Hello all, I got 40 over on the 401. Decided to fight it and got my disclosure (which is unreadable by the way) along with a letter offering a deal. They are offering to go from speeding 40 over, 4 demerits and $295 to a disobey sign, 2 demerits and $180 which I think it is better but not sure if I should trust my luck. Should I take it and run? Is a disobey sign less harsh than a 40 over for insurance purposes? Any advice? The court is near Windsor and I live in Toronto.
Hello all,
I got 40 over on the 401. Decided to fight it and got my disclosure (which is unreadable by the way) along with a letter offering a deal.
They are offering to go from speeding 40 over, 4 demerits and $295
to a disobey sign, 2 demerits and $180 which I think it is better but not sure if I should trust my luck.
Should I take it and run?
Is a disobey sign less harsh than a 40 over for insurance purposes?
If it were me, I'd take it to trial---somethings seems fishy with that deal. Why would they drop speeding at 40 over to disobey sign (a totally unrelated offence), unless their case is weak! Think about it----all they have to prove in the speeding charge is that you were speeding---since speeding is an absolute liability offence. So, why would they drop the WHOLE speeding charge entirely? Seems to me like they are grasping at straws to get you on something, anything! Go over that disclosure again with a fine-tooth comb and try to spot what the Crown's weak spot is----there MUST be something there-----that offer just doesn't add up! If you find it, you'll have your case set! Get a 2nd opinion if necessary---THEN, decide!
If it were me, I'd take it to trial---somethings seems fishy with that deal. Why would they drop speeding at 40 over to disobey sign (a totally unrelated offence), unless their case is weak! Think about it----all they have to prove in the speeding charge is that you were speeding---since speeding is an absolute liability offence. So, why would they drop the WHOLE speeding charge entirely? Seems to me like they are grasping at straws to get you on something, anything!
Go over that disclosure again with a fine-tooth comb and try to spot what the Crown's weak spot is----there MUST be something there-----that offer just doesn't add up! If you find it, you'll have your case set! Get a 2nd opinion if necessary---THEN, decide!
highwaystar you are totally right! It does seem weird to me to drop that low. I was expecting down to 20 over but not disobey sign. My problem is that the cop notes even though they are extensive, I cant understand them. I have no problem fighting it. I wish I could find out where is the weak spot!
highwaystar you are totally right!
It does seem weird to me to drop that low. I was expecting down to 20 over but not disobey sign.
My problem is that the cop notes even though they are extensive, I cant understand them.
I have no problem fighting it. I wish I could find out where is the weak spot!
If you can't understand the officer's notes, write a letter to the prosecutor and ask them to have the officer type out his notes. Many times, if the prosecutor feels the notes ARE legible, the prosecutor will simply offer to go over the notes with you so that you CAN understand them. Some will offer to do it over the phone, while others will make themselves available to meet face-to-face. Either way, make sure you understand them. Once they are in a form that you understand, then you hopefully will find a weak spot on the case.
If you can't understand the officer's notes, write a letter to the prosecutor and ask them to have the officer type out his notes. Many times, if the prosecutor feels the notes ARE legible, the prosecutor will simply offer to go over the notes with you so that you CAN understand them. Some will offer to do it over the phone, while others will make themselves available to meet face-to-face. Either way, make sure you understand them. Once they are in a form that you understand, then you hopefully will find a weak spot on the case.
Thanks so much sir. I requested typed notes by email and got a positive response right away saying that they will request the officer to send them by mail. I will come back with an update as soon as I have them
Thanks so much sir.
I requested typed notes by email and got a positive response right away saying that they will request the officer to send them by mail.
I will come back with an update as soon as I have them
Hello all, So I got disclosure and could not understand cop handwriting. I asked for typed notes which I received. The cop made a mistake on the type notes: wrong postal code and wrong drivers license. The original hand written notes are correct regarding address and drivers licence number. However, the typed notes (second disclosure received) have the mistakes. Can I argue this? Will this be grounds for dismissal?
Hello all,
So I got disclosure and could not understand cop handwriting. I asked for typed notes which I received.
The cop made a mistake on the type notes: wrong postal code and wrong drivers license.
The original hand written notes are correct regarding address and drivers licence number. However, the typed notes (second disclosure received) have the mistakes.
Can I argue this? Will this be grounds for dismissal?
They wouldn't be a valid argument on the originals let alone a transcription.
salem2210 wrote:
The cop made a mistake on the type notes: wrong postal code and wrong drivers license.
The original hand written notes are correct regarding address and drivers licence number. However, the typed notes (second disclosure received) have the mistakes.
Can I argue this? Will this be grounds for dismissal?
They wouldn't be a valid argument on the originals let alone a transcription.
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…