Over the last few months I have received several parking tickets from the City of Kitchener. I haven't paid any of them and have attempted to dicuss the situation with the parking authority of the City, however, they're very unreceptive and defensive. I work at a downtown construction site....ironically a Court House. The site takes up a whole city block, of which ONE side has 2 hour parking limit on the opposite side of the street. While I do have a monthly parking spot a couple of blocks away, here is the scenario: I am often sent out of the office for 10 mins to up to a few hours to pick up materials, drawings, etc, etc. As a result, I park my car in the 2 hour parking in order to off-load, etc. Sometimes I make several trips throughout the day. I am being issued tickets because at say 9:47am the parking police have noted my plate # and photographed my license plate. A few hours later (say 12:30pm) they have done the same "walk" and ticketed any vehicles that are parked on the side of the street which were noted as being there at 9:47am. Now, during the time from 9:47am to 12:30pm I could have left the office and returned a dozen times....however, I have not been in the parking spot for 2 hours - they are "assuming" I have been because my car was there at both those time periods. Exactly how can the City prove that the car has been there more than the two hour limit simply by documenting a time and plate number? I mean, unless they actually WATCH the car for two hours they can't 100% state that it was actually parked two hours. And in my case, I may be parked two hours THROUGHOUT the day, however, my car is rarely there for more than 30mins to 60mins depending on off-load time, etc etc etc. Across the street the construction workers are parking trucks anywhere and everywhere. On sidewalks, half hanging off sidewalks, motorcycles are even being parked on the property between the window and the sidewalks. Some of the motorcycles being parked there don't even belong to anyone on site, but rather other workers throughout the core as they have noticed the "free parking" available for those that drive two wheels. As the city has closed this sidewalk for construction, parking people tell me that this situation is fine - the road itself has not been closed. I've discussed the situation with parking authorities to no avail. I have attempted to challenge the tickets in court, but the city returned them stating that I hadn't filed the challenge in time. All the parking authorities did was advise me to get a monthly spot - which I already have - but I find it unreasonable and ridiculous to have to constantly walk 3 blocks to and from my car with materials, etc - again I've told this to the parking authorities. So, how do these municipalities defend the tickets issued when there is no definitive proof?
Over the last few months I have received several parking tickets from the City of Kitchener. I haven't paid any of them and have attempted to dicuss the situation with the parking authority of the City, however, they're very unreceptive and defensive.
I work at a downtown construction site....ironically a Court House. The site takes up a whole city block, of which ONE side has 2 hour parking limit on the opposite side of the street.
While I do have a monthly parking spot a couple of blocks away, here is the scenario:
I am often sent out of the office for 10 mins to up to a few hours to pick up materials, drawings, etc, etc. As a result, I park my car in the 2 hour parking in order to off-load, etc. Sometimes I make several trips throughout the day.
I am being issued tickets because at say 9:47am the parking police have noted my plate # and photographed my license plate. A few hours later (say 12:30pm) they have done the same "walk" and ticketed any vehicles that are parked on the side of the street which were noted as being there at 9:47am.
Now, during the time from 9:47am to 12:30pm I could have left the office and returned a dozen times....however, I have not been in the parking spot for 2 hours - they are "assuming" I have been because my car was there at both those time periods.
Exactly how can the City prove that the car has been there more than the two hour limit simply by documenting a time and plate number? I mean, unless they actually WATCH the car for two hours they can't 100% state that it was actually parked two hours. And in my case, I may be parked two hours THROUGHOUT the day, however, my car is rarely there for more than 30mins to 60mins depending on off-load time, etc etc etc.
Across the street the construction workers are parking trucks anywhere and everywhere. On sidewalks, half hanging off sidewalks, motorcycles are even being parked on the property between the window and the sidewalks. Some of the motorcycles being parked there don't even belong to anyone on site, but rather other workers throughout the core as they have noticed the "free parking" available for those that drive two wheels. As the city has closed this sidewalk for construction, parking people tell me that this situation is fine - the road itself has not been closed.
I've discussed the situation with parking authorities to no avail. I have attempted to challenge the tickets in court, but the city returned them stating that I hadn't filed the challenge in time. All the parking authorities did was advise me to get a monthly spot - which I already have - but I find it unreasonable and ridiculous to have to constantly walk 3 blocks to and from my car with materials, etc - again I've told this to the parking authorities.
So, how do these municipalities defend the tickets issued when there is no definitive proof?
Youd have to check the actual bylaw section that you were charged under. Im not familiar with Kitcheners, but some city bylaws state not to park or repark within a period of X hours, so they cover vehicles that may leave and return. If not, you could probably successfully fight the ticket in Court. Of course whether its worth spending a day in Court over is another matter.
Youd have to check the actual bylaw section that you were charged under. Im not familiar with Kitcheners, but some city bylaws state not to park or repark within a period of X hours, so they cover vehicles that may leave and return.
