Ontariohighwaytrafficact.com

powerbyford2 wrote:

argyll wrote:

There is no correlation between your tickets and the signs going up. It takes waaaaaaaaaaaaay longer for things to happen. That's just a coincidence so I wouldn't waste too much mental energy on that aspect of this.

This (the signs going up) was actually the entire case. The signs were not in accordance of the by-law for almost a decade.

Glade I spent a lot of energy on this As I won the case in court.

Regards,

I never said that the signs were correct or incorrect. I said that your assertion that the signs were erected as a result of your ticket was nonsense.

argyll wrote:

powerbyford2 wrote:

argyll wrote:

There is no correlation between your tickets and the signs going up. It takes waaaaaaaaaaaaay longer for things to happen. That's just a coincidence so I wouldn't waste too much mental energy on that aspect of this.

This (the signs going up) was actually the entire case. The signs were not in accordance of the by-law for almost a decade.

Glade I spent a lot of energy on this As I won the case in court.

Regards,

I never said that the signs were correct or incorrect. I said that your assertion that the signs were erected as a result of your ticket was nonsense.

So the erect the signs and place a temp electronic speed reader as if their was no issue whatsoever.

Your opinion is rather difficult to believe I'm certain given the fact one lane was missing signs and or contained incorrect signs someone clued in

Regards and thanks for your input. PS --> I like the statement in regards to infractions being handed out at 115/118 in 100 zones (I think around here anything above 110 when they get hungry they distribute).

Just to clarify, did the Prosecutor withdraw the charge, or were you found not guilty?

whaddyaknow wrote:

Just to clarify, did the Prosecutor withdraw the charge, or were you found not guilty?

Withdrawn (I wanted to have a trial... denied).