Statistics: Posted by jsherk — Fri Oct 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Statistics: Posted by EphOph — Fri Oct 21, 2016 6:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by jsherk — Fri Oct 14, 2016 7:55 am
Statistics: Posted by EphOph — Thu Oct 13, 2016 10:35 pm
Statistics: Posted by jsherk — Thu Oct 13, 2016 5:22 pm
What is the best strategy of getting the defendant's statement omitted from the police officer's testimony? Do I object when the officer starts reading the defendant's statements? The reasoning seems a bit circular to me because she would only be required to give a statement if she was in a collision totaling more than $2000, which is the whole point of the trial.- few days later, officer comes to see me
- Officer asks if I hit the box
- I said yes
- Officer asks why I didn't report it
- I said I've never hit something before, was scared and was quite shaken up by the whole ordeal and didn't know what to do.
- We go sit in Officer's vehicle and Officer read my rights and then wrote up a ticket.
- I asked Officer if there was anyway I can get let off on a warning as I don't have any previous convictions
- Officer said no
- I take the ticket and said thank you
Statistics: Posted by EphOph — Thu Oct 13, 2016 1:40 pm
Statistics: Posted by jsherk — Fri Sep 09, 2016 7:36 am
Statistics: Posted by Nanuk — Wed Sep 07, 2016 6:39 pm
Statistics: Posted by Markus — Wed Sep 07, 2016 2:32 pm
Statistics: Posted by jsherk — Tue Aug 16, 2016 1:52 pm
Statistics: Posted by EphOph — Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:03 am
Statistics: Posted by EphOph — Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:49 pm
Statistics: Posted by jsherk — Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:13 am
Statistics: Posted by EphOph — Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:51 am
Statistics: Posted by jsherk — Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:20 am
Statistics: Posted by EphOph — Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:06 am
So I doubt that the officer wrote 199(3) on the ticket but I will definitely make a stink to get a copy of it. Most likely "FL REPORT/FURNISH ACC/REQ. INFO" is just the standard summary of the entirety of 199(1).(3) A police officer receiving a report of an accident, as required by this section, shall secure from the person making the report, or by other inquiries where necessary, the particulars of the accident, the persons involved, the extent of the personal injuries or property damage, if any, and the other information that may be necessary to complete a written report concerning the accident and shall forward the report to the Registrar within ten days of the accident. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 199 (3).
Statistics: Posted by EphOph — Tue Aug 09, 2016 9:55 am
Statistics: Posted by jsherk — Tue Aug 09, 2016 9:15 am
Statistics: Posted by EphOph — Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by jsherk — Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:12 pm
Not sure what that last part means but I think the boulevard is not intended for the passage of vehicles."highway" includes a common and public highway, street, avenue, parkway, driveway, square, place, bridge, viaduct or trestle, any part of which is intended for or used by the general public for the passage of vehicles and includes the area between the lateral property lines thereof; ("voie publique")
Section 201 does not have the damage threshold requirement. Should I bring this up to the prosecutor since the wrong charge was laid and it is now >6 months?201. Every person who, as a result of an accident or otherwise, operates or drives a vehicle or leads, rides or drives an animal upon a highway and thereby damages any shrub, tree, pole, light, sign, sod or other property on the highway or a fence bordering the highway shall forthwith report the damage to a police officer. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 201.
Statistics: Posted by EphOph — Mon Aug 08, 2016 7:51 pm
Statistics: Posted by jsherk — Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:10 pm
Statistics: Posted by EphOph — Mon Aug 08, 2016 5:36 pm
Statistics: Posted by uali — Fri Apr 01, 2016 8:55 pm
Statistics: Posted by argyll — Thu Mar 31, 2016 1:05 pm
Statistics: Posted by uali — Thu Mar 31, 2016 12:25 pm
Statistics: Posted by argyll — Thu Mar 31, 2016 12:17 pm
Statistics: Posted by jsherk — Thu Mar 31, 2016 11:57 am
Statistics: Posted by uali — Thu Mar 31, 2016 11:20 am
Statistics: Posted by jsherk — Thu Mar 31, 2016 8:57 am
Statistics: Posted by argyll — Thu Mar 31, 2016 8:35 am
Statistics: Posted by uali — Thu Mar 31, 2016 1:16 am
Statistics: Posted by ts22 — Thu Feb 05, 2015 5:47 pm
Statistics: Posted by gjl — Thu Jun 05, 2014 11:02 pm
Assuming he was charged with fail to report, in my opinion you were correct and the defendant should have been convicted. If you carefully read the statute it refers to an estimation of the damages at the time of the accident:
Statistics: Posted by gjl — Thu Jun 05, 2014 12:53 am
Statistics: Posted by jsherk — Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:56 pm
MsDeeya, if you weren't at fault, why were you charged three times with careless driving? (TIP: This is a rhetorical question.)If you read the details I'm not at fault in many of them...I have read your posts and from my count this is the SEVENTH vehicle you have damaged in almost 6 months. Each time you still maintain that youre a good driver and were "distracted" by one thing to another. I dont think people on this site want to give you advice anymore because our roads are much safer without you on them. The worst part is you still think you havent done anything wrong.
Statistics: Posted by CliffClaven — Wed Apr 02, 2014 12:33 pm
Statistics: Posted by bend — Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:45 am
Statistics: Posted by MsDeeya — Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:25 am
Statistics: Posted by CumminsDiesel — Thu Mar 27, 2014 8:48 am
Statistics: Posted by hawaii — Wed Mar 26, 2014 9:24 pm
Statistics: Posted by CliffClaven — Tue Mar 25, 2014 11:14 am