If not, you could probably successfully fight the ticket in Court. Of course whether its worth spending a day in Court over is another matter.
But again - how do they prove that the vehicle has been continuously parked for any stretch of time? No reparking bylaw exists, however, it doesn't change the fact that because a car is here now and 2 hours from now doesn't mean it was there the whole 2 hours?
But again - how do they prove that the vehicle has been continuously parked for any stretch of time? No reparking bylaw exists, however, it doesn't change the fact that because a car is here now and 2 hours from now doesn't mean it was there the whole 2 hours?
They cant say with absolute certainty, but that isnt the standard required for Court. They could probably articulate reasonable grounds to believe the vehicle was there for the entire time, based on seeing it in the same location at two separate times. Its unfortunate in your case if that isnt what happened, but I dont see any way to dispute it other than going to Court. Edit: A quick look at the City's bylaw page does show reparking regulations, but I don't know if they'd apply in the area where you were charged.
They cant say with absolute certainty, but that isnt the standard required for Court. They could probably articulate reasonable grounds to believe the vehicle was there for the entire time, based on seeing it in the same location at two separate times. Its unfortunate in your case if that isnt what happened, but I dont see any way to dispute it other than going to Court.
Edit: A quick look at the City's bylaw page does show reparking regulations, but I don't know if they'd apply in the area where you were charged.
There is a good chance they have marked your tire with chalk. That is what they do here and it is accepted practice. The chalk mark is usually on the tread and is hard to see if you are not looking for it. It is not something you will just notice. OPS
There is a good chance they have marked your tire with chalk. That is what they do here and it is accepted practice. The chalk mark is usually on the tread and is hard to see if you are not looking for it. It is not something you will just notice.
Actually, the OP said they photographed his vehicle. Many municipalities now have handheld electronic ticketing machines. They enter the plate into the device, photograph the vehicle and it prints out a ticket. The devices also store when/where the plate was last entered to determine if the vehicle is over the limit.
Actually, the OP said they photographed his vehicle. Many municipalities now have handheld electronic ticketing machines. They enter the plate into the device, photograph the vehicle and it prints out a ticket. The devices also store when/where the plate was last entered to determine if the vehicle is over the limit.
I know the photograph does not prove the vehicle has not been moved in the last two or three hours. I am guessing that there was a chalk mark used as well. Only full disclosure will tell, Or a court challenge. OPS
I know the photograph does not prove the vehicle has not been moved in the last two or three hours. I am guessing that there was a chalk mark used as well.
Only full disclosure will tell, Or a court challenge.
Hi so I have a bizzare situation. Today I received a summons for "being the owner of a motor vehicle bearing Vehicle Identification Number ###, failed to submit the vehicle, equipment or drawn vehicle for inspection or tests as required by an officer" for a vehicle I previously owned. Apparently a violation of HTA 82(9).
The date of offense is June 15, the summons was issued on October 26th and I…
Hi, I need some help for the ticket of lmproper left turn.
When i drove my car from east to west, intending to make a left turn and stop in front of stop line. There was a car in front of me, which has turn on yellow light. The light was turning red and then I thought I cannot leave in the intersection and turned, an incoming car was runing the light and hit me. No one got hurt but both cars had…
Have a ticket in which the radar used was a Genesis VP Directional. I had downloaded the manual for a Genesis VP but I now realize that the unit is not the same so it is the wrong manual. My trial is very soon so I do not have time to ask for disclosure of the manual.
Does anyone have access to an electronic version of the manual for Genesis VP Directional?
I was pulled over today in the city of Oakville for going 75 in a 40 zone. However, I am 100 percent certain that I was going only 50 in the 40 zone. When I was pulled over, I was driving my Dad's car which I felt was the reason I was getting stopped since two teenagers driving a 2013 S Class. He asked does I know why I am being pulled over and I…
I really need help on fighting my 9 tickets i received from one police officer. Here is some background of what happened!
I was caught speeding 66km on a 40km (school zone) on January 29, 2010. I was driving my friend's car and turns out she didnt renew the validation on the vehicle and didnt leave the up to date insurance paper on the car.
Hey question that I think here's probably the best place to get the answer:
I was charged with a careless driving offence in oct, trail in early april, so as of right now my insurance record is 100% clean... except the officer did file an accident report at the scene where I was classified at fault due to it being PI (although very minor). The person I hit did not sue etc, so the insurance company…
Very much unintentionally passed a stopped bus, with sign and flashing lights. Didn't realize I had done it until I was at the end of the bus. I'll save you my sob story, but it was truly accidental. I'm generally very cautious and have a perfect driving record. Never been stopped.
While I realize if a cop had seen me that I would have gotten a ticket, there were none in sight. Though I may very…
I was recently pulled over for running a red and I wasnt able to find my wallet in the car at the time to hand over my license. I had a passport in the vehicle that he used. The wallet was in the vehicle, it just fell through the seats. (Tough to find a black leather wallet in a black/black leather truck at night).
