Hi All, First time poster here. I tried to search this topic but my searches were not coming back with definitive answers, so I apologize in advance if this has been posted before (which I am sure it would, considering how much confusion I see with this issue). So here is my question, and it seems there are two different views on this, however I want to know which one is considered the legal (correct) view as seen from a law enforcement point of view. Want to try and explain this clearly, so here goes. I will use the following example. Scenario 1 A paved county road going north/south crosses a highway going east/west and has a stop sign at each side before crossing the highway. Two vehicles driving on the county road approach the highway from opposite directions and stop at the stop signs at the same time (cars are facing each other across the highway). Now legally, both cars arriving and stopping at the same time, the car going straight through goes first - if the opposite car is turning left across the path of the vehicle going straight - this is straight forward and is a basic rule of the road everyone should know. Now what about this. A car driving north is waiting for traffic to clear on the highway before turning left onto the highway. In the process of waiting for traffic to clear, a vehicle approaches on the county road but is going straight through. Who has the right of way? The vehicle that has been sitting there for 10+ seconds but is turning left (across the path of the oncoming vehicle), or the vehicle that arrived ten seconds after the car turning left had already been waiting? Scenario 2 Same scenario above, but three cars lined up behind each other on both North and South sides of the highway. Three cars facing north are going straight through but one car from the South is waiting to turn left ACROSS the path of the cars facing North. Some people assume that all cars going North and straight across the highway get the right of way, where the car turning left across the path of the cars facing north (and going straight through) has to wait (maybe indefinitely) for the way to be clear before turning. I see this as being impractical, because what if this is a busy intersection, where vehicles must wait for the highway (east / west) to be clear before crossing the highway, and vehicles just keep lining up one after the other because the highway is busy, before driving across it. The vehicle facing south and turning left across the path of north bound traffic would never get a chance to go. The second view is that both cars arrive the same time. The car traveling north and going straight, goes first. The second car going north and straight, waits, allowing the car facing south (that was already there and waiting) but turning left across the path of the vehicles facing north, to go. This is than repeated, allowing each person the opportunity to go safely. I tend to wait. If I am behind a car going straight, they go, but if there is another vehicle waiting to turn left (from their perspective) across in front of me, that was already there waiting, I will tend to wait for them to go. So what is the correct way? 1 or 2? I can see 1 being legal, however this also means that unless someone 'breaks the rule' and gives the car turning left a courtesy, that car (waiting to turn left) may be sitting there for a long time and backing up traffic behind them. So in these 2 scenarios, which is the legally recognized correct way? Thanks
Hi All,
First time poster here. I tried to search this topic but my searches were not coming back with definitive answers, so I apologize in advance if this has been posted before (which I am sure it would, considering how much confusion I see with this issue).
So here is my question, and it seems there are two different views on this, however I want to know which one is considered the legal (correct) view as seen from a law enforcement point of view. Want to try and explain this clearly, so here goes.
I will use the following example.
Scenario 1
A paved county road going north/south crosses a highway going east/west and has a stop sign at each side before crossing the highway. Two vehicles driving on the county road approach the highway from opposite directions and stop at the stop signs at the same time (cars are facing each other across the highway). Now legally, both cars arriving and stopping at the same time, the car going straight through goes first - if the opposite car is turning left across the path of the vehicle going straight - this is straight forward and is a basic rule of the road everyone should know.
Now what about this. A car driving north is waiting for traffic to clear on the highway before turning left onto the highway. In the process of waiting for traffic to clear, a vehicle approaches on the county road but is going straight through. Who has the right of way? The vehicle that has been sitting there for 10+ seconds but is turning left (across the path of the oncoming vehicle), or the vehicle that arrived ten seconds after the car turning left had already been waiting?
Scenario 2
Same scenario above, but three cars lined up behind each other on both North and South sides of the highway. Three cars facing north are going straight through but one car from the South is waiting to turn left ACROSS the path of the cars facing North. Some people assume that all cars going North and straight across the highway get the right of way, where the car turning left across the path of the cars facing north (and going straight through) has to wait (maybe indefinitely) for the way to be clear before turning. I see this as being impractical, because what if this is a busy intersection, where vehicles must wait for the highway (east / west) to be clear before crossing the highway, and vehicles just keep lining up one after the other because the highway is busy, before driving across it. The vehicle facing south and turning left across the path of north bound traffic would never get a chance to go.
