Viewing profile - alexo
-
-
Banning policies
racer wrote:Spambots will be banned immediately upon discovery, as well as any users who do not have a single post for more than 30 days, as this is t…
- 164 Replies
- 111027 Views
- Last post
Wed Nov 26, 2008 8:03 pm View the latest post
-
-
Hello Bear,
hwybear wrote:Alexo....did not take that offensive or upsetting.
It was not meant to be.
hwybear wrote:I see your view. There are reaso…
- 8 Replies
- 2115 Views
- Last post
Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:09 pm View the latest post
-
-
Re: GPS
hwybear wrote:Just bought my 1st GPS. Pretty decent little outfit. Have used it on a couple of short trips and got me to the destintation properly.
…
- 11 Replies
- 1515 Views
- Last post
Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:54 pm View the latest post
-
-
Hello Bear,
There is a rant coming. I will try to keep it short and civil but make no mistake, I feel very strongly about it.
hwybear wrote:This kin…
- 8 Replies
- 2115 Views
- Last post
Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:29 pm View the latest post
-
-
Hello Bear,
hwybear wrote:About 3/4 way down is the officers signature and DATE to the right is the supervisor signature and DATE. How does this com…
- 29 Replies
- 3542 Views
- Last post
Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:25 pm View the latest post
-
-
hwybear wrote:alexo wrote:The interesting part is that the "Traffic Collision Report" I got on the spot (with the ticket) has quite a number of differ…
- 29 Replies
- 3542 Views
- Last post
Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:12 pm View the latest post
-
-
Hi Bookm, thank you for the reply.
Bookm wrote:Sure the Court COULD allow the ticket to be amended, but you would want to object to this. You have pre…
- 29 Replies
- 3542 Views
- Last post
Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:53 pm View the latest post
-
-
lawmen wrote:alexo wrote:However, I was charged with violating 142(1) and not 148.
I believe that the best strategy would be to contest it on that gr…
- 29 Replies
- 3542 Views
- Last post
Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:32 am View the latest post
-
-
Re: Disclosure questions
hwybear wrote:A few issues here. By HTA police have to submit the Collision Report within 10 days. Our internal policy is 7 days.
The collision repo…
- 10 Replies
- 1606 Views
- Last post
Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:17 am View the latest post
-
-
Re: Disclosure questions
ticketcombat wrote:First, thanks for the positive feedback on my site.
You deserve it.
ticketcombat wrote:As I don't know the details, I can speculat…
- 10 Replies
- 1606 Views
- Last post
Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:12 am View the latest post
-
-
hwybear wrote:alexo wrote:More or less. Cop's notes say I "cut the corner". Interesting since he arrived an hour after the fact..
Does not really mat…
- 29 Replies
- 3542 Views
- Last post
Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:53 am View the latest post
-
-
Thanks for your reply hwybear.
hwybear wrote:I would be guess that HTA 148 applies to the description provided.
Passing meeting vehicles - vehicle on…
- 29 Replies
- 3542 Views
- Last post
Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 am View the latest post
-
-
lawmen wrote:You said there was no accident i.e., damage or injury?
Did I? I'm sorry, English is not my native language and I am even less familiar w…
- 29 Replies
- 3542 Views
- Last post
Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:39 pm View the latest post
-
-
ticketcombat wrote:This is really a great example to request disclosure including a request for an explanation and clarification of the charge. Let t…
- 29 Replies
- 3542 Views
- Last post
Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:49 pm View the latest post
-
-
lawmen wrote:read this site.
www.ticketcombat.com/
Already did (great resource) and that what prompted these questions.
- 10 Replies
- 1606 Views
- Last post
Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:42 pm View the latest post
-
-
Hello Reflections, thank you for your reply.
Reflections wrote:OK. "ACCIDENT"=Representation.
Nuff said.
As in "legal representation"?
- 10 Replies
- 1606 Views
- Last post
Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:48 am View the latest post
-
-
Disclosure questions
Hello people,
Some questions:
1. What should be a reasonable time for the prosecutor to provide disclosure from the first faxed request (2 reminders…
- 10 Replies
- 1606 Views
- Last post
Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:06 am View the latest post
-
-
lawmen wrote:Try the Supreme Court of Canada for caselaw with respect to lanes.
Nothing relevant on csc.lexum.umontreal.ca
The only case I found that …
- 29 Replies
- 3542 Views
- Last post
Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:39 am View the latest post
-
-
Hi lawmen, thanks for your reply.
lawmen wrote:Interesting case. Keep searching case law and you might find something to help you.
Gladly but I feel …
- 29 Replies
- 3542 Views
- Last post
Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:46 am View the latest post
-
-
Also 186(1) mentions "left lane".
It is obvious that it talks about same-direction lanes (otherwise the left lane would be oncoming traffic)
- 29 Replies
- 3542 Views
- Last post
Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:53 pm View the latest post
Add to Home Screen