The officer still wrote the tickets for both he signed the one ticket (failure to…
I was passing a vehicle that was going slow for me and there was an oncoming vehicle coming at me. I speed up to get around the person I was passing and the oncoming vehicle turns out to be a cop who turns around and tickets me for going 110km in a 80km zone. How does it work with passing a vehicle? Once I passed the vehicle I went back down to my original speed of just under 100. The officer…
I picked up a brand new (old stock) Fuzzbuster a while ago at auction (wopping $5!!) and I want to mount it on the dash of my old GTO as a cool accessory when I show it at car shows. But I'm not sure if it's legal or not.
Here's my thoughts:
- It is early 70's technology (x-band) so it won't detect modern police radar. That's assuming no police force uses the old x-band frequency.
Hi guys, I'm still a little in shock of getting my first traffic ticket...
On Monday afternoon, I was returning from Toronto to Ottawa on HW416, I was driving about 15 over 100 like always. Then a car came very close to me on the left lane and made me nervous, I speed up unintentionally to pass the car and change lane, but while doing that a police car pull out of the median. He was hiding in…
May i ask this question regarding transport trucks limited to 105 km/h. Moving road blocks or safety?
IMO it isnt speed that kills. I find transport trucks infact help keep the road going. With cars that choose to not move to the right and slow down the middle lane the trucks would try to pass in their passing lane therefore the slower traffic would move right.
Received a notice from the police that a motion is being put forward to adjourn upcoming trial date. Notice indicates that an officer has sworn an affidavit that the crucial witness cannot attend date trial is set for (we know there is a social engagement at 7:30 pm for the witness, trial time is 1:30 pm). This further delay is a big problem to my daughter's case. She is moving away to…
This is what happened. I was travelling west on a four lane city street that was very light with traffic. I was making a left hand turn into a wide driveway of a business. There was traffic lights about 100 yards past the driveway and were red for the east-west traffic. I was in the left lane with my signal on and there was no oncoming traffic due to the red light. I was slowed right down…
I was driving my families older car and got pulled over, and the police officer informed me my plate was dirty. He issued me a ticket of $110 for the 13(2) act and obstruct plate as the offense. He informed me that such a plate could be used to avoid red lights as well as 407 tolls, also that buying a new plate can help to lower the ticket if I fight the charge, and that he also took a picture…
I received a red light camera ticket. In the picture, you see an ambulance in front of me with flashing lights. I had moved to alleviate the traffic behind me for the emergency vehicles coming behind it.
Is this a possible defense, if so, does anyone know any good case law to justify this position?
what happens if they charge someone for driving at 151Km/hr in montreal and they put for trial, appear after some months and sadly lost the trial ?
In montreal its $300 fine and 5demerit points ...
I heard Ontario and Qubec share the information. So once the trial is over ( and when the file moved to ontario) will his car gets towed and licence get suspended for 7days (later to 30 days ) ? and he…
I got a notice in the mail that trial is set four weeks from today, so it's time to request disclosure. I have zero chance of getting an 11b since trial is less than two months after the offense date and the officer did not reduce the charge. I really want to try and create delays on the trial, to reduce the chance of the officer showing up on multiple occasions. Is there any known loop-holes…
This weekend my father was involved in an accident with a transit bus in Burlington, ON. After the police showed up he was charged with "Fail to obey stop sign" Sec. 136(1)(a). At this particular intersection there NO stop signs but there are traffic lights. There is construction going on there so one of the light posts is smaller.
Driving conditions were terribly wet and visibility was low.…
So my boyfriend and I recently started dating. I have a vehicle that was insured. Insurance cost too much and I found it was just as easy to walk to work due to how close it was. But I didn't want to get rid of my car just yet, plus I'm still making payments on it as well. When we moved into our appartment together, I had it towed to my parking spot out back.
I was making a left hand legal turn on a green light, a driver came through the lane I was supposed to be going into ran the red and hit me head on as I was turning into my lane. When the officer came he was telling me that I was racing and driving recklessly because apparently there was reports of street racing in the area. I was not charged on the scene for this but I'm scared i am going to be…
I got a ticket for failure to surrender insurance because I did not have my new insurance stubs with me, just a bunch of expired ones. My policy number has not changed, so I asked the officer to just run the policy number so I could prove that I was in fact insured. He said they don't have that ability, handed me the ticket and reminded me that my car could have been impounded.
So I'm in a bit of a pickle and would appreciate if someone could clarify something for me.
I'm less than a month away (test on April 6th) from getting my full G license, and got a speeding ticket recently. The ticket was for 49km/h over the posted limit of 100km/h on the 403 in Oakville/Halton region, but was reduced from the initial ~60km/h over.