The second view is that both cars arrive the same time. The car traveling north and going straight, goes first. The second car going north and straight, waits, allowing the car facing south (that was already there and waiting) but turning left across the path of the vehicles facing north, to go. This is than repeated, allowing each person the opportunity to go safely.
I tend to wait. If I am behind a car going straight, they go, but if there is another vehicle waiting to turn left (from their perspective) across in front of me, that was already there waiting, I will tend to wait for them to go.
So what is the correct way? 1 or 2? I can see 1 being legal, however this also means that unless someone 'breaks the rule' and gives the car turning left a courtesy, that car (waiting to turn left) may be sitting there for a long time and backing up traffic behind them.
So in these 2 scenarios, which is the legally recognized correct way?
Basically just remember first come, first serve. The first vehicle to a stop at the stop sign has right of way over other vehicles at the stop sign. Doesnt matter if youre proceeding straight through or turning.
Basically just remember first come, first serve. The first vehicle to a stop at the stop sign has right of way over other vehicles at the stop sign. Doesnt matter if youre proceeding straight through or turning.
Thanks guys, and sorry for a rehash of a previous topic :( I guess it just goes to show how out of touch people have become with driving these days. 17 years driving experience (including a couple years driving tractor trailer) and never had a HTA ticket. Sometimes I feel/think I am the only one on the road that obeys laws and safe driving habits (speed, following distances, signal lights, traffic laws, right of ways, four way stops, out of order traffic lights, etc) Anyways, thanks for reaffirming.
Thanks guys, and sorry for a rehash of a previous topic
I guess it just goes to show how out of touch people have become with driving these days. 17 years driving experience (including a couple years driving tractor trailer) and never had a HTA ticket. Sometimes I feel/think I am the only one on the road that obeys laws and safe driving habits (speed, following distances, signal lights, traffic laws, right of ways, four way stops, out of order traffic lights, etc)
Hi so I have a bizzare situation. Today I received a summons for "being the owner of a motor vehicle bearing Vehicle Identification Number ###, failed to submit the vehicle, equipment or drawn vehicle for inspection or tests as required by an officer" for a vehicle I previously owned. Apparently a violation of HTA 82(9).
The date of offense is June 15, the summons was issued on October 26th and I…
Hi, I need some help for the ticket of lmproper left turn.
When i drove my car from east to west, intending to make a left turn and stop in front of stop line. There was a car in front of me, which has turn on yellow light. The light was turning red and then I thought I cannot leave in the intersection and turned, an incoming car was runing the light and hit me. No one got hurt but both cars had…
Have a ticket in which the radar used was a Genesis VP Directional. I had downloaded the manual for a Genesis VP but I now realize that the unit is not the same so it is the wrong manual. My trial is very soon so I do not have time to ask for disclosure of the manual.
Does anyone have access to an electronic version of the manual for Genesis VP Directional?
I was pulled over today in the city of Oakville for going 75 in a 40 zone. However, I am 100 percent certain that I was going only 50 in the 40 zone. When I was pulled over, I was driving my Dad's car which I felt was the reason I was getting stopped since two teenagers driving a 2013 S Class. He asked does I know why I am being pulled over and I…
I really need help on fighting my 9 tickets i received from one police officer. Here is some background of what happened!
I was caught speeding 66km on a 40km (school zone) on January 29, 2010. I was driving my friend's car and turns out she didnt renew the validation on the vehicle and didnt leave the up to date insurance paper on the car.
Hey question that I think here's probably the best place to get the answer:
I was charged with a careless driving offence in oct, trail in early april, so as of right now my insurance record is 100% clean... except the officer did file an accident report at the scene where I was classified at fault due to it being PI (although very minor). The person I hit did not sue etc, so the insurance company…
Very much unintentionally passed a stopped bus, with sign and flashing lights. Didn't realize I had done it until I was at the end of the bus. I'll save you my sob story, but it was truly accidental. I'm generally very cautious and have a perfect driving record. Never been stopped.
While I realize if a cop had seen me that I would have gotten a ticket, there were none in sight. Though I may very…
I was recently pulled over for running a red and I wasnt able to find my wallet in the car at the time to hand over my license. I had a passport in the vehicle that he used. The wallet was in the vehicle, it just fell through the seats. (Tough to find a black leather wallet in a black/black leather truck at night).
