Sorry, to get back to you so late, I was out of the province for work. No, I didn't object. My question is, if the prosecutor is using the information and evidence of the officer, then don't we have a right to the same information? This new precedence that was set is saying the manual is third party...

Well, were do we begin? I recently was made aware of this matter. I was denied the manual for the speed measuring device used against me. I thought that the onus of disclosure was on the prosecutor. The prosecutor says it's third party material. Prosecutor then lets the officer make statement that h...

ALL the POINTS I made affect the accuracy of the unit. Radar works on a radio frequency principal made possible by electronics. All the interferences mentioned above are created by electronics. The manufacturer themselves admit to these electronic interferences existing (section 8 of the manual for ...

Sept/14 I attended court in the afternoon session, like I was told, to pick a trial date. The Crown picked a date without me in the morning session. The date was Dec/14. My next trial date is end of Apr/15. I've made a second request to full disclosure even though the Court says I need an Order to g...

To Decatur; What difference does it make whether the manual is Canadian or Us. Electronics work the same way in both countries. As to the obligations of full disclosure by the Crown, they must provide all relevant and requested materials by the Defense. The decision of what is necessary to the Defen...

I got a speeding ticket by moving radar Dec/12. The ticket was 95km in an 80km zone. I took it to court. It just so happened that it was the same cop I beat on two previous tickets. The day of trial the cop recognized me. During recess I stepped out. When I came back the fellow next to me said that ...