91 km/h in a posted 50 zone
For what its worth, I've been driving for 10 years with zero offenses or at-fault accidents. When giving me the ticket, the officer recommended taking option 2 - guilty with explanation, saying that if I've never had a ticket it would likely be reduced.
Naturally my first choice would be to try to get this thrown out entirely, my concern is if I plead not guilty, the prosecutor will amend the charge to 51 over which is a major offense, will severely impact my insurance and may affect my work (I go through security clearance screening every 5 or 10 years).
If i plead guilty with explanation and show up in court can the charge be amended to the higher amount? My strategy for explanation is my driving record and that the 70 sign was visible so i was less mindful of my speed. How likely is this to help? If I don't like the outcome do I still have the option of trial?
Images of my ticket are attached, looking for general advice - thanks in advance!
EDIT: the image quality is very poor for some reason when uploaded...
The top right corner of the ticket, the officer noted "51 km/h over, court date, 7 day impound + d1 susp"
The back of the ticket option 2 states: "Plea of Guilty - Submissions as to Penalty: I want to appear before a justice to enter a plea of guilty and make submissions as to penalty (amount of fine or time to pay). Note: you must attend the court office shown below within the time and days shown"
- Attachments
-
- Ticket.jpg (19.72 KiB) Viewed 1385 times
-
- ticket2.jpg (22.4 KiB) Viewed 1385 times
The standard time to pay is 30 days. I once convinced a JP to give a friend who had just started a business, investing a substantial portion of her life savings, but was in hospital because of a car accident 180 days to pay.
Thanks for the reply. Given my scenario you would just pay the ticket and not risk it getting amended in court?Zatota wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2018 9:15 pmThe charge would only be amended if you plead not guilty. If you plead guilty, it will remain at 41 km/h over. Don't count on the speed being reduced further. If anything, a sympathetic JP could reduce the amount of the fine (if, for example, you can demonstrate financial hardship) or, more likely, give you additional time to pay.
The standard time to pay is 30 days. I once convinced a JP to give a friend who had just started a business, investing a substantial portion of her life savings, but was in hospital because of a car accident 180 days to pay.
Is a ticket as high as 41 over really grouped similar to other minor offenses with respect to insurance?
How come I don't have the option of early resolution many have mentioned in the forum?
Thanks again.
Generally, speeding 1-49km/h above the speed limit is considered a minor offence for most insurance companies. 50+km/h above the speed limit is major. The only difference in terms of speed is that 30-49km/h over the speed limit carries 4 demerit points. But with 10 years clean driving record, demerit points don't really matter until you start racking up a lot of them.
Early resolution was only previously available in certain areas -- and increasingly is no longer been offered because it lengthens the time it takes to go to trial (for those who choose early resolution and then choose to go to trial) and because the same deals made during early resolution are also generally offered again at trial.
I am considering option 3, my hesitation is that the prosecutor has leverage (the ability to amend the charge to a major) and will be unwilling to bargain/offer a plea deal...
Would it be common for the prosecutor to take into account my driving record and offer a better deal?
I'm not too worried about a few hundred dollars for the fine, my worry is that this will cost thousands in the long run through increased insurance premiums for 3 years.
Marko
The prosecutor will not so much look at your driving record -- the only time that it might be considered is if you have a lot of previous convictions, then they won't be willing to offer a deal or they might ask for a higher penalty if it proceeds to a full trial.
But often times, I've seen prosecutors offer the same deal for the same charge indiscriminately because there's a lot of cases to deal with in a short amount of time. The prosecutor wants to avoid a full trial because it takes a lot of time. Even in cases where the evidence is clear, prosecutors have offered plea deals. For example, for speeding charges, I've seen prosecutors reduce down to 15km/h over even when the charge has already been reduced at the roadside by the police officer.
I was looking at research online from Insurance.com and a study showed that these were the average increases based on speed:
- Speeding 40 km/h over the limit: 15 per cent
- Speeding 25-39 km/h over the limit: 12 per cent
- Speeding 1-25 km/h over the limit: 11 per cent
-
- Similar Topics
-
-
New post 121 km/h in a posted 80 km/h - Disclosure attached
Last post by screeech Fri Jul 28, 2017 2:46 pm
-
-
-
New post 131 in a posted 90 and failure to provide Insurance. Reduced
Last post by argyll Tue Jan 23, 2018 7:52 pm
-
-
-
New post Missing Sign Posted (Northbound) yet showing Southbound.
by powerbyford in General TalkLast post by powerbyford2 Fri Sep 09, 2016 11:51 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
Help us, Help You!
Hello, we notice you may be using an adblocker...