the roadway as opposed to the centre of the available roadway. I see your point and 99 times out of 100 you'd just slow down, pass the other driver and that would be the end of it but you managed to find the one who wanted to yell at you.
But in a collision situation I would say that you'd be in the wrong.
... not exactly, no one needed to yield, just slow down. Also in this particular case, there was a line of parked cars, rather than an obstacle.highwaystar wrote: ↑Mon Jun 11, 2018 12:04 pmThe one with the obstacle in front of them is the one who must yield. Its clear as day. Why would the opposing driver (with no obstacle in front of them (e.g. parked car) have to take any steps when they have a clear path? It would be a mockery of traffic law any other way. The odd thing is that many drivers don't understand this basic rule of yielding. Somehow, the person confronted with the parked car in front of them still feels entitled to make the opposing driver wait while THEY proceed. Its yet another example of our self-entitled society. I always laugh when I see this happen.
-
- Jr. Member
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 1:15 pm
Assuming that there is physically room for both vehicles, what's the difference vs. a roadway which was the narrower dimension to start with?
Suspect we're dealing with common law / case law here as opposed to the written law.
- highwaystar
- Sr. Member
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 5:46 pm
A line of parked cars IS an obstacle. The definition of an obstacle is "a thing that blocks one's way or prevents or hinders progress". So, ANYTHING (including cars, unicorns, dragons, ghosts, etc.) that is in the path of YOUR vehicle is an obstacle that YOU must stop if needed; its certainly not the driver with the clear way that has that obligation!!!! The other driver is not the one who must yield to you; YOU are the one who must yield since YOU are the one with the obstacle in your path! Its not just the definition of yielding (and right of way); its plain common sense.

Yes, good point. When there's no line, most people would not be aware of this. It was rather ironic she was yelling at me saying I should have yielded but at the same moment, she was passing me no problem, albeit at a slower than 50km/h speed.whaddyaknow wrote: ↑Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:51 pmThis is an interesting one, for me anyhow.
Assuming that there is physically room for both vehicles, what's the difference vs. a roadway which was the narrower dimension to start with?
Suspect we're dealing with common law / case law here as opposed to the written law.
Last edited by denish on Mon Jun 11, 2018 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
That's the thing, it wasn't needed. There was room for both. She just didn't like it because she didn't have 50% of the entire street. It's a quiet street with no dividing line. She had only 40% of the entire road and yelled at me over that 10%.highwaystar wrote: ↑Mon Jun 11, 2018 4:49 pm... that is in the path of YOUR vehicle is an obstacle that YOU must stop if needed; ...
- highwaystar
- Sr. Member
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 5:46 pm
148 (1) Every person in charge of a vehicle on a highway meeting another vehicle shall turn out to the right from the centre of the roadway, allowing the other vehicle one-half of the roadway free.
The problem is that some folks interpret that to mean that you must give opposing traffic half of whatever portion of the road is free. But, that flies in the face of the rules of yielding and right-of-way.
Clearly, if there is a dividing line painted, you must stay within your lane and its self-explanatory----you must yield (and stop if necessary) if there is any obstacle in your lane that does not allow you to pass without going over the dividing line. The opposing driver does not have to yield to you nor move over to make room for your vehicle to go on to his half.
However, where there is no dividing line, the same rule should apply. The width of the road remains constant----regardless of whether there is parked or stopped cars (or any other obstacle) on the side. The interpretation most consistent with the general traffic regime is that the one with the obstacle MUST be the one who must yield to the other. In other words, the use of the word 'free' is indicating that you must not take up any portion of the opposing driver's half----his half must remain free.
If that were not the interpretation than it would create chaos in the law when both sides of the road are obstructed. If the width of the road changed, then which vehicle would have right of way when only 1 can safely pass if both have equal right to their 'half' of the available roadway? It would be chaos!
So, the first definition is the more consistent. Still, I agree that the section should be worded better to avoid such confusion.
While the courts have generally adapted the interpetation I have given in civil cases, to my knowledge, there has not been a definitive decision with regards to that section where there is NO dividing line. Rather, the cases have all had a dividing line.
So, your question is very valid.
-
- Similar Topics
-
-
New post Passing on the right on a one lane street!
by Noahide Laws in Improper passingLast post by Decatur Thu Mar 31, 2016 7:08 pm
-
-
-
New post Incorrect street of offence
by mskl87 in General TalkLast post by bobajob Tue Feb 21, 2017 11:55 am
-
-
-
New post 104 km/h Stunt Driving in a 50 km/h street in Vaughan
Last post by Decatur Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:01 pm
-
-
-
New post I did not yield to a bus. Who would be at fault?
Last post by Whenaxis Tue Feb 07, 2017 10:18 pm
-
-
-
New post HTA 139(1) failing to yield from private drive
Last post by whaddyaknow Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:14 am
-
-
-
New post HTA 144(7): Fail to Yield to Pedestrian - left turn, dashcam
Last post by EphOph Fri Feb 03, 2017 9:19 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Help us, Help You!
Hello, we notice you may be using an adblocker...