I just copied and reformatted your posts onto a single page, printed it an stuck it to the side of my computer.

Wind me up, point me in the right direction and watch me go...

I'm going to try exactly what you said lawmen and see how that goes. I'll get back to you in seven years when it starts to itch. Your post is the first time I've ever seen the problem of opposing a legal situtation stated in a manner that is possible for an ordinary citizen to act on and I plan to t...

ONTARIO CELL PHONE LEGISLATION It will soon be illegal to drive while talking on a hand held cell phone in Ontario. Whenever a law like this gets passed, those in opposition come out of the woodwork. I thought Id clarify how I believe this law came to be passed. The coming Cell Phone legislation is ...

October 31, 2008 John Newell, Pickering, Ontario, Mike Stafford, AM640 Toronto Radio 1 Dundas Street West Suite 1600 Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z3 Dear Mike, I listened to your show about the coming Cell Phone legislation yesterday morning and thought it very interesting in light of the work Ive done rec...

This is an e-mail I sent to the legislature today regarding street racing and the new Cell Phone legislation. There are links to the attachments so you can read where we are at right now: Dear Elected Members of the Ontario Legislature, This is another in my promised education program about environm...

Apparently the street racer special starts tonight. Christina, the reporter who Tim and I were interviewed by told me it was to air on October 1st. Maybe tonight is a lead up. There was a couple of short advisories about it yesterday but I thought I'd wait to talk to Christina or at least Global but...

Hwybear, I think you just passed another credibility test with flying colours.

Too bad you can't bottle common sense and sell it. We have politicians who need at least a quart each. You'd be rich.

That's the Highway Traffic Act. The information released to the pubic from the Attorney General's Office said the seizure was conducted under the Civil Remedies Act. I believe there is a time limit which applies. You can't go on flip flopping about which act charges are going to be laid under foreve...

That was a good post and you make most of my points. The part about the trial before crushing I wasn't able to confirm or otherwise on the net and still haven't been able as the articles I referenced and could find didn't reference it. What the attorney general's office did say was the the Civil Rem...

50 over is still not a stunt if you are used to it. Since the Ontario government is reinventing the English language to suit itself, not the public, it is a stunt to them, but not to anyone with half a brain who knows what the real meaning of the word stunt is. Funk and Wagnalls Stunt 1. A sensatio...

50 over is still not a stunt if you are used to it. still meets the definition under what is a stunt 50 over is first and foremost a speeding offence. The government inventions for the word stunt does not make going 50 over a stunt unless doing it is an unusual occurence. Since many, many drivers o...

I don't really think it matters that the person was a school teacher, priest, mortician, doctor, lawyer, sanitary technician etc...all would have been treated the same. Reference the car crushing....there has been no crushed cars since the revamped Bill 203 that came in effect 30 September 2007. So...

I think you will be quite happy to read the book. It could have been written for you. The first book I wrote THE REBEL MACHINE IDENTITY is more you though. You should read that one too. It's all about my adventures as a street racer. It's a fairly big book. I had a lot of adventures. You can imagine...

While we're agreeing to disagree, I sent one of the posts to the Attorney General's office. There is no point belly-aching unless you are prepared to put your money where your mouth is and I am. I'm also meeting with my MPP tomorrow and one of the things I'm hoping to find out is what convinced him ...

Hwybear, I'm sorry if you thought my post was an attack on you. It wasn't intended that way. I was merely rebutting the statements made in your e-mail. As noted in my rebut, I understand the police are in a nasty position. But not all police personnel are taking the same mild stance you are and more...