section 137- clarifcation

Posts: 5

section 137- clarifcation

Unread post by yaboudi »

can someone please clarify the below section.

i saw on ticket combat to request disclosure. wait till after the prosecution rests and file a motion of non suit for improper discolsure.. That the procusctors office did not give in the disclosure on the by laws.

Can anyone clarify this? will this work in court for a stop sign?

Section 137 of the HTA says:
Stop signs, erection at intersections
137. In addition to stop signs required at intersections on through highways,
(a) the council of a municipality may by by-law provide for the erection of stop signs at intersections on highways under its jurisdiction; and
(b) the Minister may by regulation designate intersections on the King’s Highway at which stop signs shall be erected,
and every sign so erected shall comply with the regulations of the Ministry. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 137; 2002, c. 17, Sched. F, Table.

User avatar
Posts: 685

Re: section 137- clarifcation

Unread post by Decatur »

This is the third thread you've started on the same incident and I believe the question on the filing if the bylaws was answered for you.

Post Reply

Return to “Failing to obey signs”