Viewing profile - pam
-
- pam’s recent activity
- replies
- views
- Date
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
Had a trial date. It was 5 tickets all together along with the ones we discussed earlier in these posts. Prosecutor was withdrawing the charges on 3 … - 29 replies
- 1510 views
- Last post Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:16 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
The driver did not get the ticket for unsafe vehicle. It was dump truck and the registered gross weigh was 11,000 kg (according to officer notes) Got… - 29 replies
- 1510 views
- Last post Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:41 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
I understand, just trying to know the facts so if needed, can defend this issue. Just found: Record keeping requirements under Highway Traffic Act … - 29 replies
- 1510 views
- Last post Thu Jul 20, 2017 2:03 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
Well, I am trying to find something on Ministry's website which can be referred that officer can not tear off the log book page. But thanks for tons o… - 29 replies
- 1510 views
- Last post Thu Jul 20, 2017 11:25 am View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
Actually Driver was charged for fail to note defect on trip log also (under HTA 107 (8) (A) for that defect we was talking about earlier. There was n… - 29 replies
- 1510 views
- Last post Wed Jul 19, 2017 5:28 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
Is there any legal provision can be offered for this? How this will be proved or say in the court that a police officer can not or not suppose to take… - 29 replies
- 1510 views
- Last post Wed Jul 19, 2017 2:26 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
But no inspection report was provided afterwards also. Officer just tear off the top white page (original copy- since log book has duplicate yellow co… - 29 replies
- 1510 views
- Last post Mon Jul 17, 2017 5:28 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
oh! officer did not provide any inspection report. he just ask the driver to put the truck in drive (first) gear. Driver did that. The truck did not m… - 29 replies
- 1510 views
- Last post Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:27 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
Sorry my mistake. there were two tickets, one to driver, one to company (CVOR) Driver charged with 107 (11) and Company charged with 107 (3) - 29 replies
- 1510 views
- Last post Fri Jul 07, 2017 12:11 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
Thanks ShrekTec and screeech. You are right. But here in this case, on the offence notice, charged under 107 (3) and it cost 2 points under Convicti… - 29 replies
- 1510 views
- Last post Thu Jul 06, 2017 4:30 pm View the latest post
-