The officer still wrote the tickets for both he signed the one ticket (failure to…
I was passing a vehicle that was going slow for me and there was an oncoming vehicle coming at me. I speed up to get around the person I was passing and the oncoming vehicle turns out to be a cop who turns around and tickets me for going 110km in a 80km zone. How does it work with passing a vehicle? Once I passed the vehicle I went back down to my original speed of just under 100. The officer…
I picked up a brand new (old stock) Fuzzbuster a while ago at auction (wopping $5!!) and I want to mount it on the dash of my old GTO as a cool accessory when I show it at car shows. But I'm not sure if it's legal or not.
Here's my thoughts:
- It is early 70's technology (x-band) so it won't detect modern police radar. That's assuming no police force uses the old x-band frequency.
Hi guys, I'm still a little in shock of getting my first traffic ticket...
On Monday afternoon, I was returning from Toronto to Ottawa on HW416, I was driving about 15 over 100 like always. Then a car came very close to me on the left lane and made me nervous, I speed up unintentionally to pass the car and change lane, but while doing that a police car pull out of the median. He was hiding in…
May i ask this question regarding transport trucks limited to 105 km/h. Moving road blocks or safety?
IMO it isnt speed that kills. I find transport trucks infact help keep the road going. With cars that choose to not move to the right and slow down the middle lane the trucks would try to pass in their passing lane therefore the slower traffic would move right.
Received a notice from the police that a motion is being put forward to adjourn upcoming trial date. Notice indicates that an officer has sworn an affidavit that the crucial witness cannot attend date trial is set for (we know there is a social engagement at 7:30 pm for the witness, trial time is 1:30 pm). This further delay is a big problem to my daughter's case. She is moving away to…
This is what happened. I was travelling west on a four lane city street that was very light with traffic. I was making a left hand turn into a wide driveway of a business. There was traffic lights about 100 yards past the driveway and were red for the east-west traffic. I was in the left lane with my signal on and there was no oncoming traffic due to the red light. I was slowed right down…
I was driving my families older car and got pulled over, and the police officer informed me my plate was dirty. He issued me a ticket of $110 for the 13(2) act and obstruct plate as the offense. He informed me that such a plate could be used to avoid red lights as well as 407 tolls, also that buying a new plate can help to lower the ticket if I fight the charge, and that he also took a picture…
I received a red light camera ticket. In the picture, you see an ambulance in front of me with flashing lights. I had moved to alleviate the traffic behind me for the emergency vehicles coming behind it.
Is this a possible defense, if so, does anyone know any good case law to justify this position?
what happens if they charge someone for driving at 151Km/hr in montreal and they put for trial, appear after some months and sadly lost the trial ?
In montreal its $300 fine and 5demerit points ...
I heard Ontario and Qubec share the information. So once the trial is over ( and when the file moved to ontario) will his car gets towed and licence get suspended for 7days (later to 30 days ) ? and he…
I got a notice in the mail that trial is set four weeks from today, so it's time to request disclosure. I have zero chance of getting an 11b since trial is less than two months after the offense date and the officer did not reduce the charge. I really want to try and create delays on the trial, to reduce the chance of the officer showing up on multiple occasions. Is there any known loop-holes…
This weekend my father was involved in an accident with a transit bus in Burlington, ON. After the police showed up he was charged with "Fail to obey stop sign" Sec. 136(1)(a). At this particular intersection there NO stop signs but there are traffic lights. There is construction going on there so one of the light posts is smaller.
Driving conditions were terribly wet and visibility was low.…
So my boyfriend and I recently started dating. I have a vehicle that was insured. Insurance cost too much and I found it was just as easy to walk to work due to how close it was. But I didn't want to get rid of my car just yet, plus I'm still making payments on it as well. When we moved into our appartment together, I had it towed to my parking spot out back.
I was making a left hand legal turn on a green light, a driver came through the lane I was supposed to be going into ran the red and hit me head on as I was turning into my lane. When the officer came he was telling me that I was racing and driving recklessly because apparently there was reports of street racing in the area. I was not charged on the scene for this but I'm scared i am going to be…
I got a ticket for failure to surrender insurance because I did not have my new insurance stubs with me, just a bunch of expired ones. My policy number has not changed, so I asked the officer to just run the policy number so I could prove that I was in fact insured. He said they don't have that ability, handed me the ticket and reminded me that my car could have been impounded.
So I'm in a bit of a pickle and would appreciate if someone could clarify something for me.
I'm less than a month away (test on April 6th) from getting my full G license, and got a speeding ticket recently. The ticket was for 49km/h over the posted limit of 100km/h on the 403 in Oakville/Halton region, but was reduced from the initial ~60km